The association of physical function and physical activity with all-cause mortality and adverse clinical outcomes in nondialysis chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: People with nondialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) and renal transplant recipients (RTRs) have compromised physical function and reduced physical activity (PA) levels. Whilst established in healthy older adults and other chronic diseases, this association remains underexplored in CKD. We aimed to review the existing research investigating poor physical function and PA with clinical outcome in nondialysis CKD. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched until December 2017 for cohort studies reporting objective or subjective measures of PA and physical function and the associations with adverse clinical outcomes and all-cause mortality in patients with nondialysis CKD stages 1-5 and RTRs. The protocol was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42016039060). REVIEW METHODS: Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Agency for Healthcare and Research Quality (AHRQ) standards. RESULTS: A total of 29 studies were included; 12 reporting on physical function and 17 on PA. Only eight studies were conducted with RTRs. The majority were classified as 'good' according to the AHRQ standards. Although not appropriate for meta-analysis due to variance in the outcome measures reported, a coherent pattern was seen with higher mortality rates or prevalence of adverse clinical events associated with lower PA and physical function levels, irrespective of the measurement tool used. Sources of bias included incomplete description of participant flow through the study and over reliance on self-report measures. CONCLUSIONS: In nondialysis CKD, survival rates correlate with greater PA and physical function levels. Further trials are required to investigate causality and the effectiveness of physical function and PA interventions in improving outcomes. Future work should identify standard assessment protocols for PA and physical function.

Using the eosin-5-maleimide binding test in the differential diagnosis of hereditary spherocytosis and hereditary pyropoikilocytosis.

BACKGROUND: Flow cytometric analysis of eosin-5-maleimide (EMA)-labeled red blood cells (RBCs) has been used as a screening test for the diagnosis of patients with hereditary spherocytosis (HS). We assessed the fluorescence profiles for patients having HS and hereditary pyropoikilocytosis (HPP) together with their red cell indices. METHODS: Flow cytometry was used to analyze EMA-labeled RBCs. Membrane protein defects and spectrin variants were identified by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. RESULTS: An overlay of single fluorescence peaks for normal individuals, and those with HS and HPP revealed a graded fluorescence intensity (normal > HS > HPP). The area under each peak defined a specific RBC subpopulation; namely, normal RBCs, spherocytes, and microspherocytes. HS RBCs having a gross reduction in band 3 or spectrin content gave fluorescence readings almost as low as those for HPP. Complex fluorescence profiles were obtained for isolated HS and HPP cases. CONCLUSIONS: The mean cell volume is a useful discriminator for HS and HPP. We presented evidence that a mixed RBC population could occur in some HS and HPP patients, either in a transient manner or for a long-term period. A differential diagnostic scheme for detecting HPP and HS by flow cytometry is proposed.