Regulatory Consideration for the Nonclinical Safety Assessment of Gene Therapies.

The nonclinical safety assessments for gene therapies are evolving, leveraging over 20 years of experimental and clinical experience. Despite the growing experience with these therapeutics, there are no approved harmonized global regulatory documents for developing gene therapies with only the ICH (International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use) S12 guidance on nonclinical biodistribution currently under discussion. Several health authorities have issued guidance over the last 15 years on the nonclinical safety aspects for gene therapy products, but many of the recommendations are limited to high-level concepts on nonclinical safety aspects or altogether silent on key topics. Historically, this approach was appropriately vague given our relatively small dataset of nonclinical experience, where a comprehensive and detailed regulatory guidance approach was unlikely to be appropriate to address all scenarios. However, harmonization of key considerations and assumptions can provide a consistent basis for developing the appropriate nonclinical safety development plans for individual programs, reducing uncertainty across regulatory regions and unnecessary animal use. Several key areas of nonclinical safety testing are nearing maturation for a harmonized approach, including species selection, certain aspects of study design, study duration, and unintended genomic integration risks. Furthermore, several emerging topics are unaddressed in current regulatory guidance for gene therapy products, which will become key areas of differentiation for the next generation of therapeutics. These topics include redosing, juvenile/pediatric safety, and reproductive/developmental safety testing, where relevant experience from other modalities can be applied. The rationale and potential study design considerations for these topics will be proposed, acknowledging that certain aspects of gene therapy development are not considered appropriate for harmonization. This article provides an overview of the current nonclinical safety regulatory landscape, summarizes typical nonclinical safety study designs, highlights areas of uncertainty, and discusses emerging topics that warrant consideration. Specific recommendations and perspectives are provided to inform future regulatory discussions and harmonization efforts.

Classic and evolving approaches to evaluating cross reactivity of mAb and mAb-like molecules - A survey of industry 2008-2019.

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and mAb derivatives have become mainstay pharmaceutical modalites. A critical assessment is to ascertain the specificity of these molecules prior to human clinical trials. The primary technique for determining specificity has been the immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based "Tissue Cross-Reactivity" (TCR) assay, where the candidate molecule is applied to > 30 tissues to look for unexpected staining. In the last few years, however, non-IHC array-based platforms have emerged that allow for screening 75-80% of the human membrane proteome, indicating a viable alternative and/or addition to the IHC methods. The preclinical sciences subcommittee of the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO), "BioSafe", conducted a survey of 26 BIO member companies to understand current sponsor experience with the IHC and array techniques. In the last ten years, respondents noted they have conducted more than 650 IHC TCR assays, largely on full length mAbs, with varying impacts on programs. Protein/cell arrays have been utilized by almost half of the companies and sponsors are gaining familiarity and comfort with the platform. Initial experience with recent versions of these arrays has been largely positive. While most sponsors are not prepared to eliminate the IHC TCR assay, growing experience with these alternatives allows them to confidently choose other approaches with or without TCR assays.

Industry experiences with immune-mediated findings in biotherapeutic nonclinical toxicology studies.

With the growth of monoclonal antibodies and other proteins as major modalities in the pharmaceutical industry, there has been an increase in pharmacology and toxicity testing of biotherapeutics in animals. Animals frequently mount an immune response to human therapeutic proteins. This can result in asymptomatic anti-drug antibody formation, immune complexes that affect drug disposition and/or organ function such as kidney, cytokine release responses, fatal hypersensitivity, or a range of reactions in between. In addition, an increasing number of oncology therapeutics are being developed that enhance or directly stimulate immune responses by a variety of mechanisms, which could increase the risk of autoreactivity and an autoimmune-like syndrome in animals and humans. When evaluating the risk of biotherapeutics prior to entering the clinic, the nonclinical safety data may include any of these responses and it is critical to understand whether they represent a safety liability for humans. The DruSafe Leadership group of the IQ Consortium conducted a survey of industry to understand sponsors' experiences with these immune reactions in nonclinical studies related to both immunogenicity and pharmacologically-mediated immune perturbations. The survey covered what pathways were affected, how the immune responses were presented, how the company and health authorities interpreted the data and whether the immune responses were observed in the clinic. Additionally, the survey gathered information on association of these findings with anti-drug antibodies as well as sponsor's use of immunogenicity predictive tools. The data suggests that the ability of a biotherapeutic to activate the immune system, intended or not, plays a significant role on characteristics of the response and whether theys are translatable.

Nonclinical Safety Evaluation of scAAV8-RLBP1 for Treatment of RLBP1 Retinitis Pigmentosa.

Retinitis pigmentosa is a form of retinal degeneration usually caused by genetic mutations affecting key functional proteins. We have previously demonstrated efficacy in a mouse model of RLBP1 deficiency with a self-complementary AAV8 vector carrying the gene for human RLBP1 under control of a short RLBP1 promoter (CPK850).1 In this article, we describe the nonclinical safety profile of this construct as well as updated efficacy data in the intended clinical formulation. In Rlbp1-/- mice dosed at a range of CPK850 levels, a minimum efficacious dose of 3 × 107 vg in a volume of 1 µL was observed. For safety assessment in these and Rlbp1+/+ mice, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and histopathological analysis indicated retinal thinning that appeared to be dose-dependent for both Rlbp1 genotypes, with no qualitative difference noted between Rlbp1+/+ and Rlbp1-/- mice. In a non-human primate study, RLBP1 mRNA expression was detected and dose dependent intraocular inflammation and retinal thinning were observed. Inflammation resolved slowly over time and did not appear to be exacerbated in the presence of anti-AAV8 antibodies. Biodistribution was evaluated in rats and satellite animals in the non-human primate study. The vector was largely detected in ocular tissues and low levels in the optic nerve, superior colliculus, and lateral geniculate nucleus, with limited distribution outside of these tissues. These data suggest that an initial subretinal dose of ∼3 × 107 vg/µL CPK850 can safely be used in clinical trials.

Challenges and opportunities for the future of monoclonal antibody development: Improving safety assessment and reducing animal use.

The market for biotherapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is large and is growing rapidly. However, attrition poses a significant challenge for the development of mAbs, and for biopharmaceuticals in general, with large associated costs in resource and animal use. Termination of candidate mAbs may occur due to poor translation from preclinical models to human safety. It is critical that the industry addresses this problem to maintain productivity. Though attrition poses a significant challenge for pharmaceuticals in general, there are specific challenges related to the development of antibody-based products. Due to species specificity, non-human primates (NHP) are frequently the only pharmacologically relevant species for nonclinical safety and toxicology testing for the majority of antibody-based products, and therefore, as more mAbs are developed, increased NHP use is anticipated. The integration of new and emerging in vitro and in silico technologies, e.g., cell- and tissue-based approaches, systems pharmacology and modeling, have the potential to improve the human safety prediction and the therapeutic mAb development process, while reducing and refining animal use simultaneously. In 2014, to engage in open discussion about the challenges and opportunities for the future of mAb development, a workshop was held with over 60 regulators and experts in drug development, mechanistic toxicology and emerging technologies to discuss this issue. The workshop used industry case-studies to discuss the value of the in vivo studies and identify opportunities for in vitro technologies in human safety assessment. From these and continuing discussions it is clear that there are opportunities to improve safety assessment in mAb development using non-animal technologies, potentially reducing future attrition, and there is a shared desire to reduce animal use through minimised study design and reduced numbers of studies.

Inflammation and immunogenicity limit the utility of the rabbit as a nonclinical species for ocular biologic therapeutics.

The nonclinical safety evaluation of therapeutic drug candidates is commonly conducted in two species (rodent and non-rodent) in keeping with international health authority guidance. Biologic drugs typically have restricted species cross-reactivity, necessitating the evaluation of safety in non-human primates and thus limiting the utility of lower order species. Safety studies of cross-reactive ocular biologic drug candidates have been conducted in rabbits as a second toxicology species, despite the fact that rabbits are not a rodent species. Such studies are often confounded by the development of anti-drug antibodies and severe ocular inflammation, the latter requiring studies to be terminated prematurely for animal welfare reasons. Notably, these confounding factors preclude the interpretation of safety. Nonclinical toxicology programs should be designed with consideration of ethical animal use and 3Rs principles (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement). The experience of several pharmaceutical sponsors, demonstrating that toxicology studies of ocular (intravitreal and topical ocular) biologic drug candidates in the rabbit are of limited interpretive value, calls into question the utility of such studies in this species and indicates that such studies should not be conducted.

Nonclinical evaluation of GMA161--an antihuman CD16 (FcγRIII) monoclonal antibody for treatment of autoimmune disorders in CD16 transgenic mice.

Fc receptors are a critical component of the innate immune system responsible for the recognition of cross-linked antibodies and the subsequent clearance of pathogens. However, in autoimmune diseases, these receptors play a role in the deleterious action of self-directed antibodies and as such are candidate targets for treatment. GMA161 is an aglycosyl, humanized version of the murine antibody 3G8 that targets the human low-affinity Fcγ receptor III (CD16). As CD16 expression and sequence have high species specificity, preclinical assessments were conducted in mice transgenic for both isoforms of human CD16, CD16A, and CD16B. This transgenic mouse model was useful in transitioning into phase I clinical trials, as it generated positive efficacy data in a relevant disease model and an acceptable single-dose safety profile. However, when GMA161 or its murine parent 3G8 were dosed repeatedly in transgenic mice having both human CD16 isoforms, severe reactions were observed that were not associated with significant cytokine release, nor were they alleviated by antihistamine administration. Prophylactic dosing with an inhibitor of platelet-activating factor (PAF), however, completely eliminated all signs of hypersensitivity. These findings suggest that (1) GMA161 elicits a reaction that is target dependent, (2) immunogenicity and similar adverse reactions were observed with a murine version of the antibody, and (3) the reaction is driven by the atypical hypersensitivity pathway mediated by PAF.

Preclinical safety evaluation of AAV2-sFLT01- a gene therapy for age-related macular degeneration.

AAV2-sFLT01 is a vector that expresses a modified soluble Flt1 receptor designed to neutralize the proangiogenic activities of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) via an intravitreal injection. Owing to minimal data available for the intravitreal route of administration for adeno-associated virus (AAV), we initiated a 12-month safety study of AAV2-sFLT01 administered intravitreally at doses of 2.4 × 10(9) vector genomes (vg) and 2.4 × 10(10) vg to cynomolgus monkeys. Expression of sFlt01 protein peaked at ~1-month postadministration and remained relatively constant for the remainder of the study. Electroretinograms, fluorescein angiograms, and tonometry were assessed every 3 months, with no test article-related findings observed in any group. Indirect ophthalmoscopy and slit lamp exams performed monthly revealed a mild to moderate but self-resolving vitreal inflammation in the high-dose group only, which follow-up studies suggest was directed against the AAV2 capsid. Histological evaluation revealed no structural changes in any part of the eye and occasional inflammatory cells in the trabecular meshwork, vitreous and retina in the high-dose group. Biodistribution analysis in rats and monkeys found only trace amounts of vector outside the injected eye. In summary, these studies found AAV2-sFLT01 to be well-tolerated, localized, and capable of long-term expression.

Insulin-like growth factor factor binding protein-2 is a novel mediator of p53 inhibition of insulin-like growth factor signaling.

The p53 tumor suppressor induces cellular growth arrest and apoptosis in response to DNA damage by transcriptionally activating or repressing target genes and also through protein-protein interactions and direct mitochondrial activities. In 1995, insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-3 was identified as one of the genes transcriptionally activated by p53. IGFBP-3 is one of six closely related IGFBP's, with additional IGFBP-related proteins belonging to the IGFBP superfamily. Here we show that IGFBP-2 is also a p53 target. Like IGFBP-3, IGFBP-2 secretion is reduced when p53+/+ lung cancer cells are transfected with human papillomavirus E6, which targets p53 for degradation. IGFBP-2 mRNA is induced by irradiation in vivo in a p53-dependent manner. p53 protein binds IGFBP-2 intronic sequences in an electrophoretic mobility shift assay, and activates transcription in a luciferase assay. Loss of IGFBP-2 inhibits the ability of p53 to inhibit the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1 by IGF-I. Thus, p53 effects on the IGF axis are more complex than previously appreciated, and overall transform the axis from IGF-mediated mitogenesis to growth inhibition and apoptosis. This has significant implications for how growth hormone and IGF-I can induce growth without also inducing cancer.

BRCA1 augments transcription by the NF-kappaB transcription factor by binding to the Rel domain of the p65/RelA subunit.

BRCA1 is a tumor suppressor gene mutated in cases of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. BRCA1 protein is involved in apoptosis and growth/tumor suppression. In this study, we present evidence that p65/RelA, one of the two subunits of the transcription factor NF-kappaB, binds to the BRCA1 protein. Treatment of 293T cells with the cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha induces an interaction between endogenous p65/RelA and BRCA1. GST-protein affinity assay experiments reveal that the Rel homology domain of the p65/RelA subunit of NF-kappaB interacts with multiple sites within the N-terminal region of BRCA1. Transient transfection of BRCA1 significantly enhances the ability of the tumor necrosis factor-alpha or interleukin-1beta to activate transcription from the promoters of NF-kappaB target genes. Mutation of the NF-kappaB-binding sites in the NF-kappaB reporter blocks the effect of BRCA1 on transcription. Also the ability of BRCA1 to activate NF-kappaB target genes is inhibited by a super-stable inhibitor of NF-kappaB and by the chemical inhibitor SN-50. These data indicate that BRCA1 acts as a co-activator with NF-kappaB. In addition, we show that cells infected with an adenovirus expressing BRCA1 up-regulate the endogenous expression of NF-kappaB target genes Fas and interferon-beta. Together, this information suggests that BRCA1 may play a role in cell life-death decisions following cell stress by modulation of the activity of NF-kappaB.

Structure-based design of p18INK4c proteins with increased thermodynamic stability and cell cycle inhibitory activity.

p18(INK4c) is a member of the INK4 family of proteins that regulate the G(1) to S cell cycle transition by binding to and inhibiting the pRb kinase activity of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6. The p16(INK4a) member of the INK4 protein family is altered in a variety of cancers and structure-function studies of the INK4 proteins reveal that the vast majority of missense tumor-derived p16(INK4a) mutations reduce protein thermodynamic stability. Based on this observation, we used p18(INK4c) as a model to test the proposal that INK4 proteins with increased stability might have enhanced cell cycle inhibitory activity. Structure-based mutagenesis was used to prepare p18(INK4c) mutant proteins with a predicted increase in stability. Using this approach, we report the generation of three mutant p18(INK4C) proteins, F71N, F82Q, and F92N, with increased stability toward thermal denaturation of which the F71N mutant also showed an increased stability to chemical denaturation. The x-ray crystal structures of the F71N, F82Q, and F92N p18INK4C mutant proteins were determined to reveal the structural basis for their increased stability properties. Significantly, the F71N mutant also showed enhanced CDK6 interaction and cell cycle inhibitory activity in vivo, as measured using co-immunoprecipitation and transient transfection assays, respectively. These studies show that a structure-based approach to increase the thermodynamic stability of INK4 proteins can be exploited to prepare more biologically active molecules with potential applications for the development of molecules to treat p16(INK4a)-mediated cancers.