Frameworks, guidelines, and tools to develop a learning health system for Indigenous health: An environmental scan for Canada.

Introduction: First Nations, Inuit, and Métis (FNIM) peoples experience systemic health disparities within Ontario's healthcare system. Learning health systems (LHS) is a rapidly growing interdisciplinary area with the potential to address these inequitable health outcomes through a comprehensive health system that draws on science, informatics, incentives, and culture for ongoing innovation and improvement. However, global literature is in its infancy with grounding theories and principles still emerging. In addition, there is inadequate information on LHS within Ontario's health care context. Methods: We conducted an environmental scan between January and April 2021 and again in June 2022 to identify existing frameworks, guidelines, and tools for designing, developing, implementing, and evaluating an LHS. Results: We found 37 relevant sources. This paper maps the literature and identifies gaps in knowledge based on five key pillars: (a) data and evidence-driven, (b) patient-centeredness, (c) system-supported, (d) cultural competencies enabled, and (e) the learning health system. Conclusion: We provide recommendations for implementation accordingly. The literature on LHS provides a starting point to address the health disparities of FNIM peoples within the healthcare system but Indigenous community partnerships in LHS development and operation will be key to success.

Indigenous Cultural Safety Training for Applied Health, Social Work, and Education Professionals: A PRISMA Scoping Review.

Anti-Indigenous racism is a widespread social problem in health and education systems in English-speaking colonized countries. Cultural safety training (CST) is often promoted as a key strategy to address this problem, yet little evidence exists on how CST is operationalized and evaluated in health and education systems. This scoping review sought to broadly synthesize the academic literature on how CST programs are developed, implemented, and evaluated in the applied health, social work and education fields in Canada, United States, Australia, and New Zealand. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, and ASSIA were searched for articles published between 1996 and 2020. The Joanna Briggs Institute's three-step search strategy and PRISMA extension for scoping reviews were adopted, with 134 articles included. CST programs have grown significantly in the health, social work, and education fields in the last three decades, and they vary significantly in their objectives, modalities, timelines, and how they are evaluated. The involvement of Indigenous peoples in CST programs is common, but their roles are rarely specified. Indigenous groups must be intentionally and meaningfully engaged throughout the entire duration of research and practice. Cultural safety and various related concepts should be careful considered and applied for the relevant context.

Needing indigenous biometrics for health in Canada.

This article presents a critical analysis of the use of biometrics in clinical practice and their inadequacies for Indigenous populations in Canada and globally. Misclassifications of health status based on biometrics have health implications across the lifespan, from gestation to older adulthood, which are also examined. The social determinants of health and of Indigenous health compound the impact of inaccurate biometrics on First Nations, Inuit and Métis populations. Moving forward, biometric use should be done in partnership with Indigenous peoples and with consideration of the surrounding context. Future research should consider bridging existing gaps in knowledge on this topic in culturally safe ways, to improve the quality and depth of information available and inform more equitable health care for Indigenous populations.