Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil ; 33(5): 976-991, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32100409

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: People with intellectual disabilities are known to have increased medical needs and are prescribed more medication than the general population. Understanding the reality of incorporating medication into their lives would help healthcare professionals provide care in more meaningful and personalised ways. AIM: A narrative review of the current literature relating to people with intellectual disabilities and their experience of medication/pharmaceutical care. METHOD: Electronic databases were searched for articles relating to intellectual disabilities and medication administration or pharmaceutical care. Other relevant papers identified from included article reference lists were also identified. A narrative literature was undertaken due to the heterogeneity of the identified papers. RESULTS: A total of 29 studies from the literature searches were included alongside other relevant papers. CONCLUSIONS: The published literature noted some aspects of the medication-related experiences of people with intellectual disabilities. However, a greater understanding of medication-related experiences is still required.


Subject(s)
Intellectual Disability , Humans , Intellectual Disability/drug therapy , Narration
2.
Health Soc Care Community ; 28(1): 160-172, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31490598

ABSTRACT

Self-care, which refers to what people do to prevent disease and maintain good health, can alleviate negative health consequences of people experiencing homelessness. The aim of the study was to apply a theoretically informed approach in exploring engagement of people experiencing homelessness in self-care and to identify factors that can be targeted in future health and social care interventions. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 participants opportunistically recruited from a specialist homelessness healthcare centre of North East Scotland, the United Kingdom (UK). An interview schedule was developed based on the theoretical domains framework (TDF). Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Six aspects of self-care were explored, including (a) self-awareness of physical and mental health, (b) health literacy, including health seeking behaviour, (c) healthy eating, (d) risk avoidance or mitigation, (v) physical activity and sleep and (e) maintaining personal hygiene. Thematic analysis was conducted by two independent researchers following the Framework Approach. Participants described low engagement in self-care. Most of the barriers to engagement in self-care by participants were related to 'environmental context and resources' domain of TDF. Participants often resorted to stealing or begging for food. Many perceived having low health literacy to interpret health-related information. Visits to churches and charities to get a shower or to obtain free meals were commonplace. Participants expressed pessimism that there was 'nothing' they could do to improve their health and described perceived barriers often too big for them to overcome. Alienation, lack of social support and the perception that they had done irreversible damage to their health prevented their involvement in self-care. The theme of 'social circle' held examples of both enabler and barriers in participants' uptake of risky behaviours. Health and social services should work with persons experiencing homelessness in designing and delivering targeted interventions that address contextual barriers, multi-morbidity, health literacy and self-efficacy.


Subject(s)
Health Behavior , Health Status , Ill-Housed Persons/psychology , Self Care/psychology , Adult , Aged , Diet, Healthy , Exercise , Female , Health Literacy , Humans , Hygiene , Interviews as Topic , Male , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Qualitative Research , Risk Assessment , Scotland , Self Efficacy
3.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 40(2): 394-402, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29332145

ABSTRACT

Background Multi-compartment compliance aids (MCAs) are promoted as a potential solution to medicines non-adherence despite the absence of high quality evidence of effectiveness of MCA use impacting medicines adherence or any clinical outcomes. Furthermore, there is a lack of qualitative research which focuses on the perspectives of older people receiving MCAs. Objectives To describe experiences and beliefs surrounding very sheltered housing (VSH) residents' use of MCAs with emphasis on issues of personalisation, reablement, shared decision-making, independence and support. Setting VSH in north east Scotland. Methods Qualitative, face-to-face interviews with 20 residents (≥ 65 years, using MCA > 6 months) in three VSH complexes. Interviews focused on: when and why the MCA was first introduced; who was involved in making that decision; how the MCA was used; perceptions of benefit; and any difficulties encountered. Interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed and analysed using a framework approach. Main outcome measure Experiences and beliefs surrounding use of MCAs. Results Nine themes were identified: shared decision-making; independence; knowledge and awareness of why MCA had been commenced; support in medicines taking; knowledge and awareness of medicines; competent and capable to manage medicines; social aspects of carers supporting MCA use; benefits of MCAs; and drawbacks. Conclusion Experiences and beliefs are diverse and highly individual, with themes identified aligning to key strategies and policies of the Scottish Government, and other developed countries around the world, specifically personalisation shared decision making, independence, reablement and support.


Subject(s)
Culture , Decision Making , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Housing for the Elderly/statistics & numerical data , Medication Adherence , Pharmacists/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Scotland/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Br J Gen Pract ; 68(667): e105-e113, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29335329

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The relocation of formerly homeless patients eligible to transfer from a specialist homeless healthcare centre (SHHC) to mainstream general practices is key to patient integration in the local community. Failure to transition patients conferring eligibility for relocation may also negatively impact on SHHC service delivery. AIM: To explore barriers and facilitators of relocation from the perspectives of formerly homeless patients and healthcare staff involved in their care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative semi-structured face-to-face and telephone interviews conducted in the north east of Scotland. METHOD: Participants were patients and healthcare staff including GPs, nurses, substance misuse workers, administrative, and local community pharmacy staff recruited from one SHHC, two mainstream general practices, and four community pharmacies. Interview schedules based on the 14 domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) were drafted. Transcripts of the interviews were analysed by two independent researchers using a framework approach. RESULTS: Seventeen patients and 19 staff participated. Key barriers and facilitators aligned to TDF domains included: beliefs about consequences regarding relocation; patient intention to relocate; environmental context and resources in relation to the care of the patients and assessing patient eligibility; patient skills in relation to integration; social and professional role and identity of staff and patients; and emotional attachment to the SHHC. CONCLUSION: Implementation of services, which promote relocation and integration, may optimise patient relocation from SHHCs to mainstream general practices. These include peer support networks for patients, better information provision on the relocation process, and supporting patients in the journey of identifying and adjusting to mainstream practices.


Subject(s)
General Practice/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Ill-Housed Persons , Patient Transfer/organization & administration , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Decision Making, Organizational , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Pharmacies , Qualitative Research , Scotland , Specialization
5.
Res Social Adm Pharm ; 14(4): 347-355, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28420596

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multi-compartment compliance aids (MCAs) are repackaging systems for solid dosage form medicines. Acknowledging the lack of evidence that MCAs improve adherence or clinical outcomes, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society has expressed concern that MCAs have 'become regarded as a panacea for medicines use'. OBJECTIVES: To determine the behaviors and experiences of the community pharmacy team around MCA provision. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 26 community pharmacies in the north east of Scotland. Survey items were grouped into: current activities in the provision of MCAs; potential influences on these activities; reports of patient experiences; and demographics. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, and content analysis of responses to open questions. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on the items of potential influences on activities. RESULTS: Data were collected from 136 community team members (median 4, range1-10 per pharmacy; 32.3% pharmacists). All were involved in some aspect of MCA provision and within the same pharmacy, several different staff positions were commonly involved in the same activity. PCA gave seven components; the lowest scores were obtained for the component of 'others expecting me to provide MCAs'. Participants agreed that GPs, patients and their families, and carers expected them to provide MCAs. Positive experiences of MCA provision were in themes of promoting patient adherence, reducing patient stress and enhancing patient monitoring. Further negative experiences were in of lack of shared patient decision making, worsening adherence and generation of medicines waste, and dealing with changing medicines. MCAs were not always considered to be the most appropriate solution. CONCLUSION: While community pharmacy teams value MCAs, there may be issues around staff assignment to particular roles, expectations from others and reports of negative patient experiences. A systematic approach to MCA provision and monitoring involving the multidisciplinary health and social care team is warranted.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Community Pharmacy Services , Drug Packaging , Medication Adherence , Pharmacists , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
6.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 83(7): 1515-1520, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28009450

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To assess the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) use in a population of community-based multicompartment compliance aid (MCA) users in north-east Scotland. METHODS: Data for MCAs dispensed by 48 of the 50 community pharmacies in Aberdeen City between 1st June to 31st October 2014, together with concurrently prescribed medications, patient demographics and Carstairs index of social deprivation were recorded. Drug-specific quality indicators for PIMs from the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare were applied and bivariate logistic regression analysis used to assess for associations with demographic variables. RESULTS: The median age was 82 years (range 12-105 years, 59% female). A total of 1977 PIMs were identified affecting 57.8% of patients. A quarter of patients were prescribed ≥10 medications and 43% had a prescription containing at least one clinically significant drug-drug interaction (DDI). Ten drug groups accounted for 76% of all DDIs. A significant increase in the risk for at least one PIM was associated with female sex (for all indicators of PIM use), age <80 years (three or more psychotropic medicines [OR 5.88, 2.96-11.70, P < 0.001]) and lower socioeconomic status (prescription of ≥10 medications [OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.16-1.78], prescription of a long-acting benzodiazepine [OR: 1.84, CI: 1.14-2.98]). CONCLUSIONS: MCA use is associated with a significant incidence of PIMs particularly affecting those younger than 80 years and those living in deprived areas. Our findings indicate the need for a more aggressive multidisciplinary approach to the review of the medications prescribed to MCA users.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Inappropriate Prescribing/statistics & numerical data , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Potentially Inappropriate Medication List/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ambulatory Care/methods , Ambulatory Care/organization & administration , Benzodiazepines/pharmacology , Community Pharmacy Services/statistics & numerical data , Drug Interactions , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polypharmacy , Risk Factors , Scotland , Young Adult
7.
Patient ; 9(6): 583-590, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27170056

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multi-compartment compliance aids (MCAs) are repackaging systems for solid dosage form medicines, heralded by some as a solution to non-adherence but with little evidence of benefit. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to use a theoretical approach to describe the behavioural determinants impacting the use of MCAs in older people from the perspectives of the individual and health and social care providers. DESIGN: A case study investigation was conducted. SETTING: The study took place in three very sheltered housing sites in North East Scotland. SUBJECTS: Twenty residents (≥65 years) using an MCA for at least 6 months and 34 members of their care team [17 formal carers, eight general practitioners (GPs), eight pharmacists, one family member]. METHODS: Semi-structured, face-to-face interviews with items based on the Theoretical Domains Framework were conducted. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Several behavioural determinants impacted the use of MCAs from the perspectives of the stakeholders involved. Goals of use related to promoting adherence and safety, with less emphasis on independence. Beliefs of consequences related to these goals and were considered of value, with additional consequences of concern around reduced awareness of medicines and complexities of changing medicines. There was a lack of clearly defined roles of professionals for all processes of MCA use, with evidence of blurring and gaps in roles. There were additional issues relating to capabilities of older people in using MCAs and capacity issues for pharmacy-supplied MCAs. CONCLUSIONS: Several behavioural determinants impacted the use of MCAs, and while MCAs were valued, there is a need to more clearly define, develop, implement and evaluate a model of care encompassing resident and medicines assessment, supply and ongoing review of MCAs.


Subject(s)
Housing for the Elderly , Patient Compliance , Aged , Caregivers , Female , General Practitioners , Housing , Humans , Male , Pharmacists , Scotland
8.
Drugs Aging ; 29(8): 681-90, 2012 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22775478

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of older patients are prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). However, the extent of inappropriate PPI prescribing in this group is largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify clinical and demographic factors associated with inappropriate PPI prescribing in older patients and to assess the effects of a targeted educational strategy in a controlled hospital environment. METHODS: Clinical and demographic characteristics and full medication exposure on admission were recorded in 440 consecutive older patients (mean ± SD age 84 ± 7 years) admitted to a teaching hospital between 1 February 2011 and 30 June 2011. A 4-week educational strategy to reduce inappropriate PPI prescribing during hospital stay, either by stopping or reducing PPI doses, was conducted within the study period. The main outcome measures of the study were the incidence of inappropriate PPI prescribing and the effects of interventions to reduce it. RESULTS: On admission, PPIs were established therapy in 164 patients (37%). This was considered inappropriate in 100 patients (61%). Lower Charlson Comorbidity Index score (odds ratio [OR] 0.76; 95% CI 0.57, 0.94; p = 0.006) and history of dementia (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.28, 1.83; p = 0.005) were independently associated with inappropriate PPI prescribing. Interventions to reduce inappropriate PPI prescribing occurred more frequently during and after the education phase (frequency of interventions in patients with inappropriate PPI prescribing: pre-education phase 9%, during education phase 43%, and post-education phase 46%, p = 0.006). Prescribing interventions were not associated with acid rebound symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate PPI prescribing in older patients is frequent and independently associated with co-morbidities and dementia. A targeted in-hospital educational strategy can significantly and safely reduce inappropriate PPI prescribing in the short term.


Subject(s)
Inappropriate Prescribing/prevention & control , Inappropriate Prescribing/statistics & numerical data , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Frail Elderly/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...