Fever phobia in caregivers presenting to New Zealand emergency departments.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of fever phobia among caregivers of children presenting to New Zealand EDs. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was administered to caregivers of children <5 years of age presenting to three New Zealand EDs. We defined fever phobia as caregivers having a high level of concern regarding fever or having incorrect beliefs regarding the consequences of fever. RESULTS: A total of 502 caregivers completed the survey. Fever phobia was present in 365 (74.3% [95% confidence interval, CI 70.3-78.0%]) respondents, with 242 (49.3% [95% CI 44.9-53.7%]) caregivers reporting a high level of concern regarding fever, and 288 (61.8% [95% CI 57.3-66.1%]) caregivers reporting at least one incorrect belief regarding the consequences of fever. Majority of caregivers (n = 383, 87.6% [95% CI 84.2-90.4%]) knew the correct dosing interval for paracetamol, compared to less than half of caregivers (n = 179, 42.5% [95% CI 37.9-47.3%]) for ibuprofen. Caregivers reported non-evidence-based fever management practices such as sponging, always giving paracetamol and/or ibuprofen for fever, and waking children from sleep to give antipyretics. Over one-third of caregivers identified ED doctors (n = 195, 40.2% [95% CI 34.7-43.2%]) and ED nurses (n = 173, 35.7% [95% CI 31.5-40.0%]) as sources of information regarding fever management. A higher level of education was associated with fever phobia (odds ratio 1.68 [95% CI 1.04-2.72], P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Fever phobia is prevalent among caregivers of children presenting to New Zealand EDs. Opportunistic caregiver education in the ED in conjunction with public health strategies are needed to dispel undue fears and misconceptions about fever.

The Epidemiology and Associated Phenomenology of Formal Thought Disorder: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Authors of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fifth Edition (DSM-V) have recommended to "integrate dimensions into clinical practice." The epidemiology and associated phenomenology of formal thought disorder (FTD) have been described but not reviewed. We aimed to carry out a systematic review of FTD to this end. METHODS: A systematic review of FTD literature, from 1978 to 2013, using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 881 abstracts were reviewed and 120 articles met inclusion criteria; articles describing FTD factor structure (n = 15), prevalence and longitudinal course (n = 41), role in diagnosis (n = 22), associated clinical variables (n = 56), and influence on outcome (n = 35) were included. Prevalence estimates for FTD in psychosis range from 5% to 91%. Dividing FTD into domains, by factor analysis, can accurately identify 91% of psychotic diagnoses. FTD is associated with increased clinical severity. Poorer outcomes are predicted by negative thought disorder, more so than the typical construct of "disorganized speech." CONCLUSION: FTD is a common symptom of psychosis and may be considered a marker of illness severity. Detailed dimensional assessment of FTD can clarify diagnosis and may help predict prognosis.