Building Professionalism Through Management Training: New England Public Health Training Center's Low-Cost, High-Impact Model.

CONTEXT: Evolving practices, accreditation, and priorities established in Public Health 3.0 are adding to the long-identified need for management training among public health practitioners. PROGRAM: The New England Public Health Training Center is addressing this need with a flexible, open-source, 16-topic training program. The program is designed to build competencies for current and future managers, preparing them for their day-to-day tasks and for the kinds of adaptation suggested by Public Health 3.0 advocates. IMPLEMENTATION: The training program uses live expert instructors for 10 webinars and 2 in-person trainings. Experts have also created the content for multiple self-paced E-Learnings that trainees undertake in addition to the instructor-led sessions. A webinar platform with breakout rooms and an advanced learning management system allows for online discussion and mentor interaction. The course has now been offered, evaluated, and modified 3 times, and the materials are available for noncommercial use by the public health community. EVALUATION: Using the Kirkpatrick training evaluation model, the recent cohort was satisfied (87.5%) with the training, reported identifying actions to apply information learned to their work (85.8%), and experienced statistically significant knowledge gains. Earlier trainees reported work-related behavior change. DISCUSSION: Management training offers the hope of increasing professionalism; creating better, more effective workplaces and programs; and preparing practitioners for an evolving public health landscape. Early results indicate that NEPHTC's program, Managing Effectively in Today's Public Health Environment, is a useful tool in realizing that hope.

On your time: online training for the public health workforce.

The need for competency-based training for the public health workforce is well documented. However, human and financial resource limitations within public health agencies often make it difficult for public health practitioners to attend classroom-based training programs. The Internet is an increasingly popular way of extending training beyond the workforce. Although research describes attributes of effective online learning modules, much of the available training delivered via the Internet does not incorporate such attributes. The authors describe the On Your Time training series, an effective distance education program and training model for public health practitioners, which includes a standardized process for development, review, evaluation, and continuous quality improvement. On Your Time is a series of awareness-level (i.e., addressing what practitioners should know), competency-based training modules that address topics related to regulatory responsibilities of public health practitioners (e.g., assuring compliance with codes and regulations governing housing, retail food safety, private water supplies, hazardous and solid waste, on-site wastewater systems, etc.), public health surveillance, case investigation, disease prevention, health promotion, and emergency preparedness. The replicable model incorporates what is known about best practices for online training and maximizes available resources in the interests of sustainability.

Structural and organizational characteristics associated with performance of essential public health services in small jurisdictions: findings from a statewide study in Massachusetts.

BACKGROUND: This study examined jurisdictional, organizational, and structural characteristics associated with capacity to deliver 10 essential public health services (EPHS) in Massachusetts, a state where a majority of local public health departments serve small municipalities. DESIGN: A survey was administered to local health directors or board of health chairs. MEASURES: The main outcome of the study was capacity to perform EPHS, measured by a 25-item screening tool. RESULTS: Seventy percent of the 351 boards of health in Massachusetts participated in the study. Greatest capacity was demonstrated in EPHS 2 (Diagnose and Investigate Health Problems) and EPHS 6 (Enforce Laws and Regulations). The capacity to perform the 8 other essential services was limited. Bivariate analysis indicates that overall capacity to perform EPHS is significantly associated with population size, poverty rate, annual municipal budget, and perceived understanding of the roles and responsibilities of local boards of health among elected municipal officials. The latter was the strongest predictor of overall capacity in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Findings are aligned with studies examining factors associated with capacity to perform EPHS in large public health jurisdictions. The results suggest that one strategy for improving capacity to perform EPHS in smaller jurisdictions is to educate elected municipal leaders about the responsibilities of local health officials. Clarification regarding the role small jurisdictions with limited resources can play to ensure the equitable delivery of essential public health services and a strategy for measuring their contributions is important, especially as the national public health accreditation program gains momentum in the United States.