[Unilateral spinal anaesthesia in elderly patient for hip trauma: a pilot study]. / Rachianesthésie hypobare unilatérale chez le sujet âgé pour la chirurgie traumatique de la hanche: étude pilote.

INTRODUCTION: Fractured neck of femur is encountered more frequently as life expectancy increases. All anaesthetic techniques aim to avoid deleterious fall in arterial blood pressure. The haemodynamic effects of hypobaric unilateral spinal anaesthesia have been rarely assessed in patients over 80 year's old. This study aims to do that in a prospective manner. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled. Following a preload with HES 240/0.576 % (Hesteril) (5 ml/kg) and the administration of an iliofascial block, patients were placed in the lateral decubitus position, operative side uppermost. 3.5 ml of 0.12% hypobaric bupivacaine was administered intrathecally at a rate of 0.25 ml/second. Patients were kept in position for 15 minutes. Systolic, mean and diastolic arterial pressures, heart rate, SaO2 % and ephedrine consumption were recorded at five minutes intervals as was the rate of onset, height and duration of sensory and motor block and extent of bilateralization. Patient and surgeon satisfaction scores were also recorded. RESULTS: No significant changes in systolic, mean and diastolic pressures, or SaO2 % occurred. Median onset times of sensory and motor block were 8+/-5 and 16+/-7 minutes on the operative side and 30+/-15 and 36+/-15 minutes on the contralateral side in those with bilateralization, respectively. The maximum height of sensory block was T6 for sept patients, T8 for huit patients and T8-T10 for the remainder. Mean duration of sensory and motor block was 134+/-26 and 119+/-24 minutes on the operative side and 100+/-26 and 98+/-25 minutes on the contralateral side, respectively. In 12 patients (48%) bilateralization of their block occurred. Patients and surgeons rated the technique highly. CONCLUSION: Hypobaric unilateral spinal anaesthesia is a simple technique, produces satisfactory operative conditions and induces very little haemodynamic change in the elderly population.

Postoperative analgesia after total knee replacement: the effect of an obturator nerve block added to the femoral 3-in-1 nerve block.

Femoral nerve block (FNB) does not consistently produce anesthesia of the obturator nerve. In this single-blind, randomized, controlled study we added a selective obturator nerve block (ONB) to FNB to analyze its influence on postoperative analgesia after total knee replacement (TKR). Before general anesthesia, 90 patients undergoing TKR received FNB (Group 1), FNB and selective ONB (Group 2), or placebo FNB (Group 3). Postoperative analgesia was further provided by morphine IV via patient-controlled analgesia. Analgesic efficacy and side effects were recorded in the first 6 h after surgery. Adductor strength decreased by 18% +/- 9% in Group 1 and by 78% +/- 22% in Group 2 (P < 0.0001). Total morphine consumption was reduced in Group 2 compared with Groups 1 and 3 (P < or = 0.0001). Patients in Group 2 reported lower pain scores than those in Groups 1 and 3 (P = 0.0003). The incidence of nausea was more frequent in Groups 1 and 3 (P = 0.01). We conclude that FNB does not produce complete anesthesia of the obturator nerve. Single-shot FNB does not provide additional benefits on pain at rest over opioids alone in the early postoperative period. The addition of an ONB to FNB improves postoperative analgesia after TKR.

Sufentanil does not prolong the duration of analgesia in a mepivacaine brachial plexus block: a dose response study.

UNLABELLED: To date, results of studies evaluating the efficacy of opioids and local anesthetic combinations in the brachial plexus are inconclusive. We examined whether increasing sufentanil in doses of 5, 10, and 20 microg decreased onset time or increased duration of an axillary brachial plexus block. Ninety-two patients scheduled for carpal tunnel release under axillary brachial plexus block were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomized to receive axillary plexus block with 40 mL 1.5% mepivacaine and saline (Group 1), sufentanil 5 microg (Group 2), 10 microg (Group 3), or 20 microg (Group 4). Onset and duration of sensory and motor block were measured. Opioid-related side effects were recorded. The addition of sufentanil did not improve speed of onset or increase the duration of sensory or motor block. Paradoxically, duration of sensory and motor block was longest in the control group: sensory, 241 min (188-284) and motor, 234 min (128-305), and decreased with increasing doses of sufentanil in Group 4: sensory, 216 min (115-315) and motor, 172 min (115-260) (P < 0.05). Side effects occurred in 55% of patients belonging to Groups 2 and 4, and in 60% of the patients in Group 3. In contrast, only 10% of the patients reported side effects in the control group. We conclude that sufentanil added to mepivacaine does not increase the onset or prolong the duration of an axillary plexus block. Furthermore, the addition of sufentanil was associated with a frequent incidence of side effects. IMPLICATIONS: This study demonstrates that the addition of sufentanil in a dose-dependent manner to 1.5% mepivacaine in the axillary plexus does not improve onset or duration of blockade, and that this admixture is associated with an increased incidence of side effects.

The lateral approach to the sciatic nerve at the popliteal fossa: one or two injections?

UNLABELLED: It has not been proven whether one or multiple nerve stimulations and injections provide a higher rate of complete sensory block in both major sciatic nerve sensory distributions below the knee when a popliteal sciatic nerve block is performed using the lateral approach. This prospective, randomized, single-blinded study compared the success rate of the sciatic nerve block using this approach when one or both major components of this nerve (i.e., tibial nerve and common peroneal nerves) are stimulated in 50 patients undergoing foot or ankle surgery. In Group 1 STIM, 24 patients received a single injection of 20 mL of a mixture of 2% lidocaine and 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine after foot inversion had been elicited. In Group 2 STIM (n = 26), 10 mL of the same solution was injected after stimulation of each sciatic nerve component. For patients with complete sensory motor block, there was no difference in onset between groups. However, Group 2 STIM showed a greater success rate compared with the Group 1 STIM (2 STIM: 88% vs 1 STIM :54%; P = 0.007). When two stimulations were used, the onset time of anesthesia in the cutaneous distribution of the common peroneal nerves was shorter than in the tibial nerve (17.5 vs 30 min; P < 0.0001). We conclude that a two-stimulation technique provides a better success rate than a single-injection technique when a popliteal sciatic nerve block is performed using the lateral approach with 20 mL of local anesthetic. IMPLICATIONS: A better success rate is achieved with a double stimulation technique than with a single injection for the sciatic nerve block via the lateral approach at the popliteal fossa when 20 mL of local anesthetics is used.