Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Neuron ; 95(3): 623-638.e4, 2017 Aug 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28712652

ABSTRACT

How experiences during development cause long-lasting changes in sensory circuits and affect behavior in mature animals are poorly understood. Here we establish a novel system for mechanistic analysis of the plasticity of developing neural circuits by showing that sensory experience during development alters nociceptive behavior and circuit physiology in Drosophila larvae. Despite the convergence of nociceptive and mechanosensory inputs on common second-order neurons (SONs), developmental noxious input modifies transmission from nociceptors to their SONs, but not from mechanosensors to the same SONs, which suggests striking sensory pathway specificity. These SONs activate serotonergic neurons to inhibit nociceptor-to-SON transmission; stimulation of nociceptors during development sensitizes nociceptor presynapses to this feedback inhibition. Our results demonstrate that, unlike associative learning, which involves inputs from two sensory pathways, sensory pathway-specific plasticity in the Drosophila nociceptive circuit is in part established through feedback modulation. This study elucidates a novel mechanism that enables pathway-specific plasticity in sensory systems. VIDEO ABSTRACT.


Subject(s)
Afferent Pathways/physiology , Behavior, Animal/physiology , Nerve Net/growth & development , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Nociceptors/metabolism , Serotonergic Neurons/metabolism , Animals , Drosophila melanogaster
3.
J Neurosci ; 35(42): 14251-9, 2015 Oct 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26490864

ABSTRACT

Neurons typically assume multipolar, bipolar, or unipolar morphologies. Little is known about the mechanisms underlying the development of these basic morphological types. Here, we show that the Krüppel-like transcription factor Dar1 determines the multipolar morphology of postmitotic neurons in Drosophila. Dar1 is specifically expressed in multipolar neurons and loss of dar1 gradually converts multipolar neurons into the bipolar or unipolar morphology without changing neuronal identity. Conversely, misexpression of Dar1 or its mammalian homolog in unipolar and bipolar neurons causes them to assume multipolar morphologies. Dar1 regulates the expression of several dynein genes and nuclear distribution protein C (nudC), which is an essential component of a specialized dynein complex that positions the nucleus in a cell. We further show that these genes are required for Dar1-induced multipolar neuron morphology. Dar1 likely functions as a terminal selector gene for the basic layout of neuron morphology by regulating both dendrite extension and the dendrite-nucleus coupling. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The three basic morphological types of neurons--unipolar, bipolar, and multipolar--are important for information processing and wiring of neural circuits. Little progress has been made toward understanding the molecular and cellular programs that generate these types since their discovery over a century ago. It is generally assumed that basic morphological types of neurons are determined by the number of dendrites growing out from the cell body. Here, we show that this model alone is insufficient. We introduce the positioning of nucleus as a critical factor in this process and report that the transcription factor Dar1 determines multipolar neuron morphology in postmitotic neurons by regulating genes involved in nuclear positioning.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental/genetics , Neurons/cytology , Neurons/physiology , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled/metabolism , Receptors, Neuropeptide/metabolism , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Cell Cycle/genetics , Drosophila , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Dyneins/genetics , Dyneins/metabolism , Green Fluorescent Proteins/genetics , Green Fluorescent Proteins/metabolism , Microscopy, Confocal , Peripheral Nerves/cytology , RNA Interference/physiology , RNA, Messenger , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled/genetics , Receptors, Neuropeptide/genetics
4.
PLoS Biol ; 12(9): e1001959, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25268747

ABSTRACT

Synchronized neuronal activity is vital for complex processes like behavior. Circadian pacemaker neurons offer an unusual opportunity to study synchrony as their molecular clocks oscillate in phase over an extended timeframe (24 h). To identify where, when, and how synchronizing signals are perceived, we first studied the minimal clock neural circuit in Drosophila larvae, manipulating either the four master pacemaker neurons (LNvs) or two dorsal clock neurons (DN1s). Unexpectedly, we found that the PDF Receptor (PdfR) is required in both LNvs and DN1s to maintain synchronized LNv clocks. We also found that glutamate is a second synchronizing signal that is released from DN1s and perceived in LNvs via the metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluRA). Because simultaneously reducing Pdfr and mGluRA expression in LNvs severely dampened Timeless clock protein oscillations, we conclude that the master pacemaker LNvs require extracellular signals to function normally. These two synchronizing signals are released at opposite times of day and drive cAMP oscillations in LNvs. Finally we found that PdfR and mGluRA also help synchronize Timeless oscillations in adult s-LNvs. We propose that differentially timed signals that drive cAMP oscillations and synchronize pacemaker neurons in circadian neural circuits will be conserved across species.


Subject(s)
Circadian Clocks/genetics , Cyclic AMP/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Neurons/metabolism , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled/genetics , Receptors, Metabotropic Glutamate/genetics , Animals , Circadian Rhythm/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation , Glutamic Acid/metabolism , Larva/genetics , Larva/metabolism , Neurons/cytology , Neuropeptides/metabolism , Photoperiod , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled/metabolism , Receptors, Metabotropic Glutamate/metabolism , Signal Transduction
5.
J Neurophysiol ; 108(2): 684-96, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22539819

ABSTRACT

Drosophila melanogaster is a valuable model system for the neural basis of complex behavior, but an inability to routinely interrogate physiologic connections within central neural networks of the fly brain remains a fundamental barrier to progress in the field. To address this problem, we have introduced a simple method of measuring functional connectivity based on the independent expression of the mammalian P2X2 purinoreceptor and genetically encoded Ca(2+) and cAMP sensors within separate genetically defined subsets of neurons in the adult brain. We show that such independent expression is capable of specifically rendering defined sets of neurons excitable by pulses of bath-applied ATP in a manner compatible with high-resolution Ca(2+) and cAMP imaging in putative follower neurons. Furthermore, we establish that this approach is sufficiently sensitive for the detection of excitatory and modulatory connections deep within larval and adult brains. This technically facile approach can now be used in wild-type and mutant genetic backgrounds to address functional connectivity within neuronal networks governing a wide range of complex behaviors in the fly. Furthermore, the effectiveness of this approach in the fly brain suggests that similar methods using appropriate heterologous receptors might be adopted for other widely used model systems.


Subject(s)
Brain Mapping/methods , Brain/physiology , Drosophila melanogaster/physiology , Molecular Imaging/methods , Nerve Net/physiology , Neural Pathways/physiology , Animals
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...