Idiopathic pediatric nasal septal and epidural abscess: A case report and review of the literature.

Nasal septal abscess is an uncommon otolaryngologic condition with little reported in the literature. Most commonly arising secondary to hematoma, idiopathic abscess formation is rare. A previously healthy 13-year-old male with no preceding nasal hematoma or trauma presented with rhinorrhea, nasal pain, and obstruction. Initial incision and drainage were not curative; the patient returned to care with complaints of new-onset headache. Neuroimaging revealed abscess recurrence alongside pansinusitis and epidural empyema. The patient was transferred to a tertiary care center for joint otolaryngologic and neurosurgical care. The patient's postoperative course was uncomplicated. Nasal septal abscesses have become increasingly uncommon, but they still occur. Prompt treatment is warranted to mitigate the potential risk of further intracranial spread and facial deformity, as seen in this case.

Best practice: quality assessment outcomes of the Practice Enhancement Program among family physicians in Saskatchewan, Canada.

Increased family physician workloads have strained primary care. The objective of this study was to describe the frequency and types of quality concerns identified among Saskatchewan's family physicians, changes in these concerns over time, associated physician characteristics, and recommendations made for improvement. In this repeated cross-sectional study (1997-2020), we examined family physician assessment reports from the Saskatchewan Practice Enhancement Program, a mandatory practice review strategy, for quality concerns on three outcomes: care, medical record, and facility. We recorded demographic and practice characteristics, the presence or absence of quality concerns, and the type of recommendations made. Concern incidence was calculated both overall and across subperiods, and three outcome-specific multiple logistic regression models were developed. Recommendations made were quantified, and their nature was evaluated using thematic analysis. Among 824 assessments, 20.8% identified concerns, with a statistically significant increase in 2015-20 over earlier years (14.2% versus 43.4%, P < .001). Corresponding proportions also significantly increased within each quality outcome (6.0%-37.1%, P < .001 for care concerns; 12.7%-19.6%, P = .03 for medical record concerns; 3.9%-21.0%, P < .001 for facility concerns). We found statistically significant adjusted associations between care concerns and both urban location [odds ratio (OR): 2.2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30, 3.8] and international medical training (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.34, 4.2); facility concerns and solo practice (OR: 2.5 95% CI: 1.10, 5.7); and medical record concerns and male gender (OR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.09, 3.3), solo practice (OR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.7), and increased age. Reflecting a statistically significant interaction found between age as a continuous covariate and time period, older physicians were more likely to have a medical record concern in later years (OR: 1.072; 95% CI: 1.026, 1.120) compared to earlier ones (OR: 1.021; 95% CI: 1.001, 1.043). Among physicians where a concern was identified, recommendations most frequently pertained to documentation (91.2%), chronic disease management (78.2%), cumulative patient profiles (62.9%), laboratory investigations (53.5%), medications (51.8%), and emergency preparedness (51.2%). A concerning and increasing proportion of family physicians have quality gaps, with identifiable factors and recurring recommendations. These findings provide direction for strategic support development.

Assessment of the reliability of virtual preanesthetic airway evaluation compared to traditional in-person airway evaluation: a prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Airway evaluation is a fundamental component of the preanesthetic examination. Virtual care has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to assess the reliability of a virtual preanesthetic airway evaluation compared with a traditional in-person airway evaluation. METHODS: This prospective observational study compared the inter-rater agreement of an in-person airway evaluation performed by a consultant anesthesiologist with a virtual airway evaluation (VAE) performed by consultant anesthesiologists and medical students. The airway evaluation was completed using a comprehensive airway evaluation and scoring tool. The primary outcome was the inter-rater agreement of total scores between in-person anesthesiologist airway evaluations and the VAEs of both the anesthesiologists and medical students, assessed using Cohen's Kappa (CK). Secondary outcomes included the inter-rater agreement for each airway evaluation component between the in-person anesthesiologists and both the anesthesiologist and medical student VAEs, assessed using prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted Kappa. RESULTS: One hundred out of 111 participants completed all three evaluations. The in-person anesthesiologist airway evaluations had fair and good levels of agreement of total scores with the VAEs of the anesthesiologists (CK, 0.21; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.07 to 0.34) and the medical students (CK, 0.74; 97.5% CI, 0.62 to 0.86), respectively. One participant was reported to have a difficult intubation. CONCLUSION: Virtual airway evaluations performed by anesthesiologists and medical students had fair and good inter-rater agreement, respectively, with in-person anesthesiologist airway evaluations. Further study with a focus on patients with difficult airways is required to define the predictive value of VAEs regarding difficult intubations.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'évaluation des voies aériennes constitue un élément fondamental de l'examen préanesthésique. Les soins prodigués virtuellement ont augmenté pendant la pandémie de COVID-19. Nous avons tenté d'évaluer la fiabilité d'une évaluation préanesthésique virtuelle des voies aériennes par rapport à une évaluation traditionnelle en personne. MéTHODE: Cette étude observationnelle prospective a comparé la concordance inter-observateurs d'une évaluation des voies aériennes en personne effectuée par un anesthésiologiste avec une évaluation virtuelle des voies aériennes (EVVA) réalisée par des anesthésiologistes et des étudiants en médecine. L'évaluation des voies aériennes a été réalisée à l'aide d'un outil d'évaluation et de notation des voies aériennes. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la concordance inter-observateurs des scores totaux entre les évaluations des voies aériennes réalisées par des anesthésiologistes en personne et les EVVA effectuées par des anesthésiologistes et des étudiants en médecine, évaluée à l'aide du coefficient Kappa de Cohen (CK). Les critères d'évaluation secondaires comprenaient la concordance inter-observateurs pour chaque composante de l'évaluation des voies aériennes entre les anesthésiologistes en personne et les anesthésiologistes et étudiants en médecine ayant réalisé les EVVA, évaluée à l'aide d'un coefficient de Kappa ajusté pour la prévalence et les biais. RéSULTATS: Cent des 111 participants ont complété les trois évaluations. Les évaluations des voies aériennes par des anesthésiologistes en personne présentaient des niveaux de concordance des scores totaux fidèles et bons par rapport aux EVVA réalisées par les anesthésiologistes (CK, 0,21; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 97,5 %, 0,07 à 0,34) et les étudiants en médecine (CK, 0,74; IC 97,5 %, 0,62 à 0,86), respectivement. Une intubation difficile a été rapportée pour un participant. CONCLUSION: Les évaluations virtuelles des voies aériennes réalisées par des anesthésiologistes et des étudiants en médecine avaient une concordance inter-observateurs fidèle et bonne avec les évaluations des voies aériennes réalisées en personne par des anesthésiologistes. Des recherches plus approfondies axées sur les patients présentant une prise en charge difficile des voies aériennes sont nécessaires pour définir la valeur prédictive des EVVA dans un contexte d'intubations difficiles.