Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 42
Filter
1.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 32(2): 124-132, 2022 Apr 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32856595

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab has proven to be an effective treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in clinical trials. However, real-world experience with dupilumab in a broader population is limited. METHODS: The study population comprised adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD, defined as an Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI) score of 24 or higher, treated with dupilumab at 10 Italian teaching hospitals. We analyzed physician-reported outcome measures (EASI), patient-reported outcome measures (pruritus and sleep score, Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI]), and serological markers (IgE and eosinophil count) after 16 weeks. RESULTS: We enrolled 543 patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Two patients (0.4%) discontinued treatment. The median (IQR) change from baseline to 16 weeks of treatment in the EASI score was -87.5 (22.0) (P<.001). The EASI-50, EASI-75, and EASI-90 response rates were 98.1%, 81.5%, and 50.8% after 16 weeks. At 16 weeks, 93.0% of the patients had achieved a 4-point or higher improvement in DLQI from baseline. During treatment with dupilumab, 12.2% of the patients developed conjunctivitis, and total IgE decreased significantly (P<.001). Interestingly, in the multivariate logistic regression model, the risk of developing dupilumab-related conjunctivitis was associated with early onset of AD (OR, 2.25; 95%CI, 1.07-4.70; P=.03) and presence of eosinophilia (OR, 1.91; 95%CI, 1.05-3.39; P=.03). CONCLUSION: This is the broadest real-life study in AD patients treated with dupilumab to date. We observed more significant improvements induced by dupilumab in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD than those reported in clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis , Dermatitis, Atopic , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Humans , Immunoglobulin E , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
2.
J. investig. allergol. clin. immunol ; 32(2): 124-132, 2022. tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-203902

ABSTRACT

Background: Dupilumab has proven to be an effective treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in clinical trials. However, real-world experience with dupilumab in a broader population is limited.Methods: The study population comprised adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD, defined as an Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI) score of 24 or higher, treated with dupilumab at 10 Italian teaching hospitals. We analyzed physician-reported outcome measures (EASI), patient-reported outcome measures (pruritus and sleep score, Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI]), and serological markers (IgE and eosinophil count) after 16 weeks.Results: We enrolled 543 patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Two patients (0.4%) discontinued treatment. The median (IQR) change from baseline to 16 weeks of treatment in the EASI score was –87.5 (22.0) (P<.001). The EASI-50, EASI-75, and EASI-90 response rates were 98.1%, 81.5%, and 50.8% after 16 weeks. At 16 weeks, 93.0% of the patients had achieved a 4-point or higher improvement in DLQI from baseline. During treatment with dupilumab, 12.2% of the patients developed conjunctivitis, and total IgE decreased significantly (P<.001). Interestingly, in the multivariate logistic regression model, the risk of developing dupilumab-related conjunctivitis was associated with early onset of AD (OR, 2.25; 95%CI, 1.07-4.70; P=.03) and presence of eosinophilia (OR, 1.91; 95%CI, 1.05-3.39; P=.03).Conclusion: This is the broadest real-life study in AD patients treated with dupilumab to date. We observed more significant improvements induced by dupilumab in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD than those reported in clinical trials (AU)


Antecedentes: Se ha demostrado en ensayos clínicos que dupilumab es un tratamiento eficaz para pacientes con dermatitis atópica (DA)de moderada a grave. Sin embargo, la experiencia en vida real con dupilumab y con gran número de pacientes es más limitada.Métodos: Se incluyeron en el estudio pacientes adultos con DA de moderada a grave, definida como un índice de gravedad del área deeccema (EASI) de 24 o más, tratados con dupilumab en diez centros universitarios italianos. Se analizaron parámetros medidos por elmédico (EASI), por el paciente (puntuación de prurito y sueño, índice de calidad de vida dermatológica DLQI) y marcadores serológicos(inmunoglobulina IgE y recuento de eosinófilos en sangre) a las 16 semanas de tratamiento.Resultados: Se incluyeron 543 pacientes con DA de moderada a grave. Dos pacientes (0,4%) interrumpieron el tratamiento. La mediana± cambio porcentual intercuartílico desde el inicio hasta las 16 semanas de tratamiento en la puntuación EASI fue de -87,5 ± 22,0(p <0,001). Las tasas de respuesta de EASI-50, EASI-75 y EASI-90 fueron del 98,1%, 81,5% y 50,8% después de 16 semanas. En lasemana 16, el 93% de los pacientes habían logrado una mejora de 4 puntos o más en el DLQI desde el inicio. Durante el tratamiento condupilumab, el 12,2% de los pacientes desarrollaron conjuntivitis y la IgE total disminuyó significativamente (p <0,001). Curiosamente, enel modelo de regresión logística multivariante, el riesgo de desarrollar conjuntivitis relacionada con dupilumab se asoció con la aparicióntemprana de DA (OR, 2,25; IC del 95%, 1,07–4,70; p = 0,03) y presencia de eosinofilia (OR, 1,91; IC del 95%, 1,05–3,39; p = 0,03).Conclusión: Hasta la fecha, este es el estudio más amplio en vida real en pacientes con DA tratados con dupilumab. Se observaron mejorassignificativas y más importantes que las notificadas en los ensayos clínicos realizados con dupilumab (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Risk Factors , Prognosis , Immunoglobulin E , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Conjunctivitis/chemically induced
7.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 29(3): 180-205, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30183660

ABSTRACT

Hymenoptera venom allergy is an epidemiologically underestimated condition and a major cause of morbidity worldwide. Preventing future allergic reactions in patients who experience a systemic reaction is based on the correct management of the emergency followed by an accurate diagnosis, prescription of adrenaline autoinjectors, and, where indicated, specific venom immunotherapy. Some epidemiological studies highlight our poor knowledge of this disease and the frequent inadequacy of its management. Moreover, they emphasize the importance of such a life-saving treatment as specific immunotherapy. The availability of high-quality hymenoptera venom extracts for diagnostic and therapeutic use has dramatically improved the prognosis and quality of life of allergic patients. Subcutaneous venom immunotherapy is currently the most effective form of allergen-based immunotherapy, with a carry-over effect lasting up to several years after its interruption. This report on the management of hymenoptera venom-allergic children and adults was prepared by a panel of Italian experts. The main objective of this consensus document is to review the scientific evidence related to diagnosis, therapy, and management of patients allergic to hymenoptera venom. Thus, we can improve our knowledge of the disease and promote good clinical practices. The present document provides practical suggestions for correct diagnosis, prescription of emergency therapy and immunotherapy, and strategies for patient care.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Arthropod Venoms/immunology , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Insect Bites and Stings/diagnosis , Adult , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Anaphylaxis/prevention & control , Animals , Child , Humans , Hymenoptera/immunology , Hypersensitivity/complications , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Immunoglobulin E/metabolism , Insect Bites and Stings/complications , Insect Bites and Stings/therapy , Italy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality of Life
8.
J. investig. allergol. clin. immunol ; 29(3): 180-205, 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-184085

ABSTRACT

Hymenoptera venom allergy is an epidemiologically underestimated condition and a major cause of morbidity worldwide. Preventing future allergic reactions in patients who experience a systemic reaction is based on the correct management of the emergency followed by an accurate diagnosis, prescription of adrenaline autoinjectors, and, where indicated, specific venom immunotherapy. Some epidemiological studies highlight our poor knowledge of this disease and the frequent inadequacy of its management. Moreover, they emphasize the importance of such a life-saving treatment as specific immunotherapy. The availability of high-quality hymenoptera venom extracts for diagnostic and therapeutic use has dramatically improved the prognosis and quality of life of allergic patients. Subcutaneous venom immunotherapy is currently the most effective form of allergen-based immunotherapy, with a carry-over effect lasting up to several years after its interruption. This report on the management of hymenoptera venom-allergic children and adults was prepared by a panel of Italian experts. The main objective of this consensus document is to review the scientific evidence related to diagnosis, therapy, and management of patients allergic to hymenoptera venom. Thus, we can improve our knowledge of the disease and promote good clinical practices. The present document provides practical suggestions for correct diagnosis, prescription of emergency therapy and immunotherapy, and strategies for patient care


La alergia al veneno de himenópteros es una condición subestimada epidemiológicamente que representa una causa importante de morbilidad en todo el mundo. La prevención de reacciones alérgicas futuras en pacientes que han desarrollado una reacción sistémica se basa en el manejo correcto de la emergencia, seguido de un diagnóstico correcto, la prescripción de autoinyectores de adrenalina y, en el caso de estar indicada, la prescripción de inmunoterapia específica con veneno (VIT). Varios estudios epidemiológicos destacan el escaso conocimiento de esta enfermedad y un frecuente tratamiento insuficiente. Además, enfatizan la importancia de la inmunoterapia específica, un tratamiento que puede salvar la vida del paciente. La disponibilidad de extractos de veneno de himenóptera de alta calidad para uso diagnóstico y terapéutico ha mejorado drásticamente el pronóstico y la calidad de vida de estos enfermos. La VIT subcutánea representa la forma más efectiva de inmunoterapia con alérgeno actualmente disponible, con una eficacia persistente que dura hasta varios años después de su interrupción. Este consenso sobre la evaluación clínica tanto de niños como de adultos alérgicos al veneno de himenópteros ha sido elaborado por un panel de expertos italianos. Su objetivo principal es revisar la evidencia científica disponible en el diagnóstico, la terapia y la evaluación clínica de los pacientes alérgicos al veneno de himenópteros con el propósito de mejorar el conocimiento sobre esta enfermedad y promover buenas prácticas clínicas. Se incluyen sugerencias prácticas para un diagnóstico correcto, la prescripción de terapia de emergencia e inmunoterapia, así como estrategias para el manejo de los pacientes


Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Adult , Arthropod Venoms/adverse effects , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/therapy , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Hymenoptera/pathogenicity , Insect Bites and Stings/complications , Patient Safety , Treatment Outcome
9.
Clin Mol Allergy ; 16: 16, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30002605

ABSTRACT

Adverse reactions (ARs) to drugs administered during general anesthesia may be very severe and life-threatening, with a mortality rate ranging from 3 to 9%. The adverse reactions to drugs may be IgE and non-IgE-mediated. Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) represent the first cause of perioperative reactions during general anesthesia followed by latex, antibiotics, hypnotic agents, opioids, colloids, dyes and antiseptics (chlorhexidine). All these substances (i.e. NMBA, anesthetics, antibiotics, latex devices) may cause severe systemic non-IgE-mediated reactions or fatal anaphylactic events even in the absence of any evident risk factor in the patient's anamnesis. For this reason, in order to minimize perioperative anaphylactic reactions, it is important to have rapid, specific, sensitive in vitro diagnostic tests able to confirm the clinical diagnosis of acute anaphylaxis.

11.
J Viral Hepat ; 24(9): 768-775, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28211154

ABSTRACT

Killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) regulate the activation of natural killer cells through their interaction with human leucocyte antigens (HLA). KIR and HLA loci are highly polymorphic, and certain HLA-KIR combinations have been found to protect against viral infections. In this study, we analysed whether the KIR/HLA repertoire may influence the course of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Fifty-seven subjects with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), 44 subjects with resolved HBV infection and 60 healthy uninfected controls (HC) were genotyped for KIR and their HLA ligands. The frequency of the HLA-A-Bw4 ligand group was higher in CHB (58%) than subjects with resolved infection (23%) (crude OR, 4.67; P<.001) and HC (10%) (crude OR, 12.38; P<.001). Similar results were obtained for the HLA-C2 ligand group, more frequent in CHB (84%), than subjects with resolved infection (70%) (crude OR, 2.24; P<.10) and HC (60%) (crude OR, 3.56; P<.01). Conversely, the frequency of KIR2DL3 was lower in CHB (81%) than in subjects with resolved infection (98%) (crude OR, 0.10; P<.05). These results suggest a detrimental role of HLA-A-Bw4 and HLA-C2 groups, which are associated with the development of CHB, and a protective role of KIR2DL3. A stepwise variable selection procedure, based on multiple logistic regression analysis, identified these three predictive variables as the most relevant, featuring high specificity (90.9%) and positive predictive value (87.5%) for the development of CHB. Our results suggest that a combination of KIR/HLA gene/alleles is able to predict the outcome of HBV infection.


Subject(s)
Genetic Predisposition to Disease , HLA-A Antigens/genetics , HLA-B Antigens/genetics , HLA-C Antigens/genetics , Hepatitis B, Chronic/genetics , Receptors, KIR2DL3/genetics , Adult , Aged , Female , Genotype , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
12.
Allergy ; 72(5): 691-704, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27926981

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Guidelines and position papers indicate that allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease-modifying treatment, including prevention of the onset of new allergen sensitizations. However, this preventive effect was shown by only a few observational studies. Our aim was to systematically review the efficacy of AIT in preventing the onset of new allergen sensitizations. METHODS: Computerized bibliographic searches of Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (through June 2015) were supplemented with manual searches of reference lists. Observational studies or randomized controlled trials with a long-term observation period were included. Paired reviewers extracted data about study characteristics and assessed biases. The end point was the risk difference in the onset of new allergen sensitizations between patients treated with AIT and pharmacotherapy. The strength of the evidence was graded based on the risk of bias, consistency, and magnitude of effect, according to the GRADE Working Group's guide. RESULTS: Eighteen studies (1049 children, 10 057 adults) met the inclusion criteria. The risk of bias was high in all but one study. Low evidence supports the position that AIT prevents the onset of new allergen sensitizations, with 10 of 18 studies reporting a reduction in the onset of new sensitizations in patients treated with AIT vs placebo. Small studies and studies with a shorter follow-up showed the highest benefit of AIT. CONCLUSIONS: The overall evidence provides a low-grade level of the evidence supporting the efficacy of AIT in preventing the onset of new allergen sensitizations, but high-quality studies could change this estimate.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Desensitization, Immunologic , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Allergens/administration & dosage , Animals , Desensitization, Immunologic/adverse effects , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Humans , Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Hypersensitivity/prevention & control , Immunization , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Odds Ratio , Treatment Outcome
13.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol ; 48(5): 182-7, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27608474

ABSTRACT

Background. In chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) first-line therapy with an antihistamine-based regimen may not achieve satisfactory control in patients. Thus, a continuing need exists for effective and safe treatments for refractory CSU. Aim. To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of an intake of a combination of 2 probiotics (Lactobacillus salivarius LS01 and Bifidobacterium breve BR03) in patients with CSU who remain symptomatic despite concomitant H1-antihistamine therapy. Methods. This report analyzes the effects of therapy with two probiotic strains on the clinical progress of 52 unselected patients with difficulty to treat CSU underwent to medical examination in two Italian specialist urticaria Clinics between September 2013 and September 2014. A mixture of Lactobacillus LS01 and Bifidobacterium BR03 were administered in each patient twice daily for 8 weeks. To evaluate patients' improvement with probiotics, urticaria activity score over 7 days (UAS7) was used at baseline and at week 8 in addition to a 5-question urticaria quality of life questionnaire. Results. Fifty-two patients with CSU were included in this study (10 male and 42 female, age range 19-72 years). Mean disease duration was 1.5 years. Fourteen patients discontinued treatment, so evaluable population consisted of 38 patients. Nine of the 38 patients experienced mild clinical improvement during probiotic treatment (23.7%); one patient reported significant clinical improvement (2.6%) and one patient had complete remission of urticaria (2.6%). Twenty-seven patients did not have improvement in symptoms (71.1%). No side effects during the course of therapy were reported. Conclusions. A combination of Lactobacillus salivarius LS01 and Bifidobacterium breve BR03 administered twice daily for 8 weeks might reduce the symptoms scores and improve quality of life scores in a part of patients with CSU who remained symptomatic despite treatment with H1 antihistamine mostly in subjects with allergic rhinitis.


Subject(s)
Bifidobacterium breve/physiology , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/therapeutic use , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Ligilactobacillus salivarius/physiology , Probiotics , Urticaria/therapy , Adult , Aged , Chronic Disease , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/adverse effects , Humans , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Hypersensitivity/microbiology , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Probiotics/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Remission Induction , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Urticaria/diagnosis , Urticaria/immunology , Urticaria/microbiology , Young Adult
14.
Int J Cardiol ; 222: 509-514, 2016 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27505343

ABSTRACT

The role and importance of thienopyridines such as ticlopidine, clopidogrel, and prasugrel is well-established for several indications, ranging from prevention of acute coronary syndromes to percutaneous coronary interventions, where the dual antiplatelet therapy represents the gold standard to avoid denovo coronary stenosis. However, there is a significant cohort of patients with coronary artery disease who may manifest hypersensitivity reactions to thienopyridines. The examination of the various case reports from medical literature leads to identify mainly four clinical patterns of hypersensitivity to thienopyridines which involves more frequently cutaneous, hematologic, and articular tissues, therefore the kind and predominance of clinical symptoms may determine a different clinical approach to overcome or neutralize thienopyridines hypersensitivity.


Subject(s)
Allergists , Cardiologists , Disease Management , Drug Hypersensitivity/classification , Drug Hypersensitivity/therapy , Thienopyridines/classification , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Humans , Physician's Role , Thienopyridines/adverse effects
15.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 28(2): 243-50, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26661383

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multiple rapid swallowing (MRS) during high-resolution manometry (HRM) is increasingly utilized as provocative test to assess esophageal peristaltic reserve. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between MRS response and impedance and pH (MII-pH) parameters in endoscopy negative heartburn (ENH) patients. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive ENH patients, who underwent HRM and MII-pH study, with a selected MII-pH profile: abnormal MII-pH (pH+/MII+); normal MII-pH (pH-/MII-). HRM was performed with 10 wet swallows (WS) and one MRS. Mean distal contractile integral (DCI) during WS and MRS were calculated. MII-pH parameters including acid exposure time (AET), reflux events, baseline impedance levels (BI) and the efficacy of chemical clearance evaluated with the postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) index were measured. KEY RESULTS: We analyzed 103 patients: 49 MII+/pH+ (27 male), and 54 MII-/pH- (19 male). Mean age was similar between the two groups. As expected, mean AET and number of refluxes were higher in pH+/MII+ (p < 0.05). HRM was normal in all selected patients. Mean DCI-WS was similar between two groups (p = n.s.). Mean DCI-MRS- was higher in MII-/pH- vs MII+/pH+ (p < 0.05). The increase in DCI-MRS was inversely correlated with AET (-0.699; p < 0.001) and directly correlated with BI values (0.631; p < 0.001) and PSPW index (0.626; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Following MRS, patients with abnormal impedance-pH test showed suboptimal contraction response as compared with those with normal impedance-pH test. Moreover, MRS response was inversely correlated with AET and directly correlated with BI values and PSPW index.


Subject(s)
Deglutition/physiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/physiopathology , Peristalsis/physiology , Adult , Electric Impedance , Esophageal pH Monitoring , Female , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Male , Manometry , Middle Aged
16.
Dis Esophagus ; 29(2): 197-204, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25516110

ABSTRACT

A wide variety of pieces of evidence has suggested that obesity is associated with a significant increase in the risk for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms and its complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of weight loss on reflux symptoms in overweight/obese patients with proven GERD. We enrolled overweight/obese patients with typical GERD symptoms and erosive esophagitis. At baseline, patients underwent detailed reflux symptoms evaluation and anthropometric assessment, and were divided into two treatment groups: group A received proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and a personalized hypocaloric diet and aerobic exercise; and group B received PPI and a 'standard of care diet'. The dietetic treatment was considered effective if at least 10% of weight loss was achieved within 6 months. All patients were evaluated in terms of anthropometric data, GERD symptoms, and PPI use. In group A, mean body mass index (BMI) decreased from 30.3 ± 4.1 to 25.7 ± 3.1 (P < 0.05), and mean weight decreased from 82.1 ± 16.9 kg to 69.9 ± 14.4 kg (P < 0.05). In group B, there was no change in BMI and weight. Symptom perception decreased (P < 0.05) in both groups during PPI therapy, but a higher improvement was recorded in group A. In group A, PPI therapy was completely discontinued in 27/50 of the patients, and halved in 16/50. Only 7/50 continued the same PPI dosage. In group B, 22/51 halved the therapy and 29/51 maintained full dosage of therapy, but none was able to discontinue PPI due to a symptom recurrence. Overall, weight loss of at least 10% is recommended in all patients with GERD in order to boost the effect of PPI on reflux symptom relief and to reduce chronic medication use.


Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Obesity/therapy , Overweight/therapy , Proton Pump Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Weight Loss , Adult , Body Mass Index , Diet, Reducing/methods , Esophagitis/drug therapy , Esophagitis/etiology , Exercise Therapy/methods , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/complications , Obesity/physiopathology , Overweight/complications , Overweight/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...