Using pulsatility responses to breath-hold maneuvers to predict readmission rates in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device patients.

BACKGROUND: Dynamic respiratory maneuvers induce heterogenous changes to flow-pulsatility in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device patients. We evaluated the association of these pulsatility responses with patient hemodynamics and outcomes. METHODS: Responses obtained from HVAD (Medtronic) outpatients during successive weekly clinics were categorized into three ordinal groups according to the percentage reduction in flow-waveform pulsatility (peak-trough flow) upon inspiratory-breath-hold, (%∆P): (1) minimal change (%∆P ≤ 50), (2) reduced pulsatility (%∆P > 50 but <100), (3) flatline (%∆P = 100). Same-day echocardiography and right-heart-catheterization were performed. Readmissions were compared between patients with ≥1 flatline response (F-group) and those without (NF-group). RESULTS: Overall, 712 responses were obtained from 55 patients (82% male, age 56.4 ± 11.5). When compared to minimal change, reduced pulsatility and flatline responses were associated with lower central venous pressure (14.2 vs. 11.4 vs. 9.0 mm Hg, p = 0.08) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (19.8 vs. 14.3 vs. 13.0 mm Hg, p = 0.03), lower rates of ≥moderate mitral regurgitation (48% vs. 13% vs. 10%, p = 0.01), lower rates of ≥moderate right ventricular impairment (62% vs. 25% vs. 27%, p = 0.03), and increased rates of aortic valve opening (32% vs. 50% vs. 75%, p = 0.03). The F-group (n = 28) experienced numerically lower all-cause readmissions (1.51 vs. 2.79 events-per-patient-year [EPPY], hazard-ratio [HR] = 0.67, p = 0.12), reduced heart failure readmissions (0.07 vs. 0.57 EPPY, HR = 0.15, p = 0.008), and superior readmission-free survival (HR = 0.47, log-rank p = 0.04). Syncopal readmissions occurred exclusively in the F-group (0.20 vs. 0 EPPY, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Responses to inspiratory-breath-hold predicted hemodynamics and readmission risk. The impact of inspiratory-breath-hold on pulsatility can non-invasively guide hemodynamic management decisions, patient optimization, and readmission risk stratification.

Donation After Circulatory Death for Liver Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis on the Location of Life Support Withdrawal Affecting Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation using donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors is associated with inferior outcomes compared to donation after brain death (DBD). Prolonged donor warm ischemic time has been identified as the key factor responsible for this difference. Various aspects of the donor life support withdrawal procedure, including location of withdrawal and administration of antemortem heparin, are thought to play important roles in mitigating the effects of warm ischemia. However, a systematic exploration of these factors is important for more confident integration of these practices into a standard DCD protocol. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane libraries were systematically searched and 23 relevant studies identified for analysis. Donation after circulatory death recipients were stratified according to location of life support withdrawal (intensive care unit or operating theater) and use of antemortem heparin. RESULTS: Donation after circulatory death recipients had comparable 1-year patient survival to DBD recipients if the location of withdrawal of life support was the operating theater, but not if the location was the intensive care unit. Likewise, the inferior 1-year graft survival and higher incidence of ischemic cholangiopathy of DCD compared with DBD recipients were improved by withdrawal in operating theater, although higher rates of ischemic cholangiopathy and worse graft survival were still observed in DCD recipients. Furthermore, administering heparin before withdrawal of life support reduced the incidence of primary nonfunction of the allograft. CONCLUSIONS: Our evidence suggests that withdrawal in the operating theater and premortem heparin administration improve DCD liver transplant outcomes, thus allowing for the most effective usage of these valuable organs.

Primary graft failure after heart transplantation.

Primary graft failure (PGF) is a devastating complication that occurs in the immediate postoperative period following heart transplantation. It manifests as severe ventricular dysfunction of the donor graft and carries significant mortality and morbidity. In the last decade, advances in pharmacological treatment and mechanical circulatory support have improved the outlook for heart transplant recipients who develop this complication. Despite these advances in treatment, PGF is still the leading cause of death in the first 30 days after transplantation. In today's climate of significant organ shortages and growing waiting lists, transplant units worldwide have increasingly utilised "marginal donors" to try and bridge the gap between "supply and demand." One of the costs of this strategy has been an increased incidence of PGF. As the threat of PGF increases, the challenges of predicting and preventing its occurrence, as well as the identification of more effective treatment modalities, are vital areas of active research and development.

Enhanced cardioprotection of the rat heart during hypothermic storage with combined Na+ - H+ exchange inhibition and ATP-dependent potassium channel activation.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the ability of mitochondrial adenosine triphosphate-dependent potassium-channel activation to augment the protection of Na(+)-H(+) exchanger inhibition in isolated working rat hearts after 6 hours of hypothermic storage in an extracellular-based cardioplegic solution. METHODS: We treated hearts with the potassium-channel openers diazoxide (100 micromol/liter) or BMS-180448 (10 micromol/liter) or with the Na(+)-H(+) exchanger inhibitor cariporide (10 micromol/liter). Cariporide also was administered in combination with either diazoxide or BMS-180448 in 2 other treatment groups. All hearts were arrested and stored at 2 to 3 degrees C. After storage, we reperfused hearts for 10 minutes before performing work for a further 15 minutes, and then we measured and assessed cardiac function using a 2-way analysis of variance model. RESULTS: Neither diazoxide nor BMS-180448 significantly improved recovery of cardiac output. Cariporide therapy significantly improved cardiac output compared with control. However, we obtained the greatest recovery of cardiac output when we combined cariporide with either diazoxide or BMS-180448. CONCLUSIONS: Cariporide is more cardioprotective than the potassium-channel openers diazoxide and BMS-180448 after prolonged hypothermic storage. Co-administration of diazoxide or BMS-180448 with cariporide results in additive cardioprotection, with significantly improved cardiac function when compared with either treatment given alone. Such a combination could be used to improve the functional recovery of hearts stored for cardiac transplantation.

Cardioprotection by cariporide after prolonged hypothermic storage of the isolated working rat heart.

BACKGROUND: Inhibition of the sodium-hydrogen (Na(+)-H(+)) exchanger decreases the extent of ischemia-reperfusion injury in the myocardium. Inhibition may also improve preservation of hearts stored for transplantation. Our aim was to characterize the dose response and to determine optimal timing for administering cariporide, an Na(+)-H(+) exchange inhibitor, during prolonged hypothermic storage. METHODS: We used the rat isolated working-heart model to measure cardiac function. To determine the optimal dose of cariporide, hearts received either no treatment (control) or incremental doses of cariporide (1, 3.2, 10, or 30 micromol/liter) before storage and during reperfusion. Hearts were arrested with and stored in an extracellular-based cardioplegic solution at 2 to 3 degrees C for 6 hours. To determine optimal timing, we arrested a group of hearts with and stored them in a cariporide-supplemented (10 micromol/liter) cardioplegic solution but did not pre-treat them with cariporide. Finally, we treated a separate group of hearts with 10 micromol/liter cariporide before, during, and after storage. RESULTS: Recovery of cardiac function in control hearts was poor. The cardioprotective effect of cariporide was dose dependent, with maximal protection observed at a concentration of 10 micromol/liter. Storing hearts in a cariporide-supplemented cardioplegic solution did not result in better recovery of cardiac function compared with cariporide given before storage and during reperfusion. Moreover, recovery of cardiac function was significantly worse in hearts that had not been pre-treated with cariporide. CONCLUSIONS: Sodium-hydrogen-exchange inhibition with cariporide significantly protects the hypothermic ischemic rat heart, increasing cardiac function after reperfusion. The timing of cariporide administration is an important determinant of this cardioprotection.