Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Contact Dermat ; 12(2): 88-92, 2001 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11381344

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health care workers are exposed to many agents that can cause irritant or allergic contact dermatitis. Recently, much attention has been focused on latex sensitivity, which commonly causes contact urticaria. Most studies have examined the conditions of irritant or allergic contact dermatitis and contact urticaria independently. Therefore, we have little information about the possible occurrence of these conditions in the context of combined assessment including both prick and patch testing. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of irritant and allergic contact dermatitis and contact urticaria in a group of health care workers presenting with skin problems. METHODS: Retrospective review of health care workers assessed by both prick and patch testing in an occupational health clinic. RESULTS: The diagnoses included 61% with irritant contact dermatitis, 31% with allergic contact dermatitis, and 27% with contact urticaria to latex. Eleven percent had both allergic contact dermatitis related to thiuram and contact urticaria to latex. Ninety five percent were deemed to be work-related. CONCLUSION: Health care workers presenting with skin complaints should be assessed with both prick and patch testing.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Allergens/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Female , Humans , Intradermal Tests , Latex Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Male , Medical Records , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Ontario/epidemiology , Patch Tests , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies
2.
J Comp Physiol A ; 186(1): 39-43, 2000 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10659041

ABSTRACT

Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide (PACAP-38) is a peptide hormone which functions in many mammalian systems, including the nervous and digestive systems. Using in vivo behavioral studies, we have found that this hormone functions as a chemore-pellent in Tetrahymena thermophila with an EC50 of 10 nM. Cells previously adapted to PACAP-38 were found to be adapted to lysozyme and vice versa. Furthermore, the in vivo behavioral activity of PACAP-38 was blocked by addition of the anti-lysozyme receptor antibody, 5545. Chemorepellent activity of PACAP-38 was also inhibited by the addition of neomycin sulfate (inhibition constant Ki = 0.080 micromol x l(-1)), a competitive inhibitor of lysozyme binding to its receptor. PACAP-38 is a more potent and specific agonist for the lysozyme receptor than either intact lysozyme or CB2, a 24-amino acid fragment of lysozyme.


Subject(s)
Neuropeptides/pharmacology , Neurotransmitter Agents/pharmacology , Receptors, Pituitary Hormone/metabolism , Tetrahymena thermophila/drug effects , Adaptation, Physiological/drug effects , Animals , Antibodies/pharmacology , Behavior, Animal/drug effects , Cross Reactions , Muramidase/pharmacology , Neomycin/pharmacology , Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide , Protein Synthesis Inhibitors/pharmacology , Protozoan Proteins/immunology , Protozoan Proteins/metabolism , Receptors, Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide , Receptors, Pituitary Hormone/agonists , Receptors, Pituitary Hormone/immunology , Second Messenger Systems/drug effects , Signal Transduction/physiology , Tetrahymena thermophila/chemistry
3.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 80(3): 252-6, 1998 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9532974

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of allergy to natural rubber latex and potential crossreacting foods in operating room nurses. METHOD: Two hundred forty-seven operating room nurses completed a latex allergy questionnaire. They were questioned about symptoms of latex reactivity and about other allergies particularly to foods that may crossreact with latex. Informed consent was obtained and skin prick testing was performed with natural rubber latex and five latex extracts representing low (0.08 to 0.25 microgram/mL) and high (18 to 106 micrograms/mL) natural rubber latex protein gloves. Skin prick tests were done with four potentially crossreacting foods (banana, avocado, kiwi, and potato), saline, and histamine controls. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five (54.7%) nurses described allergic symptoms they attributed to latex exposure. Of these 12 (4.9%) tested positive to latex extracts alone, 12 (4.9%) tested positive to food extracts alone, and 5 (2.0%) tested positive to both latex and crossreactive foods. Three of the 17 (17.6%) nurses testing positive to latex gave no history of reactivity to latex. Indirect latex ELISA was done on the serum of skin test-positive patients with a 70.6% sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Of the nurses tested, 6.9% had positive skin prick tests to latex extracts; 17.6% of these were asymptomatic and 29.4% had associated food positive skin prick tests.


Subject(s)
Gloves, Surgical , Hypersensitivity/etiology , Latex/immunology , Nurses , Adult , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Operating Rooms , Skin Tests
4.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 24(2): 71-3, 1997 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9077719

ABSTRACT

We undertook a retrospective review of 25 patients who had undergone percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Data regarding the clinical courses were collected, and a questionnaire was administered to patients when possible; in most cases the individual responsible for care answered questions. We pinpointed concerns relevant to the decision-making process. In a substantial proportion of cases, the clinical courses subsequent to PEG were poor. Of 21 surrogates interviewed, 33% were uncertain that proceeding to nutritional support via PEG had been the right decision. Findings indicate a need to improve the process by which decisions to treat by PEG are made, ideally including better prognostic information.


Subject(s)
Gastrostomy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Decision Making , Endoscopy , Female , Gastrostomy/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pilot Projects , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies
5.
Health Values ; 13(1): 54-5, 1989.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10318177
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...