Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
2.
Surg Endosc ; 28(8): 2272-6, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24962863

ABSTRACT

Ethical considerations relevant to the implementation of new surgical technologies and techniques are explored and discussed in practical terms in this statement, including (1) How is the safety of a new technology or technique ensured?; (2) What are the timing and process by which a new technology or technique is implemented at a hospital?; (3) How are patients informed before undergoing a new technology or technique?; (4) How are surgeons trained and credentialed in a new technology or technique?; (5) How are the outcomes of a new technology or technique tracked and evaluated?; and (6) How are the responsibilities to individual patients and society at large balanced? The following discussion is presented with the intent to encourage thought and dialogue about ethical considerations relevant to the implementation of new technologies and new techniques in surgery.


Subject(s)
Diffusion of Innovation , Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Endoscopy , Ethics, Medical , Patient Safety , Credentialing , Disclosure , Education, Medical, Continuing , Endoscopy/education , Equipment Safety , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
3.
JSLS ; 18(1): 125-7, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24680155

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a relatively uncommon complication after abdominal surgery. CASE REPORT: We report an even more unusual case of PVT 10 days after an uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy, believed to be only the fourth reported case in the literature of this rare complication. CONCLUSION: Albeit extremely rare, PVT should be included in the differential diagnosis for abdominal symptoms and/or elevated hepatic function tests after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.


Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/adverse effects , Portal Vein , Venous Thrombosis/etiology , Adult , Cholelithiasis/surgery , Female , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Postoperative Complications , Venous Thrombosis/drug therapy
4.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 71(2): 357-64, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19922914

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Currently, little evidence supports computer-based simulation for ERCP training. OBJECTIVE: To determine face and construct validity of a computer-based simulator for ERCP and assess its perceived utility as a training tool. DESIGN: Novice and expert endoscopists completed 2 simulated ERCP cases by using the GI Mentor II. SETTING: Virtual Education and Surgical Simulation Laboratory, Medical College of Georgia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes included times to complete the procedure, reach the papilla, and use fluoroscopy; attempts to cannulate the papilla, pancreatic duct, and common bile duct; and number of contrast injections and complications. Subjects assessed simulator graphics, procedural accuracy, difficulty, haptics, overall realism, and training potential. RESULTS: Only when performance data from cases A and B were combined did the GI Mentor II differentiate novices and experts based on times to complete the procedure, reach the papilla, and use fluoroscopy. Across skill levels, overall opinions were similar regarding graphics (moderately realistic), accuracy (similar to clinical ERCP), difficulty (similar to clinical ERCP), overall realism (moderately realistic), and haptics. Most participants (92%) claimed that the simulator has definite training potential or should be required for training. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, single institution. CONCLUSIONS: The GI Mentor II demonstrated construct validity for ERCP based on select metrics. Most subjects thought that the simulated graphics, procedural accuracy, and overall realism exhibit face validity. Subjects deemed it a useful training tool. Study repetition involving more participants and cases may help confirm results and establish the simulator's ability to differentiate skill levels based on ERCP-specific metrics.


Subject(s)
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/instrumentation , Clinical Competence , Computer Simulation , Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , User-Computer Interface , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/methods , Educational Measurement , Female , Gastroenterology/education , Humans , Internship and Residency , Male , Probability , Sensitivity and Specificity
6.
Am Surg ; 74(8): 713-20; discussion 720, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18705572

ABSTRACT

Varied Spigelian hernia mesh repair techniques have been described, although evidence suggests laparoscopy results in less morbidity and shorter hospitalization compared with open procedures. Laparoscopic suture repair of Spigelian hernias is rarely reported. Two patients with small Spigelian hernias (< or =2 cm) were diagnosed and repaired laparoscopically using a transabdominal suture technique. Under laparoscopic guidance, a suture-passer was used to place two or three transfacial, interrupted 0 polypropylene sutures along the horizontal plane of the defect. Sutures were tied extracorporeally and closure was confirmed laparoscopically. These cases spurred a review of world literature (2001-2007) including clinical characteristics, operative techniques, and urgency of operations in Spigelian hernia patients. Data were compared using Fisher's exact test. One year postoperatively, the patients are without sequelae or recurrence. Literature review demonstrated most patients were females (P < 0.001), ranged in age from 60 to 80 years (P = 0.042), and presented with left-sided hernias (P = 0.026). Open mesh repair (182/392 cases; 47%) was the most common technique; however, increasingly articles describe laparoscopic mesh repair. Mesh-free laparoscopic suture repair is feasible and safe. This novel uncomplicated approach to small Spigelian hernias combines the benefits of laparoscopic localization, reduction, and closure without the morbidity and cost associated with foreign material.


Subject(s)
Hernia, Ventral/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Aged , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Suture Techniques , Treatment Outcome
7.
J Am Coll Surg ; 204(5): 969-74; discussion 975-6, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17481522

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Few data exist comparing medical student surgical education programs across the US and Canada. We conducted a 30-question, Web-based survey of 142 medical schools in the US and Canada about the administration of undergraduate surgical education programs at their institutions. STUDY DESIGN: From October 2005 to January 2006, 142 Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) medical schools in the US and Canada were asked to complete a 30-item, Web-based questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were compiled for all responses and data were analyzed using Student's t-test. RESULTS: One hundred two medical schools responded to the survey (90 of 125 US and 12 of 17 Canadian schools, overall response rate,=72%). The majority of surgical clerkships have between 16 and 30 students rotating at a time through 2 to 4 teaching sites. The most frequent overall clerkship duration was 8 weeks, divided most frequently between a 4- to 6-week general surgery rotation and a 4-week subspecialty rotation. There was no consensus about what services constitute general surgery rotations, although the most common subspecialty rotations were urology (68%) and orthopaedics (66%). American medical schools were more likely to use the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) subject examination for student assessment (90.9% US versus 50.0% Canadian, p < 0.05); Canadian medical schools were more likely to use an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (69.2% Canadian versus 37.7% US, p < 0.05) and other written examinations (69.2% Canadian versus 37.7% US, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variation in the structure and administration of medical student surgical education programs in the US and Canada. These findings underscore the need for a clerkship directors committee and a national dialog about a core student curriculum to ensure consistency in the quality of student education in surgery.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical , General Surgery/education , Canada , Clinical Clerkship , Educational Measurement , Female , Humans , Internet , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
8.
Surg Endosc ; 21(6): 1002-5, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17440783

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Current developments in intraluminal and transluminal natural orifice surgery are limited by issues of access, tissue manipulation, and secure tissue approximation/closure. This report describes an initial laboratory experience with a novel tissue approximation and suturing device. The device is deployed via a previously described platform and is 6 mm in diameter. Desirable qualities of this tissue approximation/closure device include robust tissue grasping, minimal tissue trauma, fully visualized anchor placement via off-axis needle and anchor deployment, full reloadability without instrument withdrawal, single-operator operating capability, torque-stable manipulability, and operator-controlled tension setting of tissue anchor pairs. METHOD: The device was trialed in performing several maneuvers in porcine or canine models. The features of the system allowed bimanual tissue manipulation, full-thickness tissue approximation and plication, and secure closure of an ex vivo gastrotomy hole similar to that used during transluminal surgical interventions. CONCLUSIONS: This device appears to offer promise in achieving more complex endoluminal and potentially transluminal tasks, including secure suture closure of tissue defects and access holes. As such, devices of this type may prove useful in addressing some of the identified barriers to further development of natural orifice surgical intervention. Further investigation of the qualities and capabilities of this device in these settings is warranted.


Subject(s)
Gastroscopy , Stomach/surgery , Suture Techniques/instrumentation , Animals , Dogs , Gastroscopes , Models, Animal , Swine
18.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 387(1): 45-54, 2002 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11981684

ABSTRACT

In recent years, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration has become the procedure of choice in the management of choledocholithiasis in several laparoscopic centers. The increasing interest for this laparoscopic approach is due to the development of instrumentation and technique, allowing the procedure to be performed safely, and it is also the result of the revised role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, which has been questioned because of its cost, risk of complications and effectiveness. Many surgeons, however, are still not familiar with this technique. In this article we discuss the technique and results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Both the laparoscopic transcystic approach and choledochotomy are discussed, together with the results given in the literature. When one considers the costs, morbidity, mortality and the time required before the patient can return to work, it would appear that laparoscopic cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration is more favorable than open surgery or laparoscopic cholecystectomy with preoperative or postoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy. However, the technique requires advanced laparoscopic skills, including suturing, knot tying, the use of a choledochoscope, guidewire, dilators and balloon stone extractor. Although laparoscopic common bile duct exploration appears to be the most cost-effective method to treat common bile duct stones, it should be emphasized that this procedure is very challenging, and it should be performed by well-trained laparoscopic surgeons with experience in biliary surgery.


Subject(s)
Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures/methods , Common Bile Duct/surgery , Gallstones/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures/standards , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/standards
20.
Semin Laparosc Surg ; 9(1): 3-9, 2002 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11979405

ABSTRACT

The diagnosis of acute abdominal pain remains hinged on the performance of a careful history and physical exam. Five to ten million emergency department visits occur each year for acute abdominal pain, creating a need to achieve improved diagnostic accuracy in an expedient fashion. Technologies such as ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and diagnostic laparoscopy are helping achieve this goal. Of these, computed tomography appears to be the work horse of diagnostic imaging in the setting of acute abdominal pain. In this review, we examine each of these modalities, discussing their strengths and weaknesses. As well, we have reproduced an excellent algorithmic approach published by Martin and Rossi that shows the reader some basic diagnostic strategies for the evaluation of acute abdominal pain.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Laparoscopy , Acute Disease , Algorithms , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Physical Examination , Radiography, Abdominal , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ultrasonography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...