Outcomes and resource use of patients with large hemispheric infarction and cerebral edema: analysis of real-world data.

OBJECTIVE: Large hemispheric infarction (LHI) is associated with a high likelihood of the evolution of life-threatening edema. Few studies have assessed real-world clinical outcomes and management strategies among patients with LHI. The objective of this study was to describe the management, in-hospital outcomes, and direct healthcare resource burden of patients with LHI, as well as those of patients with subsequent cerebral edema. METHODS: This observational, retrospective cohort study analyzed de-identified data from US adult patients using the IBM MarketScan Hospital Drug Database (Q4-2015 to Q4-2017). Patients were included in the "Possible LHI" or the "Other Ischemic Strokes" cohorts using ICD-10 diagnosis codes. Patients with possible LHI were further categorized into "LHI with Edema" and "LHI without Edema" subgroups using diagnosis and procedure codes. Select clinical and economic outcomes were compared between cohorts and subgroups using multivariable regressions. RESULTS: Of 79,201 eligible encounters with ischemic strokes, 11,772 unique patients were assigned to the Possible LHI cohort while 67,429 were assigned to the Other Ischemic Strokes cohort. Among patients with possible LHI, 869 (7%) were assigned to the LHI with Edema subgroup and 10,903 (93%) were assigned to the LHI without Edema subgroup. Patients in the Possible LHI cohort had longer hospital stays (mean difference [MD] [95%CI] = 2.6 [2.4;2.8] days), higher total facility charges (MD [95%CI] = $28,656 [26,794;30,524]), and higher odds of death (odds ratio [95%CI] = 2.2 [2.0;2.4]) than the Other Ischemic Strokes cohort. Among patients with possible LHI, the incremental clinical and resource burden was further exacerbated in the subgroup of patients with edema (hospital days: MD [95%CI] = 5.0 [3.9;6.2] days; total facility charges: MD [95%CI] = $59,585 [50,816;67,583]; mortality: odds ratio [95%CI] = 10.3 [8.5;12.4]). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with ischemic strokes, LHI was associated with increased clinical management and direct healthcare resource burden in real-world hospital settings. The burden was substantially increased among patients who developed cerebral edema.

Retrospective analysis of comorbidities and treatment burden among patients with HIV infection in a US Medicaid population.

Objective: Comorbidities and comedications are important factors influencing optimal therapy because people are living longer with HIV infection. This study describes the long-term comorbidity profile and treatment burden among people with HIV-1 infection.Methods: This retrospective study included Medicaid claims data from patients with ≥1 antiretroviral (ARV) claim between 2016 and 2017 (most recent claim defined the index date), ≥1 HIV diagnosis within 1 year before index, age ≥18 years at first HIV diagnosis and <65 years at index, ≥12 months of continuous eligibility before index, and no history of HIV-2 infection. Comorbidities, concomitant medication use, and pill burden were assessed in the 4 years before index. Analyses were stratified by patient age and treatment experience.Results: Among 3456 patients, the mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 47.1 (10.4) years; the majority were black (55%) and men (63%). In general, the prevalence of comorbidities increased from the fourth year to the first year before index and included cardiovascular disease (28-40%), hypertension (24-37%), hyperlipidemia (12-17%), and asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (13-19%). Concomitant medication use corresponding to these comorbidities slightly increased over time. In the year before index, mean (SD) daily pill burden was 2.1 (1.4) for ARVs and 5.9 (5.9) for non-ARVs. Older age and prior treatment experience were associated with higher rates of comorbidities and greater pill burden.Conclusions: In people with HIV infection, comorbidities and concomitant medication use increased with age, supporting considerations for streamlined ARV regimens highlighted in treatment guidelines.

Time to treatment failure following initiation of fingolimod versus teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis: a retrospective US claims study.

Objective: Disease modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) aim to delay progression and reduce relapses. Evidence is limited on the comparative effectiveness of the oral DMTs fingolimod and teriflunomide. This study evaluated time to treatment failure among patients with MS who initiated fingolimod versus teriflunomide in real-world settings.Methods: The retrospective cohort included 18-64 year old patients diagnosed with MS who initiated fingolimod or teriflunomide during 12 September 2012 to 30 September 2015 within MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Claims. Patients were followed from treatment initiation (index date) until first treatment failure or censoring. Treatment failure was defined as the first occurrence of MS relapse (identified using a validated algorithm) or treatment discontinuation (≥60 day supply gap). Treatment failure was examined through Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression adjusting for 1 year baseline factors (age, gender, plan type, region, index year, prior DMT use, baseline relapses, Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] and MS symptoms).Results: On average, patients treated with fingolimod (n = 2704) were younger (43.6 versus 49.8 years) with lower CCI (0.4 versus 0.7) and more relapses at baseline (0.46 versus 0.42) than those treated with teriflunomide (n = 1859). Median time to treatment failure was 19.5 months with fingolimod versus 9.6 months with teriflunomide (p < .001). After controlling key demographic and clinical characteristics through multivariable regression, fingolimod was associated with 38.9% lower hazards of treatment failure versus teriflunomide (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.611; 95% CI: 0.559-0.669; p < .001).Conclusions: In a large cohort of US adults with MS, controlling for key baseline characteristics, fingolimod was associated with significantly longer time to treatment failure and lower risk of treatment failure compared with teriflunomide.

Hepatitis A, B, and A/B vaccination series completion among US adults: A claims-based analysis.

Hepatitis A and B disease burden persists in the US. We assessed hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccination series completion rates among 350,240 commercial/Medicare and 12,599 Medicaid enrollees aged ≥19 years. A vaccination series was considered as completed provided that the minimum interval between doses, as defined by the CDC, and the minimum number of doses were reached. We stratified completion rates by vaccine type (i.e. monovalent or bivalent) at initial vaccination for each cohort. In the commercial/Medicare cohort, the series completion rate was 32.0% for hepatitis A and 39.6% for hepatitis B among those who initiated with a monovalent vaccine, and it was 36.2% for hepatitis A and 48.9% for hepatitis B among those who initiated with a bivalent vaccine. In the Medicaid cohort, the series completion rate was 21.0% for hepatitis A and 24.0% for hepatitis B among those who initiated with a monovalent vaccine, and it was 19.0% for hepatitis A and 24.6% for hepatitis B among those who initiated with a bivalent vaccine. In conclusion, hepatitis A and B vaccination series completion rates were low, and appeared to be lower among Medicaid than among commercial/Medicare enrollees. Commercial/Medicare enrollees who initiated with a bivalent vaccine had higher series completion rates than those who initiated with monovalent vaccines - an observation that was not made among Medicaid enrollees.