Survey of transportation procedures, management practices, and health assessment related to quality, quantity, and value for market beef and dairy cows and bulls.

This survey consisted of data collected from 23 beef harvest plants to document transportation procedures, management practices, and health assessments of market beef and dairy cows and bulls (about n ≅ 7,000 animals). Gooseneck/bumper-pulled trailers were used more often to transport dairy cattle than beef cattle to market whereas tractor-trailers were used more often to transport beef cattle than dairy cattle. All loads (n = 103) met the American Meat Institute Foundation guidelines for spacing. Loads where more than 3% of the cattle slipped during unloading were observed in 27.3% of beef loads and 29.0% of the dairy loads. Beef loads had numerically greater usage of electrical prods (32.4%) versus dairy loads (15.4%) during unloading and were more likely to have a variety of driving aids used more aggressively on them. Fewer cattle had horns, brands, and mud/manure contamination on hides than in the previous survey in 1999. The predominant hide color for beef cows was black (44.2%) whereas the predominant color for dairy cows was the Holstein pattern (92.9%). Fewer cattle displayed evidence of bovine ocular neoplasia (2.9%) than in previous surveys in 1994 (8.5%) and 1999 (4.3%). Knots on live cattle were found less in the round (0.5%) and more in the shoulder region (4.6%) than in 1999 (1.4% and 0.4%, respectively). Dairy cows were more frequently lame in 2007 (48.7%) than 1999 (39.2%) whereas beef cows had numerically less lameness (16.3% vs. 26.6%, respectively). Most beef cows (62.3%) and dairy cows (68.9%) received midpoint body condition scores (3, 4, and 5 for beef; 2 and 3 for dairy). Beef cows had higher numerical percentages of no defects present (72.0%) versus dairy cows (63.0%) when evaluated for a variety of reproductive, health, or management conditions. Continued improvements in several key factors related to transportation, management, and health were observed in this survey, which could result in increased value in market beef and dairy cows and bulls.

Effects of supplemental feeding interval on adult cows in western Texas.

Two experiments involving Brangus and Hereford x Brangus cows (3 to 10 yr) were conducted at four locations in western Texas to determine the effects of supplemental feeding interval on serum urea nitrogen (SUN) patterns, intake of supplement and forage, and winter changes in live body weight and condition score. Treatments were control (Control; no supplemental feed) and the equivalent of .91 kg/d of cottonseed meal (CSM) fed daily (Daily), three times per week (3T/WK), or one time per week (WK). At each location, one pasture group was given all four treatments (four cows/treatment) using Calan gates. In Exp. 1, conducted in 1994-95, blood samples were obtained for determining SUN during the last week of the study. Experiment 2, conducted in 1995-96, included both an individually fed herd and four additional herds at each location that were group-fed the four treatments. Experiment 2 included estimates of intakes of both CSM and forage in both individually fed and group-fed herds. A bolus containing chromium (Cr-bolus) was used to estimate fecal output in the individually fed cows. A double marker technique was used to determine total (Cr-bolus) and CSM (Yb) intakes in the group-fed cows. Data included initial and final cow weights and condition scores (Exp. 1 and 2), SUN patterns (Exp. 1), and supplement, forage, and total intakes (Exp. 2). Feeding CSM to range cows increased SUN concentrations (Exp. 1), reduced losses in live body weight and body condition score (Exp. 1 and 2), and tended to decrease forage intake by the approximate amount of the supplement (Exp. 2). Generally, providing supplement as infrequently as once per week reduced losses in live body weight and body condition score compared with control and was as effective as once daily supplementation. For the group-fed cows, supplement intake, forage intake, and live body weight change were more variable within groups with once daily feeding than when supplement was fed less frequently. These data indicate that feeding as infrequently as one time per week can be effective nutrition management for adult cows grazing native range.

Value of a molasses mixture containing natural protein as a supplement to brood cows offered low-quality forages.

In a 4-yr study, molasses (M; 6% CP), molasses-urea (MU; 17.5% CP; 92% molasses, 4% urea and 4% water) and molasses-cottonseed meal-urea (MCSM; 17.5% CP; 73% molasses, 25% cottonseed meal, 1% urea and 1% water) were compared as winter supplements for Braford cows (514 matings) consuming low-quality forage. Cows were fed 1.35, 1.50 and 1.27 kg.head-1.d-1 of the respective supplements for 127 d beginning in December. Cows were wintered on bahiagrass pasture (avg 8% CP) and stargrass hay (avg 5% CP). Quantity of hay offered averaged 7.6 kg.cow-1.d-1 over 109 d. Cows were exposed to bulls for 90 d beginning on March 1. Supplementation treatment did not affect cow live weight, live weight change or condition score (P greater than .05). However, pregnancy rate was higher (P less than .05) for cows fed MCSM (79.0%) than for cows fed M (67.8%). The pregnancy rate of cows fed MU (76.3%) was intermediate to, but not different (P greater than .05) from, that of cows fed either M or MCSM. Supplementation treatment did not affect calf performance as measured by birth weight, survival rate or weaning weight (P greater than .05). However, calves from cows fed MCSM were 6 d older (P less than .05) at weaning than calves from cows fed M. For 3-yr-old cows, pregnancy rate was considerably higher (P less than .05) for cows fed MCSM (69.6%) than for cows fed M (37.5%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)