Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36497628

ABSTRACT

This work compares relative mask inhalation protection against a range of airborne particle sizes that the general public may encounter, including infectious particles, wildfire smoke and ash, and allergenic fungal and plant particles. Several mask types available to the public were modeled with respirable fraction deposition. Best-case collection efficiencies for cloth, surgical, and respirator masks were predicted to be lowest (0.3, 0.6, and 0.8, respectively) for particle types with dominant sub-micrometer modes (wildfire smoke and human-emitted bronchial particles). Conversely, all mask types were predicted to achieve good collection efficiency (up to ~1.0) for the largest-sized particle types, including pollen grains, some fungal spores, and wildfire ash. Polydisperse infectious particles were predicted to be captured by masks with efficiencies of 0.3-1.0 depending on the pathogen size distribution and the type of mask used. Viruses aerosolized orally are predicted to be captured efficiently by all mask types, while those aerosolized from bronchiolar or laryngeal-tracheal sites are captured with much lower efficiency by surgical and cloth masks. The predicted efficiencies changed very little when extrathoracic deposition was included (inhalable rather than respirable fraction) or when very large (100 µm) particles were neglected. Actual mask fit and usage will determine protection levels in practice, but the relative comparisons in this work can inform mask guidance for different inhalation hazards, including particles generated by yard work, wildfires, and infections.


Subject(s)
Respiratory Protective Devices , Humans , Masks , Smoke , Allergens , Particle Size , Aerosols
2.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 18(10-11): 495-509, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34515602

ABSTRACT

Minimization of airborne virus transmission has become increasingly important due to pandemic and endemic infectious respiratory diseases. Physical distancing is a frequently advocated control measure, but the proximity-based transmission it is intended to control is challenging to incorporate into generalized, ventilation-based models. We utilize a size-dependent aerosol release model with turbulent dispersion to assess the impact of direct, near-field transport in conjunction with changes in ventilation, exposure duration, exhalation/inhalation rates, and masks. We demonstrate this model on indoor and outdoor scenarios to estimate the relative impacts on infection risk. The model can be expressed as a product of six multiplicative factors that may be used to identify opportunities for risk reduction. The additive nature of the short-range (proximity) and long-range (background) transmission components of the aerosol transport factor implies that they must be minimized simultaneously. Indoor simulations showed that close physical distances attenuated the impact of most other risk reduction factors. Increasing ventilation resulted in a 17-fold risk decrease at further physical distances but only a 6-fold decrease at shorter distances. Distance, emission rate, and duration also had large impacts on risk (11-65-fold), while air direction and inhalation rate had lower risk impacts (3-4-fold range). Surgical mask and respirator models predicted higher maximum risk impacts (33- and 280-fold, respectively) than cloth masks (4-fold). Most simulations showed decreasing risk at distances > 1-2 m (3-6 ft). The risk benefit of maintaining 2-m distance vs. 1 m depended substantially on the environmental turbulence and ventilation rate. Outdoors, long-range transmission was negligible and short-range transmission was the primary determinant of risk. Temporary passing events increased risk by up to 50 times at very slow walking speeds and close passing distances, but the relative risks outdoors were still much lower than indoors. The current model assumes turbulent dispersion typical of a given room size and ventilation rate. However, calm environments or confined airflows may increase transmission risks beyond levels predicted with this turbulent model.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Physical Distancing , Aerosols , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Environ Sci Technol ; 46(11): 6088-95, 2012 Jun 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22533607

ABSTRACT

We present an application of Raman microspectroscopy (RMS) for the rapid characterization and identification of individual spores from several species of microfungi. The RMS-based methodology requires minimal sample preparation and small sample volumes for analyses. Hence, it is suitable for preserving sample integrity while providing micrometer-scale spatial resolution required for the characterization of individual cells. We present the acquisition of unique Raman spectral signatures from intact fungal spores dispersed on commercially available aluminum foil substrate. The RMS-based method has been used to compile a reference library of Raman spectra from several species of microfungi typically associated with damp indoor environments. The acquired reference spectral library has subsequently been used to identify individual microfungal spores through direct comparison of the spore Raman spectra with the reference spectral signatures in the library. Moreover, the distinct peak structures of Raman spectra provide detailed insight into the overall chemical composition of spores. We anticipate potential application of this methodology in the fields of public health, forensic sciences, and environmental microbiology.


Subject(s)
Air Microbiology , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Humidity , Spectrum Analysis, Raman/methods , Spores, Fungal/cytology , Structure Collapse , Basidiomycota/cytology , Reference Standards , Soot/analysis
4.
AIHA J (Fairfax, Va) ; 64(5): 630-9, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14521436

ABSTRACT

The objective of this work was to investigate the ability of the Wagner-Leith passive aerosol sampler to measure indoor exposures over periods of 24 hours to 2 weeks. An automated analysis technique was developed so that lower aerosol concentrations could be sampled over shorter time periods. A test of the new analytical method against a manual method showed good agreement. The passive sampler was tested alongside three pump-operated, size-selective samplers in indoor environments. Generally, good correlation with the active samplers was observed. Correlation with a personal impactor with uncoated substrates was not statistically significant, but the cyclone, MS&T impactor, and overall correlations had R(2) values of 0.73-0.88. Combining these data with a previous study produced an R(2) of 0.96 between passive and active results. Large discrepancies (up to 147%) between passive and personal impactor results were observed and were attributed to particle bounce in the impactor, passive sampler imprecision due to few collected fine particles, and problems with detection of organic particles in the passive sampler. The Wagner-Leith sampler has now been tested over five orders of magnitude in mass concentration, in which it has proved useful for obtaining aerosol size distributions, mass fractions, qualitative elemental analysis, and morphology of individual particles. The sampler has several limitations, including increased sensitivity to contamination when fewer particles are collected, uncertainties in sampling semi-volatile particles, and the need for some expertise and expense to analyze the passive samples.


Subject(s)
Aerosols/analysis , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Environmental Monitoring/instrumentation , Occupational Exposure , Equipment Design , Humans , Particle Size , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...