Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 34(3): e13929, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36974641

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chronic urticaria (CU) is defined as the occurrence of wheals/angioedema for ≥6 consecutive weeks. Until now, guidelines and publications addressing CU have focused mainly on adults. As a result, evidence and guidance in the pediatric population are scarce. METHODS: This study aims to describe clinical and laboratory findings in pediatric CU and to determine factors associated with remission. RESULTS: 185 patients, 54% female, median age at onset of 8.8 years. Angioedema was present in almost half. The most common type of CU was chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) in 74%. At least one atopic comorbidity was found in almost a third (35%). In addition, 8% had an autoimmune disorder (exclusively in CSU) and 9% had a psychiatric condition. Basopenia was found in 67% and was more frequently associated with CSU. The basophil activation test (BAT) was positive in 40%. With regard to remission, being of male sex, angioedema absence, the absence of physical triggers, and eosinophil counts >0.51 × 109 /L were associated with shorter CU duration. CONCLUSION: Atopy is a common condition in pediatric CU. CSU is the most common type. Autoimmune comorbidities and basopenia were significantly more common in CSU. In addition, ours is one of the few studies, assessing BAT utility in the pediatric population, being positive in a relevant percentage (40%). BAT positivity was more frequent in CSU. Our results suggest that the absence of angioedema and physical triggers, male sex, and eosinophil counts >0.51 × 109 /L appear to be associated with a better prognosis in terms of remission.


Subject(s)
Angioedema , Chronic Urticaria , Urticaria , Adult , Humans , Child , Male , Female , Chronic Disease , Chronic Urticaria/epidemiology , Urticaria/diagnosis , Urticaria/epidemiology , Angioedema/diagnosis , Angioedema/epidemiology
7.
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am ; 40(1): 111-133, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31761113

ABSTRACT

Oral immunotherapy (OIT) for food allergy entails a risk of adverse reactions, including anaphylaxis. This safety concern is the major barrier for OIT to become a therapeutic option in clinical practice. The high heterogeneity in safety reporting of OIT studies prevents setting the safety profile accurately. An international consensus is needed to facilitate the analysis of large pooled clinical data with homogeneous safety reporting, that together with integrated omics, and patients/families' opinions, may help stratify the patients' risk and needs, and help developing safe(r) individualized care pathways. This will give OIT the right place in the food allergy therapy.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis/prevention & control , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Food Hypersensitivity/therapy , Allergens/immunology , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Animals , Desensitization, Immunologic/adverse effects , Food , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Humans , Risk
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...