Comparison of the lower limit of benchmark dose confidence interval with no-observed-adverse-effect level by applying four different software for tumorigenicity testing of pesticides in Japan.

The benchmark dose (BMD) approach is updated to create an international harmonizing process following rapid theoretical sophistication. We calculated the lower limit of BMD confidence interval (BMDL) for carcinogenicity based on 193 tumorigenicity bioassay data published in 50 pesticide risk assessment reports by the Food Safety Commission of Japan (FSCJ) to validate the appropriateness and necessity for the refinement of the FSCJ-established BMD guidance. Three well-known BMD software, PROAST, BMDS, and BBMD were used to compare their BMDLs with no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) for carcinogenicity. Recently implemented methodologies such as model averaging or Bayesian inference were also used. Our results indicate that the BMD approach provides a point of departure similar to the NOAEL approach if the data used exhibit a clear dose-response relationship. In some cases, particularly in software with a frequentist approach, the calculation failed to provide BMDL or provided considerably lower BMDLs than NOAELs. However, most of the datasets that resulted in failed calculations or extremely low BMDLs exhibited unclear dose-response relationships, i.e., non-monotonous and sporadic responses. The expert review on the shape of the dose-response plot would help better apply the BMD approach. Furthermore, we observed that Bayesian approaches provided fewer failed or extreme BMD calculations than the frequentist approaches.

[Important Points at Interpretation ofNongenotoxic-Carcinogenicity Induced by Pesticidesin Rodent Bioassays].

Assessment of carcinogenicity is important for human health at dietary risk assessment of pesticide residues. This article indicated important points on interpretation of carcinogenicity in toxicological evaluation of pesticide residues based on principles of risk analysis in foods by CODEX to be a guide for risk assessors. This guidance was referred from the guidance on carcinogenicity evaluation by international and/or national organizations, and the interpretations of Food Safety Commissions of Japan (FSCJ) published in their risk assessment reports. We focused on carcinogenicity obtained from routine carcinogenicity bioassays in rodents. The guidance includes the purpose and usefulness of the bioassay studies, consideration points to be carcinogenicity and influencing factors to carcinogenicity in the test to judge carcinogenic hazard at hazard identification. Considering on human relevance as carcinogenic hazard also was proposed using practical case examples. Next, a carcinogenic hazard is evaluated on dose-response relationship to judge points of departure on carcinogenicity. At the end of this article, we challenged our recommendation on future assessment of carcinogenicity to progress from hazard to risk.

Case analysis of kinetics investigations in toxicity studies of pesticides to identify the nonlinearity of internal exposure and the influences of nonlinearity on the toxicological interpretation of pesticide residue.

The nonlinearity of internal exposure to 8 pesticides was investigated in toxicity studies using kinetics to identify nonlinearity visually and to investigate the influence of nonlinearity on toxicological evaluation. Data were obtained from risk assessment reports published by the Food Safety Commission (FSCJ). Nonlinearity was defined using 2 indicators: the lowest visual inflection point (LVIP) and the second lowest visual inflection point (SVIP) of kinetics by drawing a linear distribution chart. The area under the curve and 24-h urine concentrations were stable parameters used to identify the LVIP/SVIP. The sampling timing affected the blood concentrations, and the LVIP/SVIP was detected for 6 pesticides using the parent compounds or their metabolites as analytes. The subproportional nonlinearity was significant for these pesticides. The LVIP/SVIP values were consistent in the same species up to a 1-year period, but the values showed species-specific differences in several compounds. In all compounds found to be nonlinear, apical outcomes were observed at the SVIP or above. The presence of nonlinearity was recognized by the FSCJ. The recognition influenced their judgment of no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) for carcinogenicity or health-based guidance values, indicating the importance of appropriate kinetics to identify the nonlinearity for toxicological evaluation of pesticide residue.