Hypertonic saline in elevated intracranial pressure: past, present, and future.

Hypertonic Saline (HS) has been a proven and effective therapy and a safe alternative to mannitol in patients with increase intracranial pressure (ICP). We hereby present a case of 25-year-old women with intracranial bleed secondary to right parietal arteriovenous malformation. Patient underwent surgery for evacuation of hematoma and resection of arteriovenous malformation. Post- operative course was complicated by recurrent episodes of elevated ICP. She received total of 17 doses of 23.4% HS and 30 doses of mannitol with good outcome. Despite reluctance from some clinicians to use HS, hypertonic saline seems to be a safe and effective therapy.

Utility of a combined current procedural terminology and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code algorithm in classifying cervical spine surgery for degenerative changes.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a combined Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) algorithm in defining cervical spine surgery in comparison to patient operative reports in the medical record. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Epidemiological studies of spine surgery often use ICD-9-CM billing codes in administrative databases to study trends and outcome of surgery. However, ICD-9-CM codes do not clearly identify specific surgical factors that may be related to outcome, such as instrumentation or number of levels treated. Previous studies have not investigated the sensitivity and specificity of a combined CPT and ICD-9-CM code algorithm for defining cervical spine surgical procedures. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study comparing the sensitivity and specificity of a combined CPT and ICD-9-CM code algorithm to the operative note, the gold standard, in a single academic center. We also compared the accuracy of our combined algorithm with our published ICD-9-CM-only algorithm. RESULTS: The combined algorithm has high sensitivity and specificity for defining cervical spine surgery, specific surgical procedures such as discectomy and fusion, and surgical approach. Compared to the ICD-9-CM-only algorithm, the combined algorithm significantly improves identification of discectomy, laminectomy, and fusion procedures and allows identification of specific procedures such as laminaplasty and instrumentation with high sensitivity and specificity. Identification of reoperations has low sensitivity and specificity, but identification of number of levels instrumented, fused, and decompressed has high specificity. CONCLUSION: The use of our combined CPT and ICD-9-CM algorithm to identify cervical spine surgery was highly sensitive and specific. For categories such as surgical approach, accuracy of our combined algorithm was similar to that of our ICD-9-CM-only algorithm. However, the combined algorithm improves sensitivity, and allows identification of procedures not defined by ICD-9-CM procedure codes, and number of levels instrumented and decompressed. The combined algorithm better defines cervical spine surgery and specific factors that may impact outcome and cost.

Strengths and limitations of International Classification of Disease Ninth Revision Clinical Modification codes in defining cervical spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of International Classification of Disease Ninth Revision Clinical Modification (ICD9-CM) hospital discharge codes to define degenerative cervical spine surgery in comparison to patient operative notes in the medical record. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Population-based studies of spine surgery have often relied on administrative databases as a primary information source, but little is known about the validity of using ICD9-CM codes to identify these operations. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study comparing ICD9-CM billing codes to patient operative notes, the gold standard, for patients undergoing spine surgery in 2006 at a single academic center. RESULTS: We identified 1090 procedures of which 265 were categorized as cervical spine surgery for degenerative indications based on the operative notes. Compared to operative notes, our ICD9-CM algorithm had high sensitivity and specificity for selecting surgery at the cervical spine level and cervical spine surgery for degenerative indications. Categorization of cases by procedure had high sensitivity and specificity for fusion and surgical approach (>95%). Categorization of cases by primary diagnosis was generally less accurate. Cervical spondylosis with myelopathy was the most sensitive primary diagnosis. Categorization of cases by procedure had high sensitivity and specificity for fusion and surgical approach (≥96%). However, diagnoses such as herniated disc and procedures such as laminectomy had low sensitivity but high specificity. CONCLUSION: The use of our ICD9-CM algorithm to define spine surgery at the cervical spine level, and degenerative cervical spine surgery is highly accurate. Although specific diagnoses codes are mostly insensitive, an ICD9-CM algorithm can be used to study these procedures with reasonable precision.

Pain with no gain: allodynia following neural stem cell transplantation in spinal cord injury.

Transplantation of neural stem cells (NSCs) in the injured spinal cord has been shown to improve functional outcome; however, recent evidence has demonstrated forelimb allodynia following transplantation of embryonic NSCs. The aim of this study was to investigate whether transplantation of murine C17.2 NSCs alone or transfected with glial-derived neurotrophic factor (C17.2/GDNF) would induce allodynia in transplanted spinal cord-injured animals. One week after a T8-level spinal cord injury (SCI), C17.2, C17.2/GDNF or normal saline was injected at the injury site. Locomotor function and sensory recovery to thermal and mechanical stimuli were then measured. Spinal cords were processed immunohistochemically at the injury/transplantation site for characterization of NSC survival and differentiation; and at the cervicothoracic level for calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a neuropeptide expressed in dorsal horn nocioceptive neurons, and growth-associated protein-43 (GAP43), a marker of neuronal sprouting. Locomotor function was not significantly improved following NSC transplantation at any time (P >0.05). Significant forelimb thermal and mechanical allodynia were observed following transplantation with both NSC populations (P <0.05). The C17.2 and C17.2/GDNF NSCs survived and differentiated into a predominately astrocytic population. Calcitonin gene-related peptide and GAP43 immunoreactivity significantly increased and co-localized in cervicothoracic dorsal horn laminae I-III following C17.2 and C17.2/GDNF transplantation. This study demonstrated that murine C17.2 NSCs differentiated primarily into astrocytes when transplanted into the injured spinal cord, and resulted in thermal and mechanical forelimb allodynia. Sprouting of nocioceptive afferents occurred rostral to the injury/transplantation site only in allodynic animals, suggesting a principal role in this aberrant pain state. Further, a difference in the degree of allodynia was noted between C17.2- and C17.2/GDNF transplant-treated groups; this difference correlated with the level of CGRP/GAP43 immunoreactivity and sprouting observed in the cervicothoracic dorsal horns. Both allodynia- and CGRP/GAP43-positive afferent sprouting were less in the C17.2/GDNF group compared to the C17.2 group, suggesting a possible protective or analgesic effect of GDNF on post-injury neuropathic pain.

Exposure to pulsed magnetic fields enhances motor recovery in cats after spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Animal model study of eight healthy commercial cats was conducted. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pulsed electromagnetic field (PMF) stimulation results in improvement of function after contusive spinal cord injury in cats. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PMF stimulation has been shown to enhance nerve growth, regeneration, and functional recovery of peripheral nerves. Little research has been performed examining the effects of PMF stimulation on the central nervous system and no studies of PMF effects on in vivo spinal cord injury (SCI) models have been reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PMF stimulation was noninvasively applied for up to 12 weeks to the midthoracic spine of cats with acute contusive spinal cord injury. The injury was produced using a weight-drop apparatus. Motor functions were evaluated with the modified Tarlov assessment scale. Morphologic analyses of the injury sites and somatosensory-evoked potential measurements were conducted to compare results between PMF-stimulated and control groups. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in locomotor recovery between the PMF-stimulated and control groups. Although not statistically significant, PMF-stimulated spinal cords demonstrated greater sparing of peripheral white matter and smaller lesion volumes compared to controls. Somatosensory-evoked potential measurements indicated that the PMF-stimulated group had better recovery of preinjury waveforms than the control group; however, this observation also was not statistically significant because of the small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study indicates that pulsed magnetic fields may have beneficial effects on motor function recovery and lesion volume size after acute spinal cord injury.