Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMJ Open ; 9(9): e027059, 2019 09 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31488467

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To understand patterns of subcutaneous (SC) biologics use over time in adults with inflammatory rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases receiving a homecare delivery service. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Patients in secondary care receiving SC biologics in the largest Scottish Health Board. PARTICIPANTS: A new bespoke cohort was created from routine data gathered as part of a health board Homecare Service Database. Patients over 18 years who received a supply of SC biologic from January 2012 to May 2015 with a diagnosis for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) were included. OUTCOMES MEASURED: A standardised framework was applied by measuring discontinuation rates, persistence using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression and adherence using medication refill adherence (MRA) and compliance rate (CR). RESULTS: 751 patients were identified (AS: 105, PsA: 227, RA: 419) of whom 89.3% had more than one biologic delivery (median days' follow-up: AS: 494; PsA: 544; RA: 529) and 83.2% did not switch biologic. For all conditions, approximately half were persistent on their index biologic (52% AS, 54% PsA, 48%RA). Of patients who discontinued treatment, the majority reinitiated with the same biologic (19% AS, 18% PsA and 21% RA). Overall adherence during the period of treatment was over 80% when calculated using MRA (median %MRA: AS: 84.0%, PsA: 85.0%, RA: 82.4%) or CR (median %CR: AS: 96.6%, PsA: 97%, RA: 96.6%). CONCLUSION: Use of linked routine data is a sustainable pathway to enable ongoing evaluation of biologics use. A more consistent approach to studying use (discontinuation, persistence and adherence metrics) should be adopted to enable comparability of studies.


Subject(s)
Biological Products/therapeutic use , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Rheumatic Diseases , Adult , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance , Drug Substitution/statistics & numerical data , Drug Utilization Review/methods , Drug Utilization Review/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Injections, Subcutaneous , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Diseases/drug therapy , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Rheumatic Diseases/drug therapy , Rheumatic Diseases/epidemiology , Scotland/epidemiology
2.
Future Sci OA ; 5(2): FSO369, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30820348

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the persistence of biological (TNF inhibitor [anti-TNF]) and synthetic (conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs [csDMARDs]) antirheumatic agents for psoriatic arthritis and their associated factors. METHODS: A historical cohort was developed. Persistence and associated factors were evaluated at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients were included. The anti-TNF treatment presented higher persistence as compared with csDMARDs at 6 (83.4 vs 50.8%; p < 0.05) and 12 months (66.4 vs 35.6%; p < 0.05). From anti-TNFs, adalimumab and etanercept presented similar persistence, along with leflunomide and methotrexate among the csDMARDs. The factors associated with non-persistence with regard to anti-TNF agents were female sex and use of infliximab. CONCLUSION: Anti-TNF agents are important therapeutic alternatives and present lower rates of discontinuation as compared with csDMARDs.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...