Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Anaesth ; 75(1): 15-8, 1995 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7669460

ABSTRACT

In order to investigate the analgesic effect of timing of administration of ketorolac 10 mg i.v., we recorded patient-controlled use of diamorphine at 2, 4 and 12 h after abdominal hysterectomy. In a randomized, double-blind trial, 30 patients received ketorolac before skin incision and 28 after skin closure. A control group of 32 patients did not receive ketorolac. We measured operative blood loss and assessed nausea, vomiting and pruritus. After 2 h of patient-controlled analgesia, the median cumulative diamorphine dose in the group given ketorolac before operation was less than that of the control group (95% confidence interval 8-66 micrograms kg-1; P = 0.01). There were no other statistically significant differences in diamorphine consumption between the groups. The frequency of nausea and vomiting was similar in all groups Median blood loss in the group given ketorolac before operation exceeded that of the patients who did not receive ketorolac before operation (95% confidence interval 20-149 ml; P = 0.01). We conclude that the diamorphine-sparing effect of ketorolac attributable to timing of administration was small, conferred no clinical benefit and was accompanied by increased bleeding. No patient given ketorolac complained of pruritus.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Heroin/administration & dosage , Hysterectomy , Tolmetin/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Aged , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/adverse effects , Blood Loss, Surgical , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Ketorolac , Middle Aged , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Preanesthetic Medication , Tolmetin/administration & dosage , Tolmetin/adverse effects
2.
Anaesthesia ; 39(1): 61-3, 1984 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6696222

ABSTRACT

A prospective randomised double blind study was carried out to compare the use of epidural methadone, morphine and bupivacaine for pain relief after Caesarean section. The results indicate that methadone is the most effective agent with few side effects. Subsequently this method was used routinely for postoperative analgesia in all patients undergoing Caesarean section. A retrospective study of 178 patients having this method of analgesia was carried out and indicated that epidural methadone is an effective and safe method of postoperative pain relief.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Methadone/therapeutic use , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Anesthesia, Epidural , Anesthesia, Obstetrical , Bupivacaine , Double-Blind Method , Epidural Space , Female , Humans , Injections , Methadone/administration & dosage , Morphine/administration & dosage , Morphine/therapeutic use , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...