Implementation and evaluation of a national quality improvement initiative in cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: In 2017, the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, a Canadian federally sponsored organisation, initiated a national multijurisdictional quality improvement (QI) initiative to maximise the use of synoptic data to drive cancer system improvements, known as the Evidence for Surgical Synoptic Quality Improvement Programme. The goal of our study was to evaluate the outcomes, determinants and learning of this nationally led initiative across six jurisdictions in Canada, integrating a mix of cancer surgery disease sites and clinicians. METHODS: A mixed-methods evaluation (surveys, semistructured interviews and focus groups) of this initiative was focused on the ability of each jurisdiction to use synoptic reporting data to successfully implement and sustain QI projects to beyond the completion of the initiative and the lessons learnt in the process. Resources provided to the jurisdictions included operational funding, training in QI methodology, national forums, expert coaches, and ad hoc monitoring and support. The programme emphasised foundational concepts of the QI process including data literacy, audit and feedback reports, communities of practice (CoP) and positive deviance methodology. RESULTS: 101 CoP meetings were held and 337 clinicians received feedback reports. There were 23 projects, and 22 of 23 (95%) showed improvements with 15 of 23 (65%) achieving the proposed targets. Enablers of effective data utilisation/feedback reports for QI included the need for clinicians to trust the data, have comparative data for feedback, and the engagement of both data scientists and clinicians in designing feedback reports. Enablers of sustainability of QI within each jurisdiction included QI training for clinicians, the ability to continue CoP meetings, executive and broad stakeholder engagement, and the ability to use pre-existing organisational infrastructures and processes. Barriers to continue QI work included lack of funding for core team members, lack of automated data collection processes and lack of clinician incentives (financial and other). CONCLUSION: Success and sustainability in data-driven QI in cancer surgery require skills in QI methodology, data literacy and feedback, dedicated supportive personnel and an environment that promotes the process of collective learning and shared accountability. Building these capabilities in jurisdictional teams, tailoring interventions to facility contexts and strong leadership engagement will create the capacity for continued success in QI for cancer surgery.

Quality of Life Following the Surgical Management of Gastric Cancer Using Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Introduction: Surgical management of gastric adenocarcinoma can have a drastic impact on a patient's quality of life (QoL). There is high variability among surgeons' preferences for the type of resection and reconstructive method. Peri-operative and cancer-specific outcomes remain equivalent between the different approaches. Therefore, postoperative quality of life can be viewed as a deciding factor for the surgical approach. The goal of this study was to interrogate patient QoL using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Methods: This systematic review was registered at Prospero and followed PRISMA guidelines. Medline, Embase, and Scopus were used to perform a literature search on 18 January 2020. A set of selection criteria and the data extraction sheet were predefined. Covidence (Melbourne, Australia) software was used; two reviewers (P.C.V. and E.J.) independently reviewed the articles, and a third resolved conflicts (A.B.F.). Results: The search yielded 1446 studies; 308 articles underwent full-text review. Ultimately, 28 studies were included for qualitative analysis, including 4630 patients. Significant heterogeneity existed between the studies. Geography was predominately East Asian (22/28 articles). While all aspects of quality of life were found to be affected by a gastrectomy, most functional or symptom-specific measures reached baseline by 6-12 months. The most significant ongoing symptoms were reflux, diarrhoea, and nausea/vomiting. Discussion: Generally, patients who undergo a gastrectomy return to baseline QoL by one year, regardless of the type of surgery or reconstruction. A subtotal distal gastrectomy is preferred when proper oncologic margins can be obtained. Additionally, no one form of reconstruction following gastrectomy is statistically preferred over another. However, for subtotal distal gastrectomy, there was a trend toward Roux-en-Y reconstruction as superior to abating reflux.

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal mesothelioma: Canadian practices and outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal mesothelioma (PM) is a rare malignancy originating from the peritoneal lining. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the standard-of-care for patients with isolated PM. Due to a paucity of prospective data there are several different HIPEC protocols. The aims of this study are to describe the CRS and HIPEC protocols for PM and patient outcomes across Canada. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study was performed on patients diagnosed and treated for PM with CRS and HIPEC in four major peritoneal disease centers in Canada between 2000 and 2021. Data on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, postoperative morbidity, recurrence, and survival were collected. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were identified. Mean age was 52 years (17-75) and 37.5% were male. Epithelioid (70.1%) and multicystic (13%) mesothelioma were the most common subtypes. Twenty-one patients (30%) were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CRS and HIPEC was performed in 64 patients (91.4%). Of these, the mean PCI was 22 (2-39) and cisplatin+doxorubicin was the most common HIPEC regimen (n = 33, 51.6%). A semi-closed coliseum technique was used in 68.8% of HIPECs and the mean duration of surgery was 486 min (90-1052). Clavien-Dindo III or IV complications occurred in 12 patients (16.9%). With a median follow-up of 24 months (0.2-104.4), we found a 5-year overall survival of 61% and a 5-year recurrence-free survival of 35%. CONCLUSION: CRS and HIPEC is a safe and effective treatment modality for well-selected patients with PM, with some achieving prolonged survival.

MDM2 analysis in the management of benign lipomas versus atypical lipomatous tumors/well-differentiated liposarcomas: A useful prognostication tool?

INTRODUCTION: Well-differentiated liposarcomas (WDLS) are low-grade lipomatous tumors with low malignant potential. Previous review identified controversy on whether upfront wide resection is necessary when they occur on the trunk or the extremities. MDM2 amplification is a genetic mutation typically present in WDLS and absent in benign lipomas (BL). We aimed to study the influence of MDM2 status on the management/recurrences of lipomatous tumors in the trunk or the extremities. METHODS: All patients with lipomatous tumors with MDM2 testing in the Province of Alberta between 2015 and 2020 were identified from the Cancer Cytogenetics Laboratory dataset. High grade sarcomas, retroperitoneal, head/neck, or groin tumors were excluded. Primary outcome measures including MDM2 status, surgical margin, local recurrence, reoperation rate, dedifferentiation, and metastasis were abstracted from chart review. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse treatment patterns and recurrence rates according to MDM2 status. RESULTS: Total of 764 charts were retrieved, and 282 were included for analysis. 33 showed MDM2 amplification (11.7%), and 2 of them had local recurrence (6.1%). Two patients with recurrent tumors underwent limb-salvaging reoperation (6.1%), but no dedifferentiation or metastasis was seen. CONCLUSION: Findings in this study confirmed the benign behaviour of truncal/extremities lipomas with no MDM2 amplification. Given we found a 6.1% recurrence rate in MDM2 amplified tumors, a prolong follow up of this subset of patients is warranted. Overall, regardless of the MDM2 status, we believe an initial marginal excision is a reasonable surgical approach as recurrences are rare, and they can be managed with re-excision when they occur.

Yield of routine staging laparoscopy in patients with gastric cancer in Alberta, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Despite guidelines recommending diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with gastric cancer, implementation is low. We aimed to explore trends in the use of laparoscopy for staging of gastric cancer in Alberta, Canada, determine the rate of positive findings and identify factors predictive of positive staging laparoscopy (SL) findings in this patient population. METHODS: In August 2018, we sent a survey to all general surgeons in Alberta who were members of the Alberta Association of General Surgeons to identify those treating gastric cancer. The survey inquired about type of practice (academic or community), gastric cancer case volume, routine versus selective use of SL and, if selective use of SL, criteria used to select cases. Participants were also asked to provide data from their SL cases from July 2007 to February 2019. We double-checked surgeon records with chart review. The primary outcome was evidence of metastatic disease on SL or cytologic examination or both. We performed logistic regression analysis to identify factors predictive of positive laparoscopy findings. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 41 of 127 surgeons (response rate 32.3%). We reviewed 116 cases from 5 surgeons at 4 centres. Gross metastatic disease or positive findings on cytologic examination or both were identified in 37 patients (31.9%). On univariate analysis, the following were associated with an increased risk of identification of metastatic disease at laparoscopy: visualization of the primary tumour on computed tomography (CT) (odds ratio [OR] 9.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-76.5), presence of abdominal lymphadenopathy greater than 1 cm (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.4) and presence of ascites (OR 19.1, 95% CI 2.2-161.8). Visualization of the primary tumour on CT (OR 8.4, 95% CI 1.0-68.3) and the presence of ascites (OR 15.9, 95% CI 1.8-137.0) remained statistically significant predictors on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Metastatic disease was identified at SL in almost one-third of cases, which suggests that SL should still be used routinely in gastric cancer staging in Canadian centres. Our study identified several preoperative imaging findings associated with evidence of metastatic disease on laparoscopy; however, further studies are needed to establish robust predictors of positive findings before advocating for a selective SL approach.

Gastric cancer management in elderly patients: a population-based study of treatment patterns and outcomes in gastric cancer patients ≥ 75 years from Alberta, Canada.

BACKGROUND: As Canada's population ages, incidence of gastric cancer in elderly patients is increasing. There is little data on treatment and outcomes of gastric cancer in patients older than age 75. This study aimed to assess treatment patterns and outcomes of non-metastatic elderly gastric cancer patients in Alberta, Canada. METHODS: Records of elderly patients (age 75 or older) diagnosed with localized gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer between 2007 and 2012 who received curative intent surgery were retrospectively collected from the Alberta Cancer Registry. A chart review was completed to gather demographics; treatment details of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy; and outcomes. Descriptive analyses were undertaken, and variables were compared with parametric and nonparametric tests where appropriate. RESULTS: 130 predominantly male (69%) patients, median age 80 (range 75-96) were included. 17 patients (13%) received multimodality therapy. 115 (88.5%) had negative margins on final pathology. Mean lymph nodes retrieved were 16 (range 0-43). 46 surgical patients (35.4%) had grade II or higher complications. 13 patients had a perioperative death (Clavien grade V). Four (3.1%) patients completed perioperative chemotherapy, and 13 (10%) patients had adjuvant chemo/radiotherapy. 50 (38.5%) recurred at median 13 months, while 80 (61.5%) did not have a recurrence of their cancer at any time during follow up. The 5 year DFS for the surgery only group was 67.3% and multimodality group was 52.9% (p = 0.25). The 5 year OS for the surgery only group was 38.9% and multimodality group was 47.1% (p = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that even with surgery alone, selected elderly patients with non-metastatic gastric cancer can obtain apparent prolonged survival, despite not receiving standard of care multimodality therapy. More studies are needed to optimise elderly patients' treatment selection.

Macroscopic and microscopic characteristics of low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMN) on appendectomy specimens and correlations with pseudomyxoma peritonei development risk.

Low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) is the primary source of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). PMP may develop after seemingly complete resection of primary tumor by appendectomy, which is unpredictable due to lack of reliable prognostic indicators. We retrospectively reviewed 154 surgically resected LAMNs to explore if any of the macroscopic and microscopic characteristics may be associated with increasing risk of PMP development. Our major findings include: (1) As compared to those without PMP, the cases that developed PMP were more frequent to have (a) smaller luminal diameter (<1 cm) and thicker wall, separate mucin aggregations, and microscopic perforation/rupture, all suggestive of luminal mucin leakage; (b) microscopic acellular mucin presenting on serosal surface and not being confined to mucosa; and (c) neoplastic epithelium dissecting outward beyond mucosa, however, with similar frequency of neoplastic cells being present in muscularis propria. (2) Involvement of neoplastic cells or/and acellular mucin at surgical margin did not necessarily lead to tumor recurrence or subsequent PMP, and clear margin did not absolutely prevent PMP development. (3) Coexisting diverticulum, resulted from neoplastic or non-neoplastic mucosa being herniated through muscle-lacking vascular hiatus of appendiceal wall, was seen in a quarter of LAMN cases, regardless of PMP. The diverticular portion of tumor involvement was often the weakest point where rupture occurred. In conclusion, proper evaluation of surgical specimens with search for mucin and neoplastic cells on serosa and for microscopic perforation, which are of prognostic significance, should be emphasized.

Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations - Part I: Preoperative and intraoperative management.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been shown to considerably reduce complications, length of stay and costs after most of surgical procedures by standardised application of best evidence-based perioperative care. The aim was to elaborate dedicated recommendations for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in a two-part series of guidelines based on expert consensus. The present part I of the guidelines highlights preoperative and intraoperative management. METHODS: The core group assembled a multidisciplinary panel of 24 experts involved in peritoneal surface malignancy surgery representing the fields of general surgery (n = 12), gynaecological surgery (n = 6), and anaesthesia (n = 6). Experts systematically reviewed and summarized the available evidence on 72 identified perioperative care items, following the GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, evaluation) system. Final consensus (defined as ≥50%, or ≥70% of weak/strong recommendations combined) was reached by a standardised 2-round Delphi process, regarding the strength of recommendations. RESULTS: Response rates were 100% for both Delphi rounds. Quality of evidence was evaluated high, moderate low and very low, for 15 (21%), 26 (36%), 29 (40%) and 2 items, respectively. Consensus was reached for 71/72(98.6%) items. Strong recommendations were defined for 37 items, No consensus could be reached regarding the preemptive use of fresh frozen plasma. CONCLUSION: The present ERAS recommendations for CRS±HIPEC are based on a standardised expert consensus process providing clinicians with valuable guidance. There is an urgent need to produce high quality studies for CRS±HIPEC and to prospectively evaluate recommendations in clinical practice.

Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations - Part II: Postoperative management and special considerations.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been shown to considerably reduce complications, length of stay and costs after most of surgical procedures by standardised application of best evidence-based perioperative care. The aim was to elaborate dedicated recommendations for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in a two-part series of guidelines based on expert consensus. The present part II of the guidelines highlights postoperative management and special considerations. METHODS: The core group assembled a multidisciplinary panel of 24 experts involved in peritoneal surface malignancy surgery representing the fields of general surgery (n = 12), gynaecological surgery (n = 6), and anaesthesia (n = 6). Experts systematically reviewed and summarized the available evidence on 72 identified perioperative care items, following the GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, evaluation) system. Final consensus (defined as ≥50%, or ≥70% of weak/strong recommendations combined) was reached by a standardised 2-round Delphi process, regarding the strength of recommendations. RESULTS: Response rates were 100% for both Delphi rounds. Quality of evidence was evaluated high, moderate low and very low, for 15 (21%), 26 (36%), 29 (40%) and 2 items, respectively. Consensus was reached for 71/72(98.6%) items. Strong recommendations were defined for 37 items. No consensus could be reached regarding the preemptive use of fresh frozen plasma. CONCLUSION: The present ERAS recommendations for CRS ± HIPEC are based on a standardised expert consensus process providing clinicians with valuable guidance. There is an urgent need to produce high quality studies for CRS ± HIPEC and to prospectively evaluate recommendations in clinical practice.

Evaluation of repeat cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal and colorectal cancers: a multicentre Canadian study

Background: Peritoneal recurrences after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for appendiceal and colorectal cancers are frequent. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, technical feasibility and perioperative and long-term outcomes of repeat CRS/HIPEC in patients with recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal and appendiceal origin. Methods: Data were collected from patients treated from 2000 to 2016 for recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal or colorectal cancer with CRS/HIPEC at 2 specialist centres. Data on demographics, procedure details, morbidity and survival were recorded. Analyses compared the iterations of CRS/HIPEC to assess the safety and effectiveness of repeat surgery. Results: Of all patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC in the 2 centres, 37 patients underwent a repeat procedure. Operative time was similar for the first and second surgeries (412.1 v. 412.5 min, p = 0.74) but patients had a significantly lower peritoneal carcinoma index score with the second surgery (21.8 in the first iteration v. 9.53 in the second iteration, p < 0.001) and significantly less blood loss (1762 mL in the first iteration v. 790 mL in the second iteration, p = 0.001). There was a nonsignificant decrease in grade III­IV complications and there was no 30-day mortality associated with repeat procedures. For patients with colorectal cancer, median disease-free survival was 9.6 months and median overall survival was 40 months. For patients with appendiceal cancer, median disease-free survival was 15 months and overall survival was 64.4 months. Conclusion: Repeat CRS/HIPEC procedures for recurrent appendiceal and colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis are safe in well-selected patients, without increased morbidity or mortality, and they are associated with significant long-term survival, particularly for patients with appendiceal cancers. These results support the use of repeat CRS/HIPEC in these patients.

Contexte: Les récurrences péritonéales après une chirurgie cytoréductrice (CCR) et une chimiothérapie hyperthermique intrapéritonéale (CHIP) pour les cancers de l'appendice et colorectaux sont fréquentes. Cette étude visait à évaluer l'innocuité, la faisabilité technique et les résultats périopératoires et à long terme d'une reprise de CCR/CHIP chez les patients qui présentent une récurrence de carcinomatose péritonéale ayant son origine au niveau colorectal ou de l'appendice. Méthodes: Des données ont été recueillies sur des patients traités entre 2000 et 2016 pour une récurrence de carcinomatose péritonéale ayant son origine au niveau colorectal ou de l'appendice par CCR/CHIP dans 2 centres spécialisés. On a tenu compte des données démographiques, des détails des interventions, ainsi que de la morbidité et de la survie. Des analyses ont permis de comparer les premières et deuxièmes CCR/CHIP pour évaluer l'innocuité et l'efficacité des chirurgies répétées. Résultats: De tous les patients soumis à des CCR/CHIP dans les 2 centres, 37 ont subi l'intervention de nouveau. Le temps opératoire a été similaire pour les premières et les deuxièmes chirurgies (412,1 c. 412,5 min, p = 0,74), mais les patients présentaient un score de carcinomatose péritonéale beaucoup plus bas lors de la deuxième chirurgie (21,8 pour la première intervention c. 9,53 pour la seconde, p < 0,001) et des pertes sanguines significativement moindres (1762 mL pour la première intervention c. 790 mL pour la seconde, p = 0,001). On a noté une diminution non significative des complications de grades III­IV et on n'a déploré aucune mortalité à 30 jours en lien avec la reprise de l'intervention. Pour les patients atteints d'un cancer colorectal, la survie médiane sans maladie a été de 9,6 mois et la survie médiane globale a été de 40 mois. Pour les patients atteints d'un cancer de l'appendice, la survie médiane sans maladie a été de 15 mois et la survie médiane globale a été de 64,4 mois. Conclusion: La reprise des CCR/CHIP pour les récurrences de carcinomatose péritonéale ayant leur origine au niveau colorectal ou de l'appendice est sécuritaire chez les patients soigneusement sélectionnés, sans accroissement de la morbidité ou de la mortalité, et elles sont associées à une survie à long terme significative, particulièrement chez les patients ayant un cancer de l'appendice. Ces résultats appuient la reprise des CCR/CHIP chez ces patients.

Surgical management of truncal and extremities atypical lipomatous tumors/well-differentiated liposarcoma: A systematic review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Atypical lipomatous tumors or well-differentiated liposarcomas (ALT/WDLS) are low-grade soft tissue tumors that are commonly located on the trunk and extremities. There is no consensus on the best surgical approach for ALT/WDLS. METHODS: A systematic literature review of PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus, and google scholar was performed. All published studies on trunk or extremities ALT/WDLS with reported outcome data were considered and independently screened for inclusion by at least two of the authors. RESULTS: A total of eighteen studies comprising 793 patients with ALT/WDLS were included. 580 patients underwent marginal excision, with local recurrence observed in 69 (11.9%). 213 patients underwent wide excision with local recurrence in 7(3.3%). Recurrent tumors were successfully re-resected with marginal or wide excision. Dedifferentiation was confirmed in 9 patients (1.1%), and a distant pulmonary metastasis in 1 patient (0.1%). DISCUSSION: Marginal excision of truncal or extremities ALT/WDLS results in a slightly higher local recurrence rate. However, recurrences are almost always amenable to re-resection. The findings support the use of marginal excision for truncal or extremities ALT/WDLS.

Evidence-Based Strategies for the Treatment of Peritoneal Malignancies during Health Care Resource Restriction: The COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has put enormous pressure on hospital resources, and has affected all aspects of patient care. As operative volumes decrease, cancer surgeries must be triaged and prioritized with careful thought and attention to ensure maximal benefit for the maximum number of patients. Peritoneal malignancies present a unique challenge, as surgical management can be resource intensive, but patients have limited non-surgical treatment options. This review summarizes current data on outcomes and resource utilization to help inform decision-making and case prioritization in times of constrained health care resources. Methods: A rapid literature review was performed, examining surgical and non-surgical outcomes data for peritoneal malignancies. Narrative data synthesis was cross-referenced with relevant societal guidelines. Peritoneal malignancy surgeons and medical oncologists reviewed recommendations to establish a national perspective on case triage and mitigating treatment strategies. Results and Conclusions: Triage of peritoneal malignancies during this time of restricted health care resource is nuanced and requires multidisciplinary discussion with consideration of individual patient factors. Prioritization should be given to patients where delay may compromise resectability of disease, and where alternative treatment options are lacking. Mitigating strategies such as systemic chemotherapy and/or surgical deferral may be utilized with close surveillance for disease stability or progression, which may affect surgical urgency. Unique hospital capacity, and ability to manage the complex post-operative course for these patients must also be considered to ensure patient and system needs are aligned.

Epidural analgesia? A prospective analysis of perioperative coagulation in cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is beneficial in peritoneal carcinomatosis. Epidurals provide excellent pain relief for laparotomies. Coagulopathy (platelet count <100 × 109/L, INR>1.5 or PTT >45) occurs with CRS and HIPEC, increasing risk for bleeding complications with epidurals. This prospective study characterizes clot kinetics with thromboelastography (TEG) to determine suitability for epidural analgesia. METHODS: After Research Ethics approval, thirty consented patients had blood collected. Primary data collected included TEG and conventional coagulation measures (platelets, PTT and INR). Secondary data collected included demographics, disease, surgical, intraoperative factors and complications from epidural placement. RESULTS: Of 30 patients analyzed, two had incomplete data. Four developed abnormal coagulation between the second and fifth post-operative day. For all patients, TEG values remained normal. Postoperative INR was elevated until day 3 (all INR < 1.5). 17 patients received epidural analgesia, 3 demonstrated abnormal conventional coagulopathic criteria despite normal TEG. CONCLUSIONS: In this study CRS and HIPEC do not contribute to the conventional definition of clinical coagulopathy. Clot kinetics indicate that epidural catheters may be recommended for post-operative analgesia.

Cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis from rare etiologies.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) are commonly used in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) originating from colorectal, appendiceal and ovarian cancers. It is unclear what benefit CRS/HIPEC might have for PC from uncommon etiologies, therefore we sought to describe local practice patterns and evaluate overall survival (OS). METHODS: All patients who had CRS/HIPEC between 2000 and 2016 were identified using our institutional cancer database. Patients with appendiceal, colorectal, and ovarian pathologies were excluded. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate and demonstrate 5-year OS. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with OS. RESULTS: Of all patients treated with CRS/HIPEC at our institution, 38 were treated for PC of rare origin. Etiologies included 23 patients with mesothelioma, 8 with primary peritoneal carcinoma, 4 with small bowel tumours and 3 with gastric cancer. Median OS of 35.4, 20.8, 25.4, and 20.2 months were obtained for each group respectively. 5-year OS for each pathology was 8.7%, 0.0%, 25.0%, and 33.3% respectively with corresponding mean PCI of 31.3, 23.6, 21.5, and 12.7. No independent prognostic factors were significant on Cox regression analysis. Median length of stay was 19 days. Readmission rate within 30 days of discharge was 7.9%. Rate of Grade III/IV complications was 34.2%. No thirty-day mortality. CONCLUSION: Survivals beyond 20 months can be obtained with the use of CRS/HIPEC for rare PC etiologies aligning with results of other groups. CRS/HIPEC in well-selected patients demonstrates a clinical benefit and this could be confirmed with a multi-institutional study.

Surgical excision versus observation as initial management of desmoid tumors: A population based study.

SYNOPSIS: Desmoid tumors can be safely managed with watchful waiting, including either observation alone or tamoxifen/NSAIDs. Surgery at first presentation can be associated with significant treatment burden. BACKGROUND: Immediate surgery was historically recommended for desmoid tumors. Recently, watchful waiting, (tamoxifen/NSAIDs or observation alone), has been advocated. METHODS: All diagnoses of desmoid tumor within the Alberta Cancer Registry from August 2004 to September 2015 were identified. Patients with FAP were excluded. Demographics, tumor characteristics and treatment and outcome data were collected. Outcomes were compared between immediate surgery and watchful waiting. The effect of abdominal wall site on progression and recurrence and the effect of microscopic margin on recurrence were assessed with Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: We identified 111 non-FAP patients. Median follow-up was 35 months from diagnosis. 74% were female. Mean age was 42. Fifty (45%) underwent watchful waiting, of whom 21(42%) progressed, with median PFS of 10 months. Fifty-three (48%) underwent resection at presentation, of whom 8 (15%) recurred, with median disease-free survival of 22 months. Abdominal wall lesions were equally represented in both groups, and equally likely to progress on watchful waiting (50% vs 39%, p = 0.53), but there was a trend toward decreased recurrence after surgery. (5% vs 23%, p = 0.08). Microscopic margin had no effect on recurrence (14% of margin negative vs 20% of margin positive, p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Watchful waiting was successful in 58% of patients, and a further 28% only required one aggressive treatment thereafter, for a total of 86%. Surgery had a favorable recurrence rate (15%), but some recurrences were associated with significant treatment burden. Treatment should be tailored to individual patients in a multidisciplinary setting. A trial of observation appears warranted in most patients. Recurrence rate was not affected by positive margins.