Performance measures for the SACRED team-centered approach to advanced gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative.

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and United European Gastroenterology have defined performance measures for upper and lower gastrointestinal, pancreaticobiliary, and small-bowel endoscopy. Quality indicators to guide endoscopists in the growing field of advanced endoscopy are also underway. We propose that equal attention is given to developing the entire advanced endoscopy team and not the individual endoscopist alone.We suggest that the practice of teams intending to deliver high quality advanced endoscopy is underpinned by six crucial principles concerning: selection, acceptance, complications, reconnaissance, envelopment, and documentation (SACRED).

Colonoscopy in patients with liver cirrhosis : success and safety issues.

BACKGROUND: Patients with liver cirrhosis undergo screening colonoscopy before liver transplantation. Screening colonoscopy is subject to specific quality criteria, among which caecal intubation rate. Several factors associated with failed caecal intubation have been identified. AIMS: We investigated whether liver cirrhosis influenced success and safety of screening colonoscopy. METHODS: Caecal intubation and complication rate of 93 candidates for liver transplantation due to liver cirrhosis were compared with the control rates of our endoscopy unit. Several patient and colonoscopy variables were taken into account. RESULTS: In patients with liver cirrhosis caecal intubation rate was only 83%, whereas in the control group it was 94% (P<0.0001). The presence of high volume ascites tends to compromise a successful colonoscopy. Serious complication rate was 0,4% in controls without colonoscopy-related mortality. In the cirrhotic population two severe complications were encountered (2,2%, P<0.05) and one patient died due to colonic perforation and sepsis (mortality 1.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Caecal intubation rate is significantly lower in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing screening colonoscopy, possibly related to the presence of ascites. Complication and mortality rate of screening colonoscopy is significantly higher in patients being screened for liver transplantation.

Renewed attention for overtube-assisted colonoscopy to prevent incomplete endoscopic examination of the colon.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is the standard examination to detect mucosal pathology in the colon. However, failure to complete colonoscopy may reach more than 10% in population-based endoscopy practices. The reasons for incomplete conventional colonoscopy are diverse and result in missed diagnosis of colonic polyps and carcinoma. OBJECTIVE: Recent endoscopic developments have shown that the use of specialized overtubes may help to reach the cecum in the case of a difficult colonoscopy, even with less discomfort. Several types of overtubes are currently available, whereas other types are being developed and clinically evaluated. The current review highlights the development of overtubes for colonoscopy and the available clinical data on overtube-assisted colonoscopy in the case of incomplete conventional colonoscopy. DATA SOURCES: Data were derived from a PubMed search through November 2012. STUDY SELECTION: Available clinical literature data on recent developments in overtube-assisted colonoscopy were studied. INTERVENTION: A descriptive comparison was made of currently available endoscopy systems used for overtube-assisted colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were the feasibility and safety of different endoscopy systems to perform overtube-assisted colonoscopy. RESULTS: Several overtube-assisted colonoscopy systems have recently been developed to complete colonoscopy in the case of difficult conventional colonoscopy. Literature data show excellent feasibility to reach the cecum with very low complication rates and good patient tolerance for the different overtube systems. LIMITATIONS: The majority of available studies are uncontrolled case series describing 7 to 110 patients undergoing overtube-assisted colonoscopy with only 1 direct comparison between 2 overtube systems. CONCLUSIONS: Overtube-assisted colonoscopy has been shown to be useful in performing colonoscopy by increasing the cecal intubation rate and patient tolerance and by decreasing the need for sedation. There is no standardized superior overtube system at this moment.

Safety of pull-type and introducer percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes in oncology patients: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) allows long-term tube feeding. Safety of pull-type and introducer PEG placement in oncology patients with head/neck or oesophageal malignancies is unknown. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 299 patients undergoing PEG tube placement between January 2006 and December 2008 revealed 57 oncology patients. All patients with head/neck or oesophageal malignancy were treated with chemo- and radiotherapy. In case of high-grade stenosis introducer Freka® Pexact PEG tube was placed (n = 24) and in all other patients (n = 33) conventional pull-type PEG tube. Short-term complications and mortality rates were compared. RESULTS: Patients' characteristics and clinical status were comparable in both groups. Short-term complications were encountered in 11/24 (48%) introducer PEG patients as compared to only 4/33 (12%) pull-type PEG patients (P < 0.05). Accidental removal of the introducer PEG tube occurred in 4/24 (17%) with need for surgical intervention in 1 vs. 0/33 (0%, P < 0.05). Wound infection occurred in 3/24 (12%) leading to septic shock and admission to intensive care unit (ICU) in 1 vs. 3/33 (9%, NS). Finally, 3/24 gastrointestinal perforations (12%) resulted from a difficult placement procedure vs. 1/33 (3%), leading to urgent surgical intervention and admission to ICU. Two introducer PEG patients died at ICU, resulting in an overall mortality rate of 8% vs. 0% (P = 0.091). CONCLUSION: The introducer Freka® Pexact PEG procedure for long-term tube feeding may lead to significantly higher complication and mortality rates in patients with head/neck or oesophageal malignancies treated with chemo- and radiotherapy. It is suggested to use the conventional pull-type PEG tube placement in this group of patients, if possible.

Cecal intubation rate with the double-balloon endoscope after incomplete conventional colonoscopy: a study in 45 patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Conventional colonoscopy is the gold standard for colorectal cancer screening. However, a failure rate to complete conventional colonoscopy of more than 10% is reported in the literature. We evaluated whether the therapeutic Fujinon double-balloon endoscope EN-450T5/20 is a valuable tool to intubate the cecum and to carry out all conventional endoscopic procedures after incomplete conventional colonoscopy. METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients with prior incomplete conventional colonoscopy were prospectively enrolled. All but three procedures were carried out under conscious sedation with the patient in the left lateral decubitus position without fluoroscopic guidance. RESULTS: The cecum was reached in 42 of 45 patients (93%) and in 62% additional therapeutic interventions were carried out. Double-balloon colonoscopy required less conscious sedation compared to conventional colonoscopy. No external abdominal compression nor fluoroscopic control was used. The insertion depth of the double-balloon endoscope did not exceed the working length of a conventional colonoscope. CONCLUSIONS: The present study illustrates that the concept of double-balloon endoscopy is a valuable alternative to reach the cecum after prior incomplete conventional colonoscopy, especially due to redundant colon and colonic loop formation. The procedure requires less conscious sedation and no fluoroscopic control, but allows all conventional endoscopic interventions.