Associations between Hospital Setting and Outcomes after Pediatric Appendectomy.

Prior studies of associations between hospital location and outcomes for pediatric appendectomy have not adjusted for significant differences in patient and treatment patterns between settings. This was a cross-sectional analysis of pediatric appendectomies in the 2016 Kids' Inpatient Database (KID). Weighted multiple linear and logistic regression models compared hospital location (urban or rural) and academic status against total admission cost (TAC), length of stay (LOS), and postoperative complications. Patients were stratified by laparoscopic (LA) or open (OA) appendectomy. Among 54,836 patients, 39,454 (73%) were performed at an urban academic center, 11,642 (21%) were performed at an urban non-academic center, and 3740 (7%) were performed at a rural center. LA was utilized for 49,011 (89%) of all 54,386 patients: 36,049 (91%) of 39,454 patients at urban academic hospitals, 10,191 (87%) of 11,642 patients at urban non-academic centers, and 2771 (74%) of 3740 patients at rural centers (p < 0.001). On adjusted analysis, urban academic centers were associated with an 18% decreased TAC (95% CI -0.193--0.165; p < 0.001) despite an 11% increased LOS (95% CI 0.087-0.134; p < 0.001) compared to rural centers. Urban academic centers were associated with a decreased odds of complication among patients who underwent LA (OR 0.787, 95% CI 0.650-0.952) but not after OA. After adjusting for relevant patient and disease-related factors, urban academic centers were associated with lower costs despite longer lengths of stay compared to rural centers. Urban academic centers utilized LA more frequently and were associated with decreased odds of postoperative complications after LA.

Mortality in the Emergency Department and the Effectiveness of Conventional Safety Event Reporting.

Background Patient mortality reviews identify care, system, and process deficiencies. Patient deaths undergo quarterly review in our academic emergency department (ED), whereas in other departments, mortality reviews are requested by the pronouncing physician within 24 hours. In the ED, individual physicians encounter barriers to 24-hour reviews, including feasibility, the perception of futility, re-exposure to traumatic events, and a high frequency of pre-hospital and non-preventable deaths. This quality review aimed to determine the preventable death rate, contributing factors to ED patient mortality, cases requiring further review, and the capture rate of individual case submissions into the patient safety reporting system. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on all patient deaths occurring in our ED from July 2019 to February 2020. All patients 18 years or older who were pronounced dead in the ED during our data collection period were included. Patients declared deceased pre-hospital, on an inpatient floor, or in the operating room were excluded. Deaths were assessed for characteristics such as sex, presence of a pulse upon arrival, diagnostics and interventions performed, and whether the cause of death was traumatic or medical. Deaths were categorized on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "not preventable" to "likely preventable." The presence or absence of contributing factors and the need for further review were recorded. Results Of the 166 reviewed cases, 87% (n=144) were non-preventable due to a terminal condition upon arrival, 12% (n=20) were non-preventable despite maximal efforts, 0.6% (n=1) were non-preventable despite a medical or systems error, and 0.6% (n=1) were possibly preventable due to a medical or systems error. No cases were definitively preventable. Only 1.2% (n=2) of cases required further safety review. In 55% (n=91) of cases, the patient arrived without a pulse. Medical deaths (60%, n=100) outnumbered traumatic deaths (39%, n=64). The most utilized diagnostic test was ultrasound (67%, n=111), and the most utilized intervention was advanced cardiac life support (59%, n=98). Conclusion There is a high prevalence of unpreventable deaths in the ED (99%, n=164). Only two cases (1.2%) were identified for further patient safety review. Standard safety event reporting practices correctly identified all possibly preventable ED deaths.

Successful Nonextracorporeal Life Support Resuscitation and Rewarming of a Patient with Hypothermia in Cardiac Arrest.

We report full recovery of a patient with hypothermia in cardiac arrest following continuous and prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and conventional, nonextracorporeal life support (non-ECLS) methods. A 57-y-old man presented with unwitnessed cardiac arrest and a core temperature of 23°C (73°F). The presenting cardiac rhythm was ventricular fibrillation. The team administered epinephrine and performed defibrillation and CPR. Because ECLS was unavailable at the facility, the medical team externally and internally rewarmed the patient using heated blankets, forced warmed air, thoracic lavage, and warmed IV fluids. The patient achieved return of spontaneous circulation after 4 h 56 min of continuous CPR and rewarming. The medical team admitted the patient to the intensive care unit. He achieved full neurologic recovery the following day. When ECLS is not available and transfer is not appropriate because of patient instability or hospital location, conventional rewarming methods and continuous, prolonged CPR can lead to successful outcomes in patients with hypothermia in cardiac arrest. This case demonstrates that CPR in patients with hypothermia-associated cardiac arrest can lead to full recovery.