HIV Infection in North African Patients.

North Africa is one of the rare regions where the HIV epidemic is growing. In France, 5% of the migrants discovering their HIV infection are from North Africa. The objective of this study was to compare the sociodemographic characteristics and outcomes of North African and French HIV-infected patients. This study was conducted in the HIV clinic of Bichat Hospital (Paris, France). The North African HIV-infected patients were born in Algeria, Tunisia, or Morocco or had lived there for more than 6 months. They were matched for age and gender (1:2) to patients born in France who had never lived outside France for more than 6 months. Sociodemographic, clinical, and immunovirological characteristics of North African and French patients were compared using conditional logistic regression. Among 4,738 eligible patients, 285 North Africans were identified. CD4 levels at HIV diagnosis were not significantly different between North African and French patients, but were more frequently <200/mm3 in the former than the latter at treatment initiation (p = .02). CDC stage 3 disease occurred more frequently in the first 3 years of care in our center in North African patients than in French patients (p = .01), and control of the HIV viral load over the 12 months preceding inclusion was better in French patients (p = .0001). There was no difference regarding loss to care. These results highlight possible issues in adherence to antiretroviral treatment in North African patients, which may be related to differences in the acceptability of the disease.

Incidence of and risk factors for medical care interruption in people living with HIV in recent years.

OBJECTIVES: With HIV treatment as a prevention strategy, retention in care remains a key for sustained viral suppression. We sought to identify HIV-infected patients at risk for medical care interruption (MCI) in a high-income country. METHODS: The HIV-infected patients enrolled had to attend the clinic at least twice between January 2010 and October 2014 and were followed up until May 2016. MCI was defined as patients not seeking care in or outside the clinic for at least 18 months, regardless of whether they returned to care after the interruption. The association between MCI and sociodemographic, clinical, and immuno-virological characteristics at HIV diagnosis and during follow-up was assessed using Cox models. RESULTS: The incidence rate of MCI was 2.5 per 100 persons-years (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.3-2.7). MCI was more likely in patients who accessed care >6 months after diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.10-1.54 vs. ≤6 months) or did not report a primary care physician (HR = 2.40; 95% CI = 2.03-2.84). MCI was less likely in patients born in sub-Saharan Africa (HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.62-0.91 vs. born in France). During follow-up, the risk of MCI increased when the last CD4 count was ≤350 (HR = 2.85, 95% CI = 2.02-4.04 vs. >500 cells/mm3) and when the patient was not on antiretroviral therapy (HR = 3.67, 95% CI = 2.90-4.66). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of MCI is low in this hospital that serves a large proportion of migrants. Low or no recorded CD4 counts for a medical visit could alert of a higher risk of MCI, even more in patients who accessed HIV care late or did not report a primary care physician.