Clozapine and neutrophil response in patients of African descent: A six-month, multinational, prospective, open-label clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but it is markedly underutilized, particularly in the US Black population, partly because of concern over clozapine-associated low absolute neutrophil count (ANC). People of African descent have a lower normative ANC range than the White population, which is associated with a specific "ACKR1-null" ("Duffy null") CC genotype (SNP rs2814778) on the ACKR1 gene, termed benign ethnic neutropenia (BEN). The range of ANC variability and safety of clozapine have not been established in people with BEN or examined prospectively in people of African descent. METHODS: We completed a multisite, 6-month, prospective, open-label clinical trial of clozapine treatment in people of African descent with schizophrenia spectrum disorders for whom clozapine was clinically indicated, with or without the ACKR1-null genotype. We examined clozapine safety and weekly ANC during clozapine treatment and evaluated ANC variability by ACKR1-null genotype, sex, study site, and clozapine dosing using repeated measures analysis of covariance. Genotype was assayed using TaqMan® technology. RESULTS: We enrolled 274 participants, of whom 227 (82.8 %) completed 6 months of clozapine treatment. There was one case of severe neutropenia (<500 cells/mm3) (0.36 %) over 1467.6 person-months of clozapine exposure. This participant recovered without sequelae after discontinuation of clozapine. Of the 249 participants with known genotypes, 199 (79.9 %) had the ACKR1-null genotype. Neutropenia (<1500 cells/mm3) occurred significantly more often in the ACKR1-null group (33 % [65/199]) than in those with the T allele (6 % (3/50); p < 0.001). Fourteen (5 %) patients discontinued due to adverse events. Rates of infection and fever were low and sialorrhea was the commonest side effect (N = 187, 68 %). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest prospective clozapine trial in people of African descent. Severe neutropenia was rare, despite the high prevalence (80 %) of the ACKR1-null genotype. Our findings suggest that clozapine can be used safely in Black patients including those with BEN.

Anti-aggressive effects of clozapine in involuntarily committed black patients with severe mental illness.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with severe mental illness are falsely characterized as aggressive by the media, perpetuating stigma. While exaggerated, some patients with severe mental illness are more aggressive without treatment. Clozapine may have a unique anti-aggressive effect in patients with schizophrenia-related disorders, independent of antipsychotic or sedative effects. Limited data in forensic and involuntary committed patients is currently available. PURPOSE: This study evaluates clozapine's effects on hostility and aggression in court-ordered Black patients. METHODS: This study analyzes a subgroup of Black patients from a larger prospective 24-week open-label clozapine study. All patients were involuntarily committed and enrolled from two participating state psychiatric hospitals. The primary outcome measured was total use of 'as needed' (PRN) or 'immediate need' (STAT) medications for aggression/hostility. Secondary outcomes included number and duration of seclusion and restraint (S/R) episodes, and changes in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) hostility factor score. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were included in our analysis. Significant reductions were noted in PRN/STAT medication use over time (χ2 = 6.90; p = 0.008) and the BPRS hostility factor score was reduced by 30% over the 24 weeks (F = 4.34, df = 62, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with clozapine effectively reduced hostility and aggression within this cohort of involuntarily committed Black patients with mental illness compared to baseline. Specifically, it helped lower the total number of PRN/STAT medication administrations and improved clinician-rated hostility factor scores on the BPRS. Our findings are pertinent as data in forensic settings is lacking and Black patients have been infrequently included in large prospective clinical trials with clozapine. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02404155.

Feasibility and patient-reported satisfaction using a novel point-of-care fingerstick method for monitoring absolute neutrophil count for clozapine.

BACKGROUND: Clozapine is an effective antipsychotic for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. One limitation of clozapine use is required monitoring of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) because of the risk of clozapine-induced neutropenia. Standard monitoring requires venous blood draws, which is a significant barrier to clozapine use. METHODS: This study assesses the feasibility of use and physician and patient satisfaction of a novel point-of-care (POC) measure of ANC using Athelas One, a device that calculates white blood cell count and ANC using a fingerstick blood sample. This is a subanalysis of a prospective, open-label clinical trial of clozapine treatment, during which patients received a venous blood draw and a capillary fingerstick at baseline and Week 2 of the study, and completed a 5-point Likert scale, comparing the 2 methods. RESULTS: Patients reported benefits from the fingerstick technology, including POC testing being important for their doctors and their health, improved treatment, avoiding sending blood away, and convenience. There was a trend for less concern about the effects of blood draws on health with a fingerstick, and greater physician satisfaction with POC sampling. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests the feasibility, satisfaction, and ease by both clinicians and patients of using POC testing for ANC monitoring during clozapine treatment.

Clozapine in Reducing Aggression and Violence in Forensic Populations.

Popular media often portray people with a mental illness as being aggressive, violent, and incarcerated as a result of their behavior. Despite exaggeration in the media, risks for some aggressive behaviors are in fact higher in individuals with schizophrenia. This is often the case with influence of comorbid substance use disorders. It is essential that mental health professionals are aware of treatments that may help with attenuating and treating behaviors that contribute to violence, aggression and incarceration. This paper reviews violence and incarceration in individuals with schizophrenia as well as recommendations, guidelines and benefits for the use of clozapine in this population. Clozapine remains one of the most underutilized evidence-based medications available in the psychiatric arena in the United States. It is a viable and recommended option in the forensic population and it may be helpful on the path to recovery as well as bring substantial savings to the criminal justice system.

Risperidone, quetiapine, and fluphenazine in the treatment of patients with therapy-refractory schizophrenia.

This 12-week, double-blind study evaluated the effectiveness of risperidone (4 mg/day), quetiapine (400 mg/day), or fluphenazine (12.5 mg/day) in a stringently defined treatment-resistant population of people with schizophrenia. No differences were noted in total Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) or Clinical Global Impression scores among the drug groups (n = 38). More subjects tended to complete the study on risperidone (69%) or quetiapine (58%) than those treated with fluphenazine (31%; P value not significant). Eighty-nine percent of those who discontinued on fluphenazine (8 of 9) were due to lack of efficacy. Discontinuation due to adverse effects was low, with only 2 subjects (both on quetiapine) stopping due to side effects. Three of 13 risperidone-treated subjects (23%) and 3 of 12 quetiapine-treated subjects (25%) met response criteria (decrease of 20% of total BPRS score), whereas 2 of 13 subjects (15%) responded to fluphenazine. Side effect occurrence was similar among drug groups and EPS ratings on the Simpson Angus Scale improved in all drug groups (quetiapine, 1.64; risperidone, 1.30; fluphenazine, 0.69; P value not significant). Despite the newer class of second-generation antipsychotic medications, this treatment-resistant population remains difficult to treat. Many people have only minimal to modest improvements with antipsychotic treatment and most continue to have residual psychotic symptoms. Treatment with first- and second-generation antipsychotics may demonstrate similar efficacy; however, patients treated with second-generation antipsychotics may be more likely to adhere to treatment.

Atypical antipsychotic use in a state hospital inpatient adolescent population.

Atypical antipsychotics are now the most commonly prescribed antipsychotics in young patients. These drugs are increasingly being used because of better tolerance and safety as seen in the adult populations. Youth with more severe psychopathology who are treated in the inpatient setting have been overlooked in much of the published research, and the extent of use and rationale in this population is unknown. This naturalistic retrospective study examined a population of adolescents in an inpatient state hospital setting with regard to their use of atypical antipsychotics. All patients who received an inpatient prescription for atypical antipsychotics between January 1, 1997 and June 1, 2000 and were ages 18 or younger at the time of medication initiation were included in the study. Twenty-three percent (88/380) of patients received an atypical antipsychotic: 68% (60/88) risperidone, 27% (24/88) olanzapine, and 5% (4/88) quetiapine. Psychotic disorders were considered as the primary diagnosis in only 17% of patients treated with atypical antipsychotics, and no particular diagnosis was predictive of monotherapy with an atypical antipsychotic. In the adolescent populations, atypical antipsychotics are being used for a wide variety of diagnoses and are commonly used adjunctively (more than 80%) with many concomitant psychotropic medications. More research is needed to develop useful and specific practice guidelines in children and adolescents for these commonly used medications.

Expert consensus-based medication-use evaluation criteria for atypical antipsychotic drugs.

Medication-use criteria for the appropriate use of atypical antipsychotics were developed through a national consensus process utilizing an expert panel. A written survey was prepared which asked for opinions about options for psychopharmacologic interventions with seven antipsychotic drugs or categories (clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone, long-acting intramuscular decanoate ester preparations of conventional antipsychotics, and oral conventional antipsychotics) in 19 specific clinical situations. The survey was sent to 50 psychiatrists and psychiatric pharmacist specialists, 42 (84%) of whom completed the survey. The survey was formatted as a grid with rows listing various clinical situations and columns itemizing the various antipsychotic medications relevant to the situations. Responses were scored using a 9-point scale for rating the level of medical review required for any given decision. Consensus on each option was defined as a nonrandom distribution of scores by a chi-square goodness-of-fit test. Consensus was reached for 1179 of the 1230 items reviewed. Use of clozapine as a first-line therapy warranted prospective or mandated review for all diagnoses. Use of nonclozapine atypical agents for schizophrenia and schizoaffective and delusional disorders was judged to be the standard of care. Oral conventional antipsychotic agents were not considered the standard of care for any indication. Combination antipsychotic treatment always warranted at least concurrent review. Continued concerns about the use of ziprasidone and its cardiac effects were apparent. This study demonstrated the utility of a consensus-based process in addressing issues and practices not adequately addressed in the scientific literature.