Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMJ ; 338: b613, 2009 Mar 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19318699

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate any long term effects on mortality in participants in experimental research related to chemical warfare agents from 1941 to 1989. DESIGN: Historical cohort study. Data sources Archive of UK government research facility at Porton Down, UK military personnel records, and national death and cancer records. Participants 18,276 male members of the UK armed forces who had spent one or more short periods (median 4 days between first and last test) at Porton Down and a comparison group of 17,600 non-Porton Down veterans followed to 31 December 2004. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality rate ratio of Porton Down compared with non-Porton Down veterans and standardised mortality ratio of each veteran group compared with the general population. Both ratios adjusted for age group and calendar period. RESULTS: Porton Down veterans were similar to non-Porton Down veterans in year of enlistment (median 1951) but had longer military service (median 6.2 v 5.0 years). After a median follow-up of 43 years, 40% (7306) of Porton Down and 39% (6900) of non-Porton Down veterans had died. All cause mortality was slightly greater in Porton Down veterans (rate ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.10, P<0.001), more so for deaths outside the UK (1.26, 1.09 to 1.46). Of 12 cause specific groups examined, rate ratios in Porton Down veterans were increased for deaths attributed to infectious and parasitic (1.57, 1.07 to 2.29), genitourinary (1.46, 1.04 to 2.04), circulatory (1.07, 1.01 to 1.12), and external (non-medical) (1.17, 1.00 to 1.37) causes and decreased for deaths attributed to in situ, benign, and unspecified neoplasms (0.60, 0.37 to 0.99). There was no clear relation between type of chemical exposure and cause specific mortality. The mortality in both groups of veterans was lower than that in the general population (standardised mortality ratio 0.88, 0.85 to 0.90; 0.82, 0.80 to 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality was slightly higher in Porton Down than non-Porton Down veterans. With lack of information on other important factors, such as smoking or service overseas, it is not possible to attribute the small excess mortality to chemical exposures at Porton Down.


Subject(s)
Cause of Death , Chemical Warfare Agents/toxicity , Chemical Warfare/statistics & numerical data , Human Experimentation/statistics & numerical data , Military Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Research Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , United Kingdom , Veterans/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
2.
BMJ ; 338: b655, 2009 Mar 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19318700

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine cancer morbidity in members of the armed forces who took part in tests of chemical warfare agents from 1941 to 1989. DESIGN: Historical cohort study, with cohort members followed up to December 2004. DATA SOURCE: Archive of UK government research facility at Porton Down, UK military personnel records, and national death and cancer records. PARTICIPANTS: All veterans included in the cohort study of mortality, excluding those known to have died or been lost to follow-up before 1 January 1971 when the UK cancer registration system commenced: 17,013 male members of the UK armed forces who took part in tests (Porton Down veterans) and a similar group of 16,520 men who did not (non-Porton Down veterans). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cancer morbidity in each group of veterans; rate ratios, with 95% confidence intervals, adjusted for age group and calendar period. RESULTS: 3457 cancers were reported in the Porton Down veterans compared with 3380 cancers in the non-Porton Down veterans. While overall cancer morbidity was the same in both groups (rate ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.95 to 1.05), Porton Down veterans had higher rates of ill defined malignant neoplasms (1.12, 1.02 to 1.22), in situ neoplasms (1.45, 1.06 to 2.00), and those of uncertain or unknown behaviour (1.32, 1.01 to 1.73). CONCLUSION: Overall cancer morbidity in Porton Down veterans was no different from that in non-Porton Down veterans.


Subject(s)
Chemical Warfare Agents/toxicity , Chemical Warfare/statistics & numerical data , Human Experimentation/statistics & numerical data , Military Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/mortality , Research Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United Kingdom , Veterans , Young Adult
3.
Ann Occup Hyg ; 53(1): 83-97, 2009 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19131404

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study describes exposures to military veterans who participated between 1941 and 1989 in British research at Porton Down on the effects of exposure to chemical warfare agents and to defences against those agents. The study is part of a programme of epidemiological research initiated in response to service veterans' concerns about possible long-term health effects of their participation. METHODS: All entries in 97 books held in the Porton Down historical experimental archive covering the years 1939-1989 were reviewed. For tests between April 1941 and December 1989, data were abstracted on chemicals used, with additional detail abstracted for tests involving vesicants and nerve agents. For tests recorded during 1939-1941, similar data were abstracted for a representative sample of tests. RESULTS: Historical data were abstracted for 17 303 veterans included in the cohort study of 18,276 servicemen who took part in tests at Porton Down between 1941 and 1989. The median number of days per veteran on which tests were carried out was 2 days. The median difference between the last and first day of testing was 4 days. A large number of chemicals were tested over this period (n = 492). The type of chemical tested varied over time. Exposures were often modified by respirator use or use of protective clothing or protective equipment. It was possible to assign a quantitative measure of cumulative exposure to 73% of veterans exposed to the vesicant sulphur mustard--3491 (34%) of exposed veterans had cumulative exposures > or =10.63 mg and for 70% of veterans exposed to the nerve agent sarin--658 (29%) of exposed veterans had cumulative exposures > or =15.0 mg min m(-3). Ninety-three per cent of veterans exposed to sulphur mustard were classified to a semi-quantitative scale of dermal effect--3771 (37%) had a vesicle or necrosed area, and 69% of veterans exposed to sarin could be categorized by change in blood cholinesterase activity--1033 (31%) had a depression in cholinesterase activity of > or =30%. CONCLUSIONS: The experimental archive at Porton Down has proved to be a rich source of data on tests conducted between 1941 and 1989. It has been possible to categorize most veterans according to date of test, chemical group, chemical, type of protection and, for certain chemicals, level of exposure and/or degree of acute toxicity. These categorizations have been used to assign veterans to exposure groups for epidemiological analysis.


Subject(s)
Chemical Warfare Agents/toxicity , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Human Experimentation , Chemical Warfare Agents/analysis , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Male , Veterans/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL