Predicting glaucoma before onset using a large language model chatbot.

PURPOSE: To investigate the capability of ChatGPT for forecasting the conversion from ocular hypertension (OHT) to glaucoma based on the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 3008 eyes of 1504 subjects from the OHTS were included in the study. METHODS: We selected demographic, clinical, ocular, optic nerve head, and visual field (VF) parameters one year prior to glaucoma development from the OHTS participants. Subsequently, we developed queries by converting tabular parameters into textual format based on both eyes of all participants. We used the ChatGPT application program interface (API) to automatically perform ChatGPT prompting for all subjects. We then investigated whether ChatGPT can accurately forecast conversion from OHT to glaucoma based on various objective metrics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and weighted F1 score. RESULTS: ChatGPT4.0 demonstrated an accuracy of 75%, AUC of 0.67, sensitivity of 56%, specificity of 78%, and weighted F1 score of 0.77 in predicting conversion to glaucoma one year before onset. ChatGPT3.5 provided an accuracy of 61%, AUC of 0.62, sensitivity of 64%, specificity of 59%, and weighted F1 score of 0.63 in predicting conversion to glaucoma one year before onset. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of ChatGPT4.0 in forecasting development of glaucoma one year before onset was reasonable. The overall performance of ChatGPT4.0 was consistently higher than ChatGPT3.5. Large language models (LLMs) hold great promise for augmenting glaucoma research capabilities and enhancing clinical care. Future efforts in creating ophthalmology specific LLMs that leverage multi-modal data in combination with active learning may lead to more useful integration with clinical practice and deserve further investigations.

Domain Adaptation-Based Deep Learning Model for Forecasting and Diagnosis of Glaucoma Disease.

The main factor causing irreversible blindness is glaucoma. Early detection greatly reduces the risk of further vision loss. To address this problem, we developed a domain adaptation-based deep learning model called Glaucoma Domain Adaptation (GDA) based on 66,742 fundus photographs collected from 3272 eyes of 1636 subjects. GDA learns domain-invariant and domain-specific representations to extract both general and specific features. We also developed a progressive weighting mechanism to accurately transfer the source domain knowledge while mitigating the transfer of negative knowledge from the source to the target domain. We employed low-rank coding for aligning the source and target distributions. We trained GDA based on three different scenarios including eyes annotated as glaucoma due to 1) optic disc abnormalities regardless of visual field abnormalities, 2) optic disc or visual field abnormalities except ones that are glaucoma due to both optic disc and visual field abnormalities at the same time, and 3) visual field abnormalities regardless of optic disc abnormalities We then evaluate the generalizability of GDA based on two independent datasets. The AUCs of GDA in forecasting glaucoma based on the first, second, and third scenarios were 0.90, 0.88, and 0.80 and the Accuracies were 0.82, 0.78, and 0.72, respectively. The AUCs of GDA in diagnosing glaucoma based on the first, second, and third scenarios were 0.98, 0.96, and 0.93 and the Accuracies were 0.93, 0.91, and 0.88, respectively. The proposed GDA model achieved high performance and generalizability for forecasting and diagnosis of glaucoma disease from fundus photographs. GDA may augment glaucoma research and clinical practice in identifying patients with glaucoma and forecasting those who may develop glaucoma thus preventing future vision loss.

Automated Category and Trend Analysis of Scientific Articles on Ophthalmology Using Large Language Models: Development and Usability Study.

BACKGROUND: In this paper, we present an automated method for article classification, leveraging the power of large language models (LLMs). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the applicability of various LLMs based on textual content of scientific ophthalmology papers. METHODS: We developed a model based on natural language processing techniques, including advanced LLMs, to process and analyze the textual content of scientific papers. Specifically, we used zero-shot learning LLMs and compared Bidirectional and Auto-Regressive Transformers (BART) and its variants with Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) and its variants, such as distilBERT, SciBERT, PubmedBERT, and BioBERT. To evaluate the LLMs, we compiled a data set (retinal diseases [RenD] ) of 1000 ocular disease-related articles, which were expertly annotated by a panel of 6 specialists into 19 distinct categories. In addition to the classification of articles, we also performed analysis on different classified groups to find the patterns and trends in the field. RESULTS: The classification results demonstrate the effectiveness of LLMs in categorizing a large number of ophthalmology papers without human intervention. The model achieved a mean accuracy of 0.86 and a mean F1-score of 0.85 based on the RenD data set. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed framework achieves notable improvements in both accuracy and efficiency. Its application in the domain of ophthalmology showcases its potential for knowledge organization and retrieval. We performed a trend analysis that enables researchers and clinicians to easily categorize and retrieve relevant papers, saving time and effort in literature review and information gathering as well as identification of emerging scientific trends within different disciplines. Moreover, the extendibility of the model to other scientific fields broadens its impact in facilitating research and trend analysis across diverse disciplines.

Performance of ChatGPT in Diagnosis of Corneal Eye Diseases.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the capabilities of ChatGPT-4.0 and ChatGPT-3.5 for diagnosing corneal eye diseases based on case reports and compare with human experts. METHODS: We randomly selected 20 cases of corneal diseases including corneal infections, dystrophies, and degenerations from a publicly accessible online database from the University of Iowa. We then input the text of each case description into ChatGPT-4.0 and ChatGPT-3.5 and asked for a provisional diagnosis. We finally evaluated the responses based on the correct diagnoses, compared them with the diagnoses made by 3 corneal specialists (human experts), and evaluated interobserver agreements. RESULTS: The provisional diagnosis accuracy based on ChatGPT-4.0 was 85% (17 correct of 20 cases), whereas the accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5 was 60% (12 correct cases of 20). The accuracy of 3 corneal specialists compared with ChatGPT-4.0 and ChatGPT-3.5 was 100% (20 cases, P = 0.23, P = 0.0033), 90% (18 cases, P = 0.99, P = 0.6), and 90% (18 cases, P = 0.99, P = 0.6), respectively. The interobserver agreement between ChatGPT-4.0 and ChatGPT-3.5 was 65% (13 cases), whereas the interobserver agreement between ChatGPT-4.0 and 3 corneal specialists was 85% (17 cases), 80% (16 cases), and 75% (15 cases), respectively. However, the interobserver agreement between ChatGPT-3.5 and each of 3 corneal specialists was 60% (12 cases). CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of ChatGPT-4.0 in diagnosing patients with various corneal conditions was markedly improved than ChatGPT-3.5 and promising for potential clinical integration. A balanced approach that combines artificial intelligence-generated insights with clinical expertise holds a key role for unveiling its full potential in eye care.

Applications of artificial intelligence-enabled robots and chatbots in ophthalmology: recent advances and future trends.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), robotics, and chatbots have brought these technologies to the forefront of medicine, particularly ophthalmology. These technologies have been applied in diagnosis, prognosis, surgical operations, and patient-specific care in ophthalmology. It is thus both timely and pertinent to assess the existing landscape, recent advances, and trajectory of trends of AI, AI-enabled robots, and chatbots in ophthalmology. RECENT FINDINGS: Some recent developments have integrated AI enabled robotics with diagnosis, and surgical procedures in ophthalmology. More recently, large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT have shown promise in augmenting research capabilities and diagnosing ophthalmic diseases. These developments may portend a new era of doctor-patient-machine collaboration. SUMMARY: Ophthalmology is undergoing a revolutionary change in research, clinical practice, and surgical interventions. Ophthalmic AI-enabled robotics and chatbot technologies based on LLMs are converging to create a new era of digital ophthalmology. Collectively, these developments portend a future in which conventional ophthalmic knowledge will be seamlessly integrated with AI to improve the patient experience and enhance therapeutic outcomes.

ChatGPT Assisting Diagnosis of Neuro-ophthalmology Diseases Based on Case Reports.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficiency of large language models (LLMs) including ChatGPT to assist in diagnosing neuro-ophthalmic diseases based on case reports. Design: Prospective study. Subjects or Participants: We selected 22 different case reports of neuro-ophthalmic diseases from a publicly available online database. These cases included a wide range of chronic and acute diseases that are commonly seen by neuro-ophthalmic sub-specialists. Methods: We inserted the text from each case as a new prompt into both ChatGPT v3.5 and ChatGPT Plus v4.0 and asked for the most probable diagnosis. We then presented the exact information to two neuro-ophthalmologists and recorded their diagnoses followed by comparison to responses from both versions of ChatGPT. Main Outcome Measures: Diagnostic accuracy in terms of number of correctly diagnosed cases among diagnoses. Results: ChatGPT v3.5, ChatGPT Plus v4.0, and the two neuro-ophthalmologists were correct in 13 (59%), 18 (82%), 19 (86%), and 19 (86%) out of 22 cases, respectively. The agreement between the various diagnostic sources were as follows: ChatGPT v3.5 and ChatGPT Plus v4.0, 13 (59%); ChatGPT v3.5 and the first neuro-ophthalmologist, 12 (55%); ChatGPT v3.5 and the second neuro-ophthalmologist, 12 (55%); ChatGPT Plus v4.0 and the first neuro-ophthalmologist, 17 (77%); ChatGPT Plus v4.0 and the second neuro-ophthalmologist, 16 (73%); and first and second neuro-ophthalmologists 17 (17%). Conclusions: The accuracy of ChatGPT v3.5 and ChatGPT Plus v4.0 in diagnosing patients with neuro-ophthalmic diseases was 59% and 82%, respectively. With further development, ChatGPT Plus v4.0 may have potential to be used in clinical care settings to assist clinicians in providing quick, accurate diagnoses of patients in neuro-ophthalmology. The applicability of using LLMs like ChatGPT in clinical settings that lack access to subspeciality trained neuro-ophthalmologists deserves further research.

The Use of ChatGPT to Assist in Diagnosing Glaucoma Based on Clinical Case Reports.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capabilities of large language models such as Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) to diagnose glaucoma based on specific clinical case descriptions with comparison to the performance of senior ophthalmology resident trainees. METHODS: We selected 11 cases with primary and secondary glaucoma from a publicly accessible online database of case reports. A total of four cases had primary glaucoma including open-angle, juvenile, normal-tension, and angle-closure glaucoma, while seven cases had secondary glaucoma including pseudo-exfoliation, pigment dispersion glaucoma, glaucomatocyclitic crisis, aphakic, neovascular, aqueous misdirection, and inflammatory glaucoma. We input the text of each case detail into ChatGPT and asked for provisional and differential diagnoses. We then presented the details of 11 cases to three senior ophthalmology residents and recorded their provisional and differential diagnoses. We finally evaluated the responses based on the correct diagnoses and evaluated agreements. RESULTS: The provisional diagnosis based on ChatGPT was correct in eight out of 11 (72.7%) cases and three ophthalmology residents were correct in six (54.5%), eight (72.7%), and eight (72.7%) cases, respectively. The agreement between ChatGPT and the first, second, and third ophthalmology residents were 9, 7, and 7, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of ChatGPT in diagnosing patients with primary and secondary glaucoma, using specific case examples, was similar or better than senior ophthalmology residents. With further development, ChatGPT may have the potential to be used in clinical care settings, such as primary care offices, for triaging and in eye care clinical practices to provide objective and quick diagnoses of patients with glaucoma.

Performance of ChatGPT in Diagnosis of Corneal Eye Diseases.

Introduction: Assessing the capabilities of ChatGPT-4.0 and ChatGPT-3.5 for diagnosing corneal eye diseases based on case reports and compare with human experts. Methods: We randomly selected 20 cases of corneal diseases including corneal infections, dystrophies, degenerations, and injuries from a publicly accessible online database from the University of Iowa. We then input the text of each case description into ChatGPT-4.0 and ChatGPT3.5 and asked for a provisional diagnosis. We finally evaluated the responses based on the correct diagnoses then compared with the diagnoses of three cornea specialists (Human experts) and evaluated interobserver agreements. Results: The provisional diagnosis accuracy based on ChatGPT-4.0 was 85% (17 correct out of 20 cases) while the accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5 was 60% (12 correct cases out of 20). The accuracy of three cornea specialists were 100% (20 cases), 90% (18 cases), and 90% (18 cases), respectively. The interobserver agreement between ChatGPT-4.0 and ChatGPT-3.5 was 65% (13 cases) while the interobserver agreement between ChatGPT-4.0 and three cornea specialists were 85% (17 cases), 80% (16 cases), and 75% (15 cases), respectively. However, the interobserver agreement between ChatGPT-3.5 and each of three cornea specialists was 60% (12 cases). Conclusions: The accuracy of ChatGPT-4.0 in diagnosing patients with various corneal conditions was markedly improved than ChatGPT-3.5 and promising for potential clinical integration.

Artificial Intelligence Models for Cell Type and Subtype Identification Based on Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data in Vision Science.

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) provides a high throughput, quantitative and unbiased framework for scientists in many research fields to identify and characterize cell types within heterogeneous cell populations from various tissues. However, scRNA-seq based identification of discrete cell-types is still labor intensive and depends on prior molecular knowledge. Artificial intelligence has provided faster, more accurate, and user-friendly approaches for cell-type identification. In this review, we discuss recent advances in cell-type identification methods using artificial intelligence techniques based on single-cell and single-nucleus RNA sequencing data in vision science. The main purpose of this review paper is to assist vision scientists not only to select suitable datasets for their problems, but also to be aware of the appropriate computational tools to perform their analysis. Developing novel methods for scRNA-seq data analysis remains to be addressed in future studies.

Detecting retinal neural and stromal cell classes and ganglion cell subtypes based on transcriptome data with deep transfer learning.

MOTIVATION: To develop and assess the accuracy of deep learning models that identify different retinal cell types, as well as different retinal ganglion cell (RGC) subtypes, based on patterns of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) in multiple datasets. RESULTS: Deep domain adaptation models were developed and tested using three different datasets. The first dataset included 44 808 single retinal cells from mice (39 cell types) with 24 658 genes, the second dataset included 6225 single RGCs from mice (41 subtypes) with 13 616 genes and the third dataset included 35 699 single RGCs from mice (45 subtypes) with 18 222 genes. We used four loss functions in the learning process to align the source and target distributions, reduce misclassification errors and maximize robustness. Models were evaluated based on classification accuracy and confusion matrix. The accuracy of the model for correctly classifying 39 different retinal cell types in the first dataset was ∼92%. Accuracy in the second and third datasets reached ∼97% and 97% in correctly classifying 40 and 45 different RGCs subtypes, respectively. Across a range of seven different batches in the first dataset, the accuracy of the lead model ranged from 74% to nearly 100%. The lead model provided high accuracy in identifying retinal cell types and RGC subtypes based on scRNA-seq data. The performance was reasonable based on data from different batches as well. The validated model could be readily applied to scRNA-seq data to identify different retinal cell types and subtypes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code and datasets are available on https://github.com/DM2LL/Detecting-Retinal-Cell-Classes-and-Ganglion-Cell-Subtypes. We have also added the class labels of all samples to the datasets. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.