Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials.

This study evaluates the efficacy of capecitabine using data from a large, well-characterised population of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated in two identically designed phase III studies. A total of 1207 patients with previously untreated mCRC were randomised to either oral capecitabine (1250 mg m(-2) twice daily, days 1-14 every 21 days; n=603) or intravenous (i.v.) bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV; Mayo Clinic regimen; n=604). Capecitabine demonstrated a statistically significant superior response rate compared with 5-FU/LV (26 vs 17%; P<0.0002). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that capecitabine consistently resulted in superior response rates (P<0.05), even in patient subgroups with poor prognostic indicators. The median time to response and duration of response were similar and time to progression (TTP) was equivalent in the two arms (hazard ratio (HR) 0.997, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.885-1.123, P=0.95; median 4.6 vs 4.7 months with capecitabine and 5-FU/LV, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified younger age, liver metastases, multiple metastases and poor Karnofsky Performance Status as independent prognostic indicators for poor TTP. Overall survival was equivalent in the two arms (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84-1.06, P=0.48; median 12.9 vs 12.8 months, respectively). Capecitabine results in superior response rate, equivalent TTP and overall survival, an improved safety profile and improved convenience compared with i.v. 5-FU/LV as first-line treatment for MCRC. For patients in whom fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is indicated, capecitabine should be strongly considered. Following encouraging results from phase I and II trials, randomised trials are evaluating capecitabine in combination with irinotecan, oxaliplatin and radiotherapy. Capecitabine is a suitable replacement for i.v. 5-FU as the backbone of colorectal cancer therapy.

Phase I chemotherapy study of biochemical modulation of folinic acid and fluorouracil by gemcitabine in patients with solid tumor malignancies.

PURPOSE: This phase I biochemical modulation study evaluated the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity, and effectiveness of the combination of folinic acid (FA)/fluorouracil (5-FU) followed by escalated dose levels of gemcitabine (FFG) in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were refractory to primary treatment and/or without effective treatment options. Twenty-eight patients received an intravenous (IV) infusion of FA 100 mg/m(2) over 1 hour and a 5-FU 450 mg/m(2) IV bolus in the middle of the FA infusion. After the FA infusion, gemcitabine was administered at a steady rate of infusion of 10 mg/m(2)/min over initially 30 minutes and with increases of an additional 15 minutes at each given level. One cycle consisted of six weekly treatments followed by a 2-week rest. RESULTS: The MTD of gemcitabine was established at 900 mg/m(2) given over 90 minutes. Eight patients of 21 with metastatic colorectal cancer achieved responses (one complete response; seven partial responses), for a response rate of 38%. Responses were seen across the gemcitabine doses of 300 to 900 mg/m(2). One patient had prior treatment with FA/5-FU for advanced disease. Patients with colorectal carcinoma had a median survival of 18 months, and the patient with lung carcinoma has been alive for 24+ months. CONCLUSION: The combination chemotherapy of FFG was well tolerated and may benefit patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. A phase II evaluation in this patient population is in progress.

Therapy for patients with high grade astrocytoma using intraarterial chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: High grade astrocytomas account for approximately 40% of all primary brain tumors. The median survival is approximately 8-10 months for patients with glioblastoma multiforme and 36 months for patients with anaplastic astrocytoma. The results of systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of brain tumors have been reported to be less than satisfactory, mainly because of the blood-brain barrier impermeability for chemotherapeutic drugs. Intraarterial chemotherapy has been an attractive alternative with which to overcome this problem. METHODS: Eighty-three patients with high grade astrocytoma (glioblastoma multiforme [63 patients] and anaplastic astrocytoma--[20 patients]) were treated with intraarterial (intracarotid and/or intravertebral) chemotherapy and radiation therapy between 1987 and 1997. Patients received cisplatin, 60 mg/m2, and etoposide, 40 mg/m2. Radiation therapy was delivered either after completion of the chemotherapy or concomitantly with the chemotherapy. RESULTS: Thirty-four of 71 evaluable patients with high grade astrocytoma (48%) responded to the chemotherapy. The median survival for patients with glioblastoma multiforme who received chemotherapy prior to radiation therapy was 20 months versus 7 months for those patients who underwent concomitant chemotherapy/radiation therapy. Patients with anaplastic astrocytoma who received chemotherapy prior to radiation therapy had a median survival of 45 months compared with 12 months for patients who received concomitant chemotherapy/ radiation therapy. The toxicity profile has been reported to be mild and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Intraarterial chemotherapy for patients with glioblastoma multiforme, delivered prior to radiation therapy, appears to result in a median survival three times longer than that achieved with concomitant chemotherapy/radiation therapy. In addition, patients appear to survive substantially longer than they do after radiation therapy with the addition of systemic chemotherapy. Side effects are reported to be acceptable.

Actual 5-year survival of patients with stage IIIB breast carcinoma: phase II trial of methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, cisplatin, and folinic acid.

Patients with stage IIIB breast carcinoma represent only a small proportion of women with breast cancer in western countries but may constitute up to 50% of cases in underdeveloped countries. The prognosis remains poor despite aggressive treatment. Nineteen patients (11 with inflammatory breast carcinoma) received at least three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy of methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, cisplatin, and folinic acid (MVAC/FA) followed by mastectomy. Six months of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil were given after surgery. Radiation therapy followed chemotherapy. Seventy percent of patients achieved complete and 14% partial response after MVAC/FA chemotherapy alone. Eleven patients (58%) survived 5 years, and 30% survived at least 8 years. The addition of cisplatin in combination chemotherapy used as first-line treatment for stage IIIB breast carcinoma was well tolerated, resulted in higher response rates, and appeared to have an effect on overall survival.

Toxicities related to intraarterial infusion of cisplatin and etoposide in patients with brain tumors.

Chemotherapy for malignant brain tumors has a limited efficacy largely due to restricted blood-brain barrier permeability for chemotherapeutic drugs. Intraarterial chemotherapy (IAC) has the advantage of increased uptake during the first passage of the drugs through tumor capillaries. Initial IAC trials had less than satisfactory results due to unacceptable toxicities. Between 1987 and 1996, 173 patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors were treated with intraarterial (intracarotid and/or intravertebral) cisplatin and etoposide (VP-16). Out of these, 168 patients, who received a total of 438 cycles, were evaluated for the incidence of toxicities. Patients received either cisplatin at 40 mg/m2 and VP-16 at 20 mg/m2 or cisplatin at 60 mg/m2 and VP-16 at 40 mg/m2. Nausea and vomiting were the most common toxicities (42 patients, 14% of cycles). Arterial puncture was associated with a 1.6% incidence of groin hematomas (6 patients), and a 0.7% incidence of failure to canulate the carotid or vertebral arteries (3 patients). Neurologic toxicities included headache (1.4% of cycles, 5 patients), focal seizures (1.4% of cycles, 5 patients), transient confusion and urinary retention/incontinence (1.9% of cycles, 8 patients), and blurred vision (0.9% of cycles, 4 patients). We have not seen visual loss, strokes, major vessel dissection or thrombosis, or myelosuppression. Toxicity incidence was higher in patients with metastatic brain tumors than in those with primary brain tumors (34% versus 17%, p < 0.001). It was also higher in patients who had brain radiation therapy (RT) prior to IAC than in those who had RT concomitant with IAC (31% versus 19%, p = 0.05). No significant difference in toxicity incidence was noticed between patients who received RT concomitant with IAC and those who received RT after IAC (19% and 23% respectively, p = 0.08). Intracarotid chemotherapy given prior to RT resulted in 23 months of median survival for patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Intraarterial chemotherapy with cisplatin and VP-16 is a relatively safe treatment modality, especially in patients with primary brain tumors who have not received brain radiotherapy.

Treatment of metastatic bone pain with tin-117m Stannic diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid: a phase I/II clinical study.

The physical characteristics of Sn-117m combined with the biodistribution of the compound tin-117m (Stannic, 4+) diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Sn-117m DTPA) suggest that it should be an excellent agent for the palliation of pain from bony metastases. Prior work has established the dosimetry and the safety for the material in human beings. The presence of low-energy conversion electrons should result in the relative sparing of the bone marrow while delivering a high radiation dose to sites of bony metastatic disease. Forty-seven patients with painful bone metastases from various malignancies were treated with Sn-117m DTPA. The patients were assigned to five different dose levels ranging from 2.64 to 10.58 MBq (71-286 microCi) per kg of body weight. Follow-up included review of pain diaries, performance scores, analgesic requirements, blood chemistries, and hematological assessment. Three patients received a second treatment. There was an overall response rate for relief of pain of 75% (range, 60-83%) in the 40 treatments that could be evaluated. No correlation was apparent in this limited series between response rate and the five dose levels used. The relief was complete in 12 patients (30%). The time to onset of pain relief was 19 +/- 15 days with doses < or = 5.29 MBq/kg and 5 +/- 3 days with doses > or = 6.61 MBq/kg. Myelotoxicity was minimal, with only one patient having a marginal grade 3 WBC toxicity. On the basis of our data, Sn-117m DTPA should be an effective and safe radiopharmaceutical for palliation of painful bony metastases. A large-scale trial is warranted to evaluate it in comparison to other similar agents.

A Comparison of Oral Ondansetron and Intravenous Granisetron for the Prevention of Nausea and Emesis Associated with Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of oral ondansetron with i.v. granisetron each given as a single dose prior to administration of highly emetogenic cisplatin chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with histologically confirmed malignancies were randomized to receive a single 24 mg ondansetron hydrochloride tablet plus a 50 ml i.v. infusion of normal saline, or a single 10 µg/kg (50 ml) i.v. infusion of granisetron plus a placebo tablet in this multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group trial. Study drug was administered 30 min prior to a single i.v. infusion of cisplatin (50-75 mg/m²), given over a period of

Efficacy and tolerability of oral ondansetron versus prochlorperazine in the prevention of emesis associated with cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy and maintenance of health-related quality of life.

This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of oral ondansetron (8 mg twice daily [BID] for up to 3 days) with those of phenothiazine prochlorperazine (10 mg BID for up to 3 days) in 133 cancer patients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. In addition, the study evaluated the impact of these treatments on patients' health-related quality of life, measured with both the Functional Living Index-Cancer and the Functional Living Index-Emesis questionnaires. The first dose of study drug was administered 30 minutes before initiation of chemotherapy. Patients received a rescue antiemetic at their request or if the investigator deemed it necessary. There was a statistically significant difference in the number of patients with no emetic episodes over the 3-day study period: 60% in the ondansetron group compared with 21% in the prochlorperazine group. Twenty-five percent of ondansetron-treated patients compared with 68% of prochlorperazine-treated patients experienced three or more emetic episodes, rescue medication use, or withdrawal from the study due to emesis or adverse events. Among patients with at least one emetic episode, the mean time to emesis was significantly longer (13 hours and 37 minutes) in the ondansetron group compared with the prochlorperazine group (9 hours and 30 minutes). Nausea and appetite scores did not differ significantly between groups. The score on the vomiting subscale of the Functional Living Index-Emesis was significantly more favorable in the ondansetron group compared with the prochlorperazine group, indicating better maintenance of health-related quality of life in ondansetron-treated patients. Both treatments were well tolerated. The most common potentially drug-related adverse event was headache, which occurred in significantly more (16%) ondansetron-treated patients compared with prochlorperazine-treated patients (3%). The results of this study demonstrate that oral ondansetron 8 mg BID for up to 3 days is more effective than prochlorperazine 10 mg BID for up to 3 days in the prevention of emesis associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Efficacy and tolerability of oral ondansetron versus prochlorperazine in the prevention of emesis associated with cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy and maintenance of health-related quality of life.

This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of oral ondansetron (8 mg twice daily [BID] for up to 3 days) with those of phenothiazine prochlorperazine (10 mg BID for up to 3 days) in 133 cancer patients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. In addition, the study evaluated the impact of these treatments on patients' health-related quality of life, measured with both the Functional Living Index--Cancer and the Functional Living Index--Emesis questionnaires. The first dose of study drug was administered 30 minutes before initiation of chemotherapy. Patients received a rescue antiemetic at their request or if the investigator deemed it necessary. There was a statistically significant difference in the number of patients with no emetic episodes over the 3-day study period: 60% in the ondansetron group compared with 21% in the prochlorperazine group. Twenty-five percent of ondansetron-treated patients compared with 68% of prochlorperazine-treated patients experienced three or more emetic episodes, rescue medication use, or withdrawal from the study due to adverse events or lack of efficacy of the study drug. Among patients with at least one emetic episode, the mean time to emesis was significantly longer (13 hours and 37 minutes) in the ondansetron group compared with the prochlorperazine group (9 hours and 30 minutes). Nausea and appetite scores did not differ significantly between groups. The score on the vomiting subscale of the Functional Living Index--Emesis was significantly more favorable in the ondansetron group compared with the prochlorperazine group, indicating better maintenance of health-related quality of life in ondansetron-treated patients. Both treatments were well tolerated. The most common potentially drug-related adverse event was headache, which occurred in significantly more (16%) ondansetron-treated patients compared with prochlorperazine-treated patients (3%). The results of this study demonstrate that oral ondansetron 8 mg BID for up to 3 days is more effective than prochlorperazine 10 mg BID for up to 3 days in the prevention of emesis associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Preclinical and clinical evaluation of 5-fluorouracil biochemical modulation with folinic acid and hydroxyurea for patients with colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 140,000 new cases of colorectal carcinoma will be diagnosed in 1995 in the United States, and more than one-third of these patients will die from progressive disease. Despite the modest improvement in response rate with chemotherapy, little improvement in patient survival has been noted. Consequently, the evaluation of new agents, modalities, and combinations is needed. METHODS: Two cell lines, HCT 116 and COLO 320 HSR, were treated with various concentrations of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), folinic acid (FA), and hydroxyurea (HU). Subsequently, 41 patients with advanced, measurable metastatic colorectal carcinoma were enrolled in the study. Patients were treated with oral doses of HU (500 mg) every 8 hours on Days 1 and 2, 5-FU (400-500 mg/m2) intravenously Day 2 and FA (100 mg/m2) intravenously on Day 2 of every week for 6 consecutive weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period. All patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 40 were evaluable for response. RESULTS: In both cell lines, the combination of 5-FU/FA/HU consistently produced the best cytotoxic effect. Clinically, the maximum tolerated dose of 5-FU was established at a level of 500 mg/m2 (450 mg/m2 for patients older than 70 years of age). Ten patients experienced Grade 3 or 4 toxicity, consisting mainly of diarrhea. Eleven of 40 evaluable patients responded (three complete responses, eight partial responses), with a median survival of 12+ months and time to progression of 8.5+ months. CONCLUSION: The biochemical modulation of 5-FU with FA and HU were significantly effective in treating patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Overall, this regimen was well tolerated with only moderate toxicity. Further studies incorporating intravenous HU as well as a randomized Phase III study of 5-FU/FA/HU versus 5-FU/FA are recommended.

Oral ondansetron for the control of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis: a large, multicenter, double-blind, randomized comparative trial of ondansetron versus placebo.

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of oral ondansetron in the control of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis in patients who do not require rescue antiemetic therapy for acute emesis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred thirty-eight chemotherapy-naive patients who received cisplatin chemotherapy (> or = 70 mg/m2), and who were not rescued for acute emesis, were eligible to be randomized to receive one of the three oral regimens to control delayed emesis. Group I received placebo on days 2 to 6; group II received ondansetron 8 mg twice daily on days 2 and 3 and placebo on days 4 to 6; group III received ondansetron 8 mg twice daily on days 2 to 6. All patients received intravenous ondansetron (0.15 mg/kg every 4 hours for three doses) for the control of acute emesis on day 1. The number of emetic episodes on days 2 and 3 combined (days 2/3, when incidence and severity of delayed emesis were expected to be greatest) was considered the primary measure of efficacy. RESULTS: Patients who received odansetron had significantly fewer emetic episodes on days 2/3, 4, and 5 than those who received placebo (P < or = .002 on each day). Additionally, significantly more patients who received ondansetron had a complete plus major response (C+MR; < or = two two emetic episodes) than those who received placebo on days 2/3 (56% v 37%, P = .001), 4 (94% v 85%, P = .005), and 5 (98% v 88%, P = .006). Patients who received ondansetron had significantly less nausea on day 2/3 when day-1 nausea was used as the baseline score (P = .025). Patients who received ondansetron also had significantly less nausea on day 4 (P = .042) and the results approached significance on day 5 (P = .066). CONCLUSION: Oral ondansetron had a significant effect in the control of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis and nausea in patients who had not required rescue antiemetics during the acute emesis period. The control of delayed nausea and vomiting was most notable in the immediate 2 days following cisplatin administration, with the clinical difference narrowing between the two treatment arms on subsequent days.

Treatment of cancer-associated hypercalcemia. Double-blind comparison of rapid and slow intravenous infusion regimens of pamidronate disodium and saline alone.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the effects of 60-mg single doses of pamidronate disodium compared with saline alone in the treatment of cancer-associated hypercalcemia. METHODS: After pretreatment hydration, patients with corrected serum calcium concentrations of 3.0 mmol/L (12 mg/dL) or greater secondary to cancer were randomized to double-blind treatment with a single infusion of pamidronate disodium, 60 mg, over either 4 or 24 hours or continued infusions of 0.9% saline alone (n = 23 per group). Corrected serum calcium levels were measured daily for 7 days of inpatient evaluation. RESULTS: Response rates for both of the pamidronate regimens were significantly (P < .05) higher than that for saline alone. A complete response to treatment (corrected serum calcium concentration normalized) was observed for five (22%), 18 (78%), and 14 (61%) patients, respectively, who received saline alone, 4-hour infusion of pamidronate, and 24-hour infusion of pamidronate. There were no significant differences between the two pamidronate regimens. Median durations of complete response were 6, 6, and 11 days, respectively, and median times to relapse (includes complete plus partial responders and nonresponders) were 0, 7, and 7 days, respectively. Pamidronate was well tolerated as assessed by all clinical and laboratory measures, regardless of the time of infusion. CONCLUSIONS: A 4-hour infusion of pamidronate disodium, 60 mg, was as safe and effective as a 24-hour infusion, and both were superior to saline alone in lowering corrected serum calcium concentrations in patients with cancer-associated hypercalcemia.

Alpha interferon, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil (ALF) in advanced cancer: results of a dose-finding study and evidence of activity in non-small cell lung cancer.

In a phase I trial, 17 patients were treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m2 and leucovorin (LV) 500 mg/m2 intravenously weekly for 6 weeks followed by 2 weeks' rest and interferon alfa-2b 1, 3, 5, 8, or 10 million units (MU) subcutaneously tiw with no rest period. The most common toxicities were fatigue (12), diarrhea (10), nausea/vomiting (7), and fever (7). The maximum tolerated interferon dose was 8 MU tiw. Fatigue and increased incidence of other toxicities rather than a single dose-limiting toxicity occurred at the next highest interferon level. ECOG grade III/IV toxicity occurred in 5 patients and included transient supraventricular tachycardia and brief seizure episode (1), dyspnea (1), decreased performance status (1), anemia requiring transfusion (1), and deep vein thrombosis (1). No toxic deaths occurred. Two patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) had partial responses lasting 5 and 4 months. Two other patients with NSCLC had either minor response or stable disease, and 1 patient with colon cancer had a significant decline in serum CEA. The recommended alpha interferon dose is 8 MU tiw when given with this schedule of 5-FU/LV.

Positron emission tomography study of human prostatic adenocarcinoma using carbon-11 putrescine.

To evaluate [1-11C]putrescine ([11C]PUT) as a potential tracer for imaging and characterization of human prostatic adenocarcinoma, positron emission tomography (PET) was performed in eight patients and three normal controls. In addition, four of the patients and the three normal controls also had a prostate scan with 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (18FDG). Three of the patients had undergone resection of the prostate tumor and all of the patients except for one had bone metastasis. Carbon-11 rapidly accumulated in prostate, bone and rectum after injection of [11C]PUT. Maximal uptake was achieved 5 min after injection with minimal washout during the 50 min study period. The uptake of carbon-11 in the prostate of normal controls was significantly higher than that in the patients. However, three of the four patients scanned for metastatic bone lesions showed higher uptake in bone metastasis than in normal bone. Quantitation of 18FDG uptake in the prostate was hindered by the high accumulation of activity in the urinary bladder. [11C]PUT does not appear to be a useful tracer for assessing proliferation of human prostate adenocarcinoma. Its utility in the imaging of other cancers with high polyamine concentration remains to be investigated.

Biodistribution of Sn-117m(4+)DTPA for palliative therapy of painful osseous metastases.

Tin-117 has certain physical characteristics (half-life of 13.6 days, low-energy-conversion electrons, gamma photon of 158.6 keV) that suggest that it may be a favorable agent for radionuclide therapy. It has been shown in animal models that Sn-117m in the chemical form Sn(4+)diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid localizes selectively in bone. The authors therefore studied its whole-body distribution in 10 patients to obtain absorbed dose estimates for therapy. The results showed that more than 50% of the administered activity was absorbed in the bones of patients with metastatic carcinoma. Retention was determined primarily by radioactive decay. For adult men, the radiation absorbed dose estimate averaged 54.8 mGy/MBq (203 rad/mCi) to bone surfaces and 6.1 mGy/MBq (22.6 rad/mCi) to the red marrow. All other tissues received less than 1/10 of the dose received by red marrow. These results suggest that a clinical therapeutic trial should be attempted.

Stratified, randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron administered as a multiple-dose regimen versus two single-dose regimens in the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting.

PURPOSE: This study compares the efficacy and safety of two single-dose regimens with the approved three-dose regimen of ondansetron in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter study was a stratified, randomized, double-blind, and parallel group design. Chemotherapy-naive inpatients were randomized to receive intravenous (IV) ondansetron (Zofran; Glaxo Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC) 0.15 mg/kg times three doses, every 4 hours or a single 8-mg or 32-mg dose followed by two saline doses that began 30 minutes before cisplatin administration. Cisplatin (high-dose > or = 100 mg/m2 or medium-dose 50 to 70 mg/m2) was given as a single infusion (< or = 3 hours). Patients were monitored for emetic episodes, adverse events, and laboratory safety parameters for 24 hours after cisplatin administration. RESULTS: A total of 699 patients (359 high-dose, 340 medium-dose) were enrolled. Of these, 618 were assessable for efficacy (15 ineligible, 66 protocol deviations). The 32-mg dose was superior to the 8-mg single dose with regard to total number of emetic episodes (high-dose, P = .015; medium-dose, P < .001), complete response (no emetic episodes: high-dose, 48% v 35%; P = .048; medium-dose, 73% v 50%; P = .001) and failure rate (> 5 emetic episodes, withdrawn or rescued: high-dose, 20% v 34%; P = .018; medium-dose, 9% v 23%; P = .005). The 32-mg single dose was also superior to the 0.15 mg/kg times three dose regimen with regard to total number of emetic episodes (medium-dose, P = .033) and failure rate (high-dose, 20% v 36%; P = .009; medium-dose, 9% v 22%; P = .011). Ondansetron was well tolerated. The most common adverse event was headache. An approximate 10-fold increase in the incidence of clinically significant transaminase elevations was observed in the high-dose versus medium-dose cisplatin strata (aspartate aminotransferase [AST], 6.5% v 0.7%; serum alanine aminotransferase [ALT], 5.0% v 0.3%). CONCLUSION: A 32-mg single dose of ondansetron is more effective than a single 8-mg dose and is at least as effective as the standard regimen of 0.15 mg/kg times three doses in the prevention of cisplatin-induced acute emesis.

Intracarotid chemotherapy with etoposide and cisplatin for malignant brain tumors.

Chemotherapy for tumors of the central nervous system has a limited efficacy presumably because of restricted blood-brain barrier permeability. The advantage of regional intra-arterial administration of anticancer drugs is an increased uptake during the first passage of the drugs through tumor capillaries. Twenty patients with high-grade astrocytomas (HGA) and 28 patients with metastatic brain tumors (MBT) received intracarotid/intravertebral infusion of etoposide and cisplatin. Eight patients with HGA who underwent incomplete resection responded to chemotherapy alone. Four additional patients had complete resection of the tumor. Median survival time of the group (responders and nonresponders) has been 14 months. Twelve patients with MBT responded to chemotherapy alone (six had complete response [CR], and six had partial response [PR]) with a median survival time of 7 months. Intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) appears to be effective with acceptable toxicities. Accrual of additional patients is required before a final conclusion can be reached.

Randomized phase II evaluation of carboplatin and CHIP in advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

A total of 83 patients with metastatic transitional cell carcinoma who had previously received no systemic therapy entered a randomized phase II evaluation of carboplatin and cis-dichloro-transdihydroxy-bis-isopropylamine platinum IV (CHIP), administered respectively at 400 and 270 mg./m.2 every 28 days. Among evaluable patients with measurable disease response rates were 3 of 22 (14%, 95% confidence interval 5 to 35%) for carboplatin and 4 of 25 (16%, 95% confidence interval 5 to 36%) for CHIP. Among 17 patients with evaluable but not measurable metastases (10 carboplatin and 7 CHIP recipients) there were no responses. Median survival for 64 evaluable patients was 4.8 months (5.0 months for carboplatin and 4.3 months for CHIP recipients). Independent factors prognostic for survival (p less than 0.01) were performance status (0 or 1 versus 2 or 3), liver metastases, prior radiation therapy and recent weight loss (p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis confirmed that a performance status of 2 or 3 and liver metastases were predictive of shorter survival. A total of 31% of the patients treated with carboplatin and 34% of those who received CHIP experienced severe or life-threatening myelosuppression. While the response rates with carboplatin and CHIP are modest, we believe that the characteristics of these agents indicate that they should be evaluated further.

Management of metastases-induced acute pancreatitis in small cell carcinoma of the lung.

Metastases-induced acute pancreatitis is an uncommon condition that has a poor prognosis. Risk factors of acute pancreatitis in known cases have been studied and there is a low survival rate with more than three risk factors on presentation regardless of treatment rendered. These patients should be treated conservatively. Chemotherapy may be attempted in patients with three or fewer poor prognostic signs.