A Qualitative Study Exploring Reproductive Desires and Parenting Attitudes among Ethnically Diverse Teens at Risk of Unintended Pregnancy.

OBJECTIVES: There is minimal research eliciting teen reproductive desires and parenting attitudes. Behavioral, educational, and public health interventions to prevent teen pregnancy often highlight the negative consequences of teen pregnancy or benefits of delaying parenting. However, limited empirical information is available regarding what factors teens perceive to influence the desire to delay pregnancy. In this study, we sought to identify teen perspectives regarding factors that influence their desire to delay parenting. STUDY DESIGN: A consensual qualitative research approach was used to identify reproductive desires, parenting attitudes, and any factors that influence the desire to delay parenting expressed by at risk teens. Forty participants were randomly selected from a larger clinical trial testing the efficacy of a brief, motivational interviewing-based intervention. During the brief intervention, participants were asked about their parenting attitudes and reproductive desires and factors that influence decisions to avoid teen pregnancy. These recorded segments were extracted, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. RESULTS: The study collected qualitative data on overarching key themes regarding teen parenting attitudes and reproductive desires, as well as factors that influence the desire to delay pregnancy, including education, financial stability, partnership, maturity/responsibility, friendships, and family. Many participants indicated that they wanted to delay parenting due to wanting to pursue future goals and/or not feeling ready for the responsibility of children. CONCLUSION: Overall, teens have a variety of reasons for delaying parenting that may not be explicitly captured by the general gain/loss messaging of current interventions. Allowing teens to explore their own beliefs and values around factors that they perceive to influence their desire to delay parenting creates autonomy and places the focus on the teens themselves and not perceived future losses or gains. IMPLICATIONS: This study analyzed the parenting attitudes and reproductive desires of teens undergoing a parenting prevention motivational interviewing intervention. Through a qualitative assessment, this article identifies themes of teen perspectives regarding factors that influence their desire to delay parenting.

Community health worker insights on promoting research engagement with diverse populations.

Representation of diverse populations in health research enhances our ability to understand the factors that impact health, generalize results, implement findings, and promote social justice. The primary objective of the study was to understand the unique perspectives of frontline community health workers (CHWs) to identify actionable barriers and facilitators that may impact representation of diverse groups in health research. Focus groups with CHWs were conducted followed by thematic analysis. Results revealed five main themes: barriers/risks to research participation, facilitation of research, CHW roles, recommendations, and transparency. A novel finding was that some CHWs see themselves as both facilitators and gatekeepers. As facilitators, CHWs ensure their patient populations receive resources and benefit from being involved in research; as gatekeepers CHWs feel that they protect patient populations from experiencing further trauma, especially when engaging in research. Recognizing that in many communities there is a high reliance and trust with CHWs, can promote genuine and informed participation at all stages of research.

Pilot Study of an Overdose First Aid Program in Juvenile Detention.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and short-term impact of a brief opioid overdose prevention and mitigation training administered to detained youth at risk for witnessing an overdose. METHODS: Adolescents seen in the medical clinic in a youth detention center were screened to determine risk for witnessing an overdose. Eligible adolescents completed a pretraining assessment that included opioid witnessing experiences and knowledge of and attitudes toward opioid overdose prevention. Participants completed a one-on-one overdose first aid training, received a naloxone (Narcan) kit at release, and completed a posttraining assessment of knowledge and attitudes. At 1 month and 3 months postrelease, participants completed telephone interviews to report satisfaction and application of training concepts. RESULTS: A total of 39 adolescent residents participated in this pilot study. Rates of recruitment and retention, as well as high rates of witnessing opioid use and overdose, indicate that opioid overdose prevention interventions are warranted with this population. There were significant changes in knowledge, confidence, and readiness to intervene in an opioid overdose from pre- to posttraining. At follow-up, the majority of participants still possessed their naloxone, and all reported sharing information from the training with others and having a plan if they witnessed an overdose. One participant reported completion of an overdose reversal. IMPLICATIONS: Opioid overdose prevention training with detained youth is feasible and shows promising impacts on knowledge and application, meriting the need for future research.