ABSTRACT
Background: Family caregivers of persons living with dementia often experience increased depression and suicidal ideation (SI). However, the feasibility and impact of therapies on caregiver SI has remained largely unexplored. Mentalizing imagery therapy (MIT) helps reduce psychological symptoms through mindfulness and guided imagery. This pilot study examined the feasibility of participation by caregivers with SI in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of MIT versus a psychosocial support group (SG), and the respective impact of group on SI, depression, and secondary outcomes. Methods: A secondary analysis of data from an RCT of 4-week MIT or SG for caregivers (n = 46) was performed, identifying SI (n = 23) and non-SI (n = 23) cohorts. Group attendance and home practice were compared between cohorts. In the SI cohort (total n = 23, MIT n = 11, SG n = 12), group differences in SI, depression, and secondary outcomes were evaluated post-group and at 4-month follow-up. Results: Attendance in both groups and home practice in MIT were similar between SI and non-SI cohorts. In the SI cohort, MIT evinced greater improvements relative to SG in SI (p=.02) and depression (p=.02) post-group, and other secondary outcomes at follow-up. Limitations: Limitations include small sample size and single-item assessments of SI from validated depression rating scales. Conclusions: Participation in an RCT was feasible for caregivers with SI. MIT resulted in important benefits for SI and depression, while SG showed no acute SI benefit. The role of MIT in improving SI should be confirmed with adequately powered trials, as effective therapies to address caregiver SI are critical.
ABSTRACT
Spanish speaking family caregivers of people living with dementia have limited supportive resources in Spanish. There are few validated, culturally acceptable virtual interventions for reducing these caregivers' psychological distress. We investigated the feasibility of a Spanish language adaptation of a virtual Mentalizing Imagery Therapy (MIT) program, which provides guided imagery and mindfulness training to reduce depression, increase mentalizing, and promote well-being. 12 Spanish-speaking family dementia caregivers received a 4-week virtual MIT program. Follow-up was obtained post group and at 4 months post baseline assessment. Feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction with MIT were assessed. The primary psychological outcome was depressive symptoms; secondary outcomes included caregiver burden, dispositional mindfulness, perceived stress, well-being, interpersonal support, and neurological quality of life. Statistical analysis was performed with mixed linear models. Caregivers were 52 ± 8 (mean ± SD) years of age. 60% had a high school education or less. Participation in weekly group meetings was 100%. Home practice was performed on average 4 ± 1 times per week [range 2-5]. Satisfaction with MIT reached 19 ± 2 of a possible 20 points. Reduction in depression from baseline was observed by week three (p = 0.01) and maintained at 4 month follow-up (p = 0.05). There were significant improvements in mindfulness post-group, and in caregiver burden and well-being at 4 months. MIT was successfully adapted for Latino Spanish language family dementia caregivers within a virtual group environment. MIT is feasible and acceptable and may help reduce depressive symptoms and improve subjective well-being. Larger, randomized controlled trials of MIT should determine durability of effects and validate efficacy in this population.
ABSTRACT
During the past 60 years, perceptions about the origins of mental illness have shifted toward a biomedical model, depicting depression as a biological disorder caused by genetic abnormalities and/or chemical imbalances. Despite benevolent intentions to reduce stigma, biogenetic messages promote prognostic pessimism, reduce feelings of agency, and alter treatment preferences, motivations, and expectations. However, no research has examined how these messages influence neural markers of ruminative activity or decision-making, a gap this study sought to fill. In this pre-registered, clinical trial (NCT03998748), 49 participants with current or past depressive experiences completed a sham saliva test and were randomly assigned to receive feedback that they either have (gene-present; n = 24) or do not have (gene-absent; n = 25) a genetic predisposition to depression. Before and after receiving the feedback, resting-state activity and neural correlates of cognitive control (error-related negativity [ERN] and error positivity [Pe]) were measured using high-density electroencephalogram (EEG). Participants also completed self-report measures of beliefs about the malleability and prognosis of depression and treatment motivation. Contrary to hypotheses, biogenetic feedback did not alter perceptions or beliefs about depression, nor did it alter EEG markers of self-directed rumination nor neurophysiological correlates of cognitive control. Explanations of these null findings are discussed in the context of prior studies.
