Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 76
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38553279
2.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 17(2): e013502, 2024 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38348649

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Improved radiation safety practices are needed across hospitals performing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study was performed to assess the temporal trend in PCI radiation doses concurrent with the conduct of a statewide radiation safety initiative. METHODS: A statewide initiative to reduce PCI radiation doses was conducted in Michigan between 2017 and 2021 and included focused radiation safety education, reporting of institutional radiation doses, and implementation of radiation performance metrics for hospitals. Using data from a large statewide registry, PCI discharges between July 1, 2016, and July 1, 2022, having a procedural air kerma (AK) recorded were analyzed for temporal trends. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine whether declines in procedural AK over time were attributable to changes in known predictors of radiation doses. RESULTS: Among 131 619 PCI procedures performed during the study period, a reduction in procedural AK was observed over time, from a median dose of 1.46 (0.86-2.37) Gy in the first year of the study to 0.97 (0.56-1.64) Gy in the last year of the study (P<0.001). The proportion of cases with an AK ≥5 Gy declined from 4.24% to 0.86% over the same time period (P<0.0001). After adjusting for variables known to impact radiation doses, a 1-year increase in the date of PCI was associated with a 7.61% (95% CI, 7.38%-7.84%) reduction in procedural AK (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent with the conduct of a statewide initiative to reduce procedural radiation doses, a progressive and significant decline in procedural radiation doses was observed among patients undergoing PCI in the state of Michigan.


Subject(s)
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Humans , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Radiation Dosage , Treatment Outcome , Michigan , Time Factors , Coronary Angiography
3.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 11544, 2023 07 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37460602

ABSTRACT

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can rarely arise from non-lipid-rich coronary plaques. This study sought to compare the clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between AMI showing maximum lipid-core burden index in 4 mm (maxLCBI4mm) < 400 and ≥ 400 in the infarct-related lesions assessed by near-infrared spectroscopy-intravascular ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS). We investigated 426 AMI patients who underwent NIRS-IVUS in the infarct-related lesions before PCI. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as the composite of cardiac death, non-fatal MI, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), clinically driven non-TLR, and congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization. 107 (25%) patients had infarct-related lesions of maxLCBI4mm < 400, and 319 (75%) patients had those of maxLCBI4mm ≥ 400. The maxLCBI4mm < 400 group had a younger median age at onset (68 years [IQR: 57-78 years] vs. 73 years [IQR: 64-80 years], P = 0.007), less frequent multivessel disease (39% vs. 51%, P = 0.029), less frequent TIMI flow grade 0 or 1 before PCI (62% vs. 75%, P = 0.007), and less frequent no-reflow immediately after PCI (5% vs. 11%, P = 0.039). During a median follow-up period of 31 months [IQR: 19-48 months], the frequency of MACE was significantly lower in the maxLCBI4mm < 400 group compared with the maxLCBI4mm ≥ 400 group (4.7% vs. 17.2%, P = 0.001). MaxLCBI4mm < 400 was an independent predictor of MACE-free survival at multivariable analysis (hazard ratio: 0.36 [confidence interval: 0.13-0.98], P = 0.046). MaxLCBI4mm < 400 measured by NIRS in the infract-related lesions before PCI was associated with better long-term clinical outcomes in AMI patients.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Plaque, Atherosclerotic , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging
4.
Interv Cardiol Clin ; 12(2): 257-268, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36922066

ABSTRACT

Intracoronary near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) has been extensively validated against the gold standard of histopathology to identify lipid-rich plaque. NIRS is currently in clinical use as a combined multimodality imaging catheter with intravascular ultrasonography. When used before PCI, NIRS has clinical utility in determining the mechanism underlying acute coronary syndromes and can be used to guide stent length selection and identify the risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction. When used after PCI, NIRS can identify vulnerable patients at increased risk of future patient-level cardiovascular events and can detect vulnerable plaques at increased risk of future site-specific coronary events.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Plaque, Atherosclerotic , Humans , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared/methods , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/diagnostic imaging , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/surgery
5.
J Card Fail ; 29(4): 473-478, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36195201

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cardiologists performing coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at risk of health problems related to chronic occupational radiation exposure. Unlike during CA and PCI, physician radiation exposure during right heart catheterization (RHC) and endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) has not been adequately studied. The objective of this study was to assess physicians' radiation doses during RHC with and without EMB and compare them to those of CA and PCI. METHODS: Procedural head-level physician radiation doses were collected by real-time dosimeters. Radiation-dose metrics (fluoroscopy time, air kerma [AK] and dose area product [DAP]), and physician-level radiation doses were compared among RHC, RHC with EMB, CA, and PCI. RESULTS: Included in the study were 351 cardiac catheterization procedures. Of these, 36 (10.3%) were RHC, 42 (12%) RHC with EMB, 156 (44.4%) CA, and 117 (33.3%) PCI. RHC with EMB and CA had similar fluoroscopy time. AK and DAP were progressively higher for RHC, RHC with EMB, CA, and PCI. Head-level physician radiation doses were similar for RHC with EMB vs CA (P = 0.07). When physicians' radiation doses were normalized to DAP, RHC and RHC with EMB had the highest doses. CONCLUSION: Physicians' head-level radiation doses during RHC with EMB were similar to those of CA. After normalizing to DAP, RHC and RHC with EMB were associated with significantly higher physician radiation doses than CA or PCI. These observations suggest that additional protective measures should be undertaken to decrease physicians' radiation exposure during RHC and, in particular, RHC with EMB.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Physicians , Radiation Exposure , Humans , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure/adverse effects , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Biopsy/adverse effects , Coronary Angiography/adverse effects
6.
Interv Cardiol ; 18: e30, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38213745

ABSTRACT

Since the first robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention procedure (R-PCI) was performed in 2004, there has been a steady evolution in robotic technology, combined with a growth in the number of robotic installations worldwide and operator experience. This review summarises the latest developments in R-PCI with a focus on developments in robotic technology, procedural complexity, tele-stenting and training methods, which have all contributed to the global expansion in R-PCI.

7.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 15(10): e012182, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36256694

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary imaging (ICI) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves outcomes, yet hospital- and physician-level variabilities in ICI and its impact on ICI use in contemporary PCI remain unknown. This study was performed to evaluate hospital- and physician-level use of ICI to optimize PCI. METHODS: Using data from a large statewide registry, patients undergoing PCI between July 2019 and March 2021 were studied. The primary measure of interest was ICI (intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography) optimization during PCI. A fitted hierarchical Bayesian model identified variables independently associated with ICI optimization. The performing hospital and physician were included as random effects in the model. RESULTS: Among 48 872 PCIs, ICI optimization was performed in 8094 (16.6%). Median [interquartile range] hospital- and physician-level frequencies of ICI were 8.8% [3.1%, 16.0%] and 6.1% [1.1%, 25.0%], respectively. Bayesian modeling identified left main PCI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.41; 95% credible interval [3.82, 5.10]), proximal left anterior descending artery PCI (aOR, 2.28 [2.00, 2.59]), PCI for in-stent restenosis (aOR, 1.55 [1.40, 1.72]), and surgical consult prior to PCI (aOR, 1.21 [1.07, 1.37]) as independent predictors of ICI optimization. The hospital-level median odds ratio, an estimate of the contribution of inter-hospital variability in odds of ICI use, was 3.48 (2.64, 5.04). Physician-level median odds ratio was 3.81 (3.33, 4.45). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial hospital- and physician-level variation in ICI was observed. Except for performance of left main PCI, the hospital and physician performing the PCI were more strongly associated with ICI optimization than any patient or procedural factors.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Humans , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Bayes Theorem , Treatment Outcome , Registries
8.
PLoS One ; 17(9): e0273638, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36156591

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted healthcare delivery and patient outcomes globally. AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the temporal trends and outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Michigan. METHODS: We compared all patients undergoing PCI in the BMC2 Registry between March and December 2020 ("pandemic cohort") with those undergoing PCI between March and December 2019 ("pre-pandemic cohort"). A risk-adjusted analysis of in-hospital outcomes was performed between the pre-pandemic and pandemic cohort. A subgroup analysis was performed comparing COVID-19 positive vs. negative patients during the pandemic. RESULTS: There was a 15.2% reduction in overall PCI volume from the pre-pandemic (n = 25,737) to the pandemic cohort (n = 21,822), which was more pronounced for stable angina and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS) presentations, and between February and May 2020. Patients in the two cohorts had similar clinical and procedural characteristics. Monthly mortality rates for primary PCI were generally higher in the pandemic period. There were no significant system delays in care between the cohorts. Risk-adjusted mortality was higher in the pandemic cohort (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.07-1.47, p = 0.005), a finding that was only partially explained by worse outcomes in COVID-19 patients and was more pronounced in subjects with ACS. During the pandemic, COVID-19 positive patients suffered higher risk-adjusted mortality (aOR 5.69, 95% CI 2.54-12.74, p<0.001) compared with COVID negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, we observed a reduction in PCI volumes and higher risk-adjusted mortality. COVID-19 positive patients experienced significantly worse outcomes.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , COVID-19 , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Michigan/epidemiology , Pandemics , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Registries , Treatment Outcome
9.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(7): e2220597, 2022 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35797046

ABSTRACT

Importance: Transesophageal echocardiography during percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAO) and transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER) require an interventional echocardiographer to stand near the radiation source and patient, the primary source of scatter radiation. Despite previous work demonstrating high radiation exposure for interventional cardiologists performing percutaneous coronary and structural heart interventions, similar data for interventional echocardiographers are lacking. Objective: To assess whether interventional echocardiographers are exposed to greater radiation doses than interventional cardiologists and sonographers during structural heart procedures. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this single-center cross-sectional study, radiation doses were collected from interventional echocardiographers, interventional cardiologists, and sonographers at a quaternary care center during 30 sequential LAAO and 30 sequential TEER procedures from July 1, 2016, to January 31, 2018. Participants and study personnel were blinded to radiation doses through data analysis (January 1, 2020, to October 12, 2021). Exposures: Occupation defined as interventional echocardiographers, interventional cardiologists, and sonographers. Main Outcomes and Measures: Measured personal dose equivalents per case were recorded using real-time radiation dosimeters. Results: A total of 60 (30 TEER and 30 LAAO) procedures were performed in 60 patients (mean [SD] age, 79 [8] years; 32 [53.3%] male) with a high cardiovascular risk factor burden. The median radiation dose per case was higher for interventional echocardiographers (10.6 µSv; IQR, 4.2-22.4 µSv) than for interventional cardiologists (2.1 µSv; IQR, 0.2-8.3 µSv; P < .001). During TEER, interventional echocardiographers received a median radiation dose of 10.5 µSv (IQR, 3.1-20.5 µSv), which was higher than the median radiation dose received by interventional cardiologists (0.9 µSv; IQR, 0.1-12.2 µSv; P < .001). During LAAO procedures, the median radiation dose was 10.6 µSv (IQR, 5.8-24.1 µSv) among interventional echocardiographers and 3.5 (IQR, 1.3-6.3 µSv) among interventional cardiologists (P < .001). Compared with interventional echocardiographers, sonographers exhibited low median radiation doses during both LAAO (0.2 µSv; IQR, 0.0-1.6 µSv; P < .001) and TEER (0.0 µSv; IQR, 0.0-0.1 µSv; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, interventional echocardiographers were exposed to higher radiation doses than interventional cardiologists during LAAO and TEER procedures, whereas sonographers demonstrated comparatively lower radiation doses. Higher radiation doses indicate a previously underappreciated occupational risk faced by interventional echocardiographers, which has implications for the rapidly expanding structural heart team.


Subject(s)
Cardiologists , Occupational Exposure , Radiation Exposure , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Dosage
10.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 100(2): 207-213, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35621166

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of robotic diagnostic coronary angiography. BACKGROUND: Robotic percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with marked reductions in physician radiation exposure. Development of robotic diagnostic coronary angiography might similarly impact occupational safety. METHODS: Stable patients referred for coronary angiography were prospectively enrolled. After obtaining vascular access, diagnostic catheters were manually advanced over a wire to the ascending aorta. All subsequent catheter movements were performed robotically. The primary endpoint was procedural success, defined as robotic completion of coronary angiography without conversion to a manual procedure and the absence of procedural major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE-cardiac death, cardiac arrest, or stroke) and major angiographic complications (coronary/aortic dissection or embolization). The primary hypothesis was that the observed rate of the primary endpoint, evaluated at the completion of coronary angiography, would meet a pre-specified performance goal of 74.5%. RESULTS: Among 46 consecutive patients (age 67 ± 12 years; 69.6% male), diagnostic coronary angiography was completed robotically in all cases without the need for manual conversion and without any MACE or major angiographic complications. Thus, procedural success was 100%, which was significantly higher than the pre-specified performance goal (p < 0.001). Robotic coronary angiography was completed using 2 [2, 3] catheters per case with a median procedural time of 15 [11, 20] minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic diagnostic coronary angiography was performed with 100% procedural success and no observed complications. These results support the performance of future studies to further explore robotic coronary angiography.


Subject(s)
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Robotics , Aged , Coronary Angiography/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Stents , Treatment Outcome
12.
Am J Cardiol ; 169: 18-23, 2022 04 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35045930

ABSTRACT

Fewer ST-elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs) presentations and increased delays in care occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic in urban areas. Whether these associations occurred in a more rural population has not been previously reported. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on time-to-presentation for STEMI in rural locations. Patients presenting to a large STEMI network spanning 27 facilities and 13 predominantly rural counties between January 1, 2016 and April 30, 2020 were included. Presentation delays, defined as time from symptom onset to arrival at the first medical facility, classified as ≥12 and ≥24 hours from symptom onset were compared among patients in the pre-COVID-19 and the early COVID-19 eras. To account for patient-level differences, 2:1 propensity score matching was performed using binary logistic regression. Among 1,286 patients with STEMI, 1,245 patients presented in the pre-COVID-19 era and 41 presented during the early COVID-19 era. Presentation delays ≥12 hours (19.5% vs 4.0%) and ≥24 hours (14.6% and 0.2%) were more common in COVID-19 than pre-COVID-19 cohorts (p <0.001 for both), despite a low COVID-19 prevalence. Similar results were seen in propensity-matched comparisons (≥12 hours: 19.5% vs 2.4%, p = 0.002; ≥24 hours 14.6% vs 0.0%, p = 0.001). In a predominantly rural STEMI population, delays in seeking medical care after symptom onset were markedly more frequent during the COVID-19 era, despite low COVID-19 prevalence. Considering delays in reperfusion have multiple adverse downstream consequences, these findings may have important implications in rural communities during future pandemic resurgences.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Pandemics , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Prevalence , Rural Population , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology
13.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 99(4): 981-988, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34967086

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to evaluate physician radiation doses with the use of a suspended lead suit. BACKGROUND: Interventional cardiologists face substantial occupational risks from chronic radiation exposure and wearing heavy lead aprons. METHODS: Head-level physician radiation doses, collected using real-time dosimeters during consecutive coronary angiography procedures, were compared with the use of a suspended lead suit versus conventional lead aprons. Multiple linear regression analyses were completed using physician radiation doses as the response and testing patient variables (body mass index, age, sex), procedural variables (right heart catheterization, fractional flow reserve, percutaneous coronary intervention, radial access), and shielding variables (radiation-absorbing pad, accessory lead shield, suspended lead suit) as the predictors. RESULTS: Among 1054 coronary angiography procedures, 691 (65.6%) were performed with a suspended lead suit and 363 (34.4%) with lead aprons. There was no significant difference in dose area product between groups (61.7 [41.0, 94.9] mGy·cm2 vs. 64.6 [42.9, 96.9] mGy·cm2 , p = 0.20). Median head-level physician radiation doses were 10.2 [3.2, 35.5] µSv with lead aprons and 0.2 [0.1, 0.9] µSv with a suspended lead suit (p < 0.001), representing a 98.0% reduced dose with suspended lead. In the fully adjusted regression model, the use of a suspended lead suit was independently associated with a 93.8% reduction (95% confidence interval: -95.0, -92.3; p < 0.001) in physician radiation dose. CONCLUSION: Compared to conventional lead aprons, the use of a suspended lead suit during coronary angiography was associated with marked reductions in head-level physician radiation doses.


Subject(s)
Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial , Occupational Exposure , Physicians , Radiation Exposure , Coronary Angiography/adverse effects , Coronary Angiography/methods , Humans , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure/adverse effects , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiography, Interventional/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
14.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 36: 51-55, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34052128

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This pre-clinical study evaluated the efficacy of a novel shielding system to reduce scatter radiation in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. METHODS: Using a scatter radiation phantom in a standard cardiac catheterization laboratory, a radiation physicist recorded radiation measurements at 20 reference points on the operator side of the table. Measurements were made with fluoroscopy and cine with the C-arm in the posterior-anterior (PA) and 40 degrees left anterior oblique (LAO) orientations. Scatter radiation doses were compared with and without use of the shielding system. RESULTS: Use of the shielding system was associated with >94.2% reduction in scatter radiation across all reference points in the PA and LAO projections with fluoroscopy and cine. With the shielding system, dose reductions at the location of the primary operator ranged from 97.8% to 99.8%. At locations of maximum scatter radiation, use of the shielding system resulted in dose reductions ranging from 97.8% to 99.8% with fluoroscopy and from 97.9% to 99.8% with cine. CONCLUSIONS: In this pre-clinical study, a novel radiation shielding system was observed to dramatically reduce scatter radiation doses. Based on these results, clinical testing is warranted to determine whether the shielding system will enable operators and staff to perform interventional procedures with less radiation exposure that may obviate the need to wear standard lead apparel. INDEXING WORDS: Radiation safety; occupational health; occupational hazard.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure , Radiation Exposure , Radiation Protection , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Fluoroscopy/adverse effects , Fluoroscopy/methods , Humans , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure/adverse effects , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiography, Interventional/adverse effects
16.
BMJ Neurol Open ; 3(1): e000141, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34263168

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In acute ischaemic stroke, endovascular thrombectomy (ET) significantly reduces disability compared with thrombolytic therapy, but access to ET is currently limited. Leveraging telerobotic technology to disseminate neurosurgical expertise could increase access to ET. This proof-of-concept evaluation was performed to determine whether remote robotic ET (RRET), wherein an offsite neurosurgeon and an onsite interventional cardiologist collaboratively use telerobotics to perform ET, is technically feasible. METHODS: An ex vivo model of RRET was constructed by establishing a network connection between a robotic drive in a simulation laboratory and a robotic control unit 5 miles away. Using onsite assistance from an interventional cardiologist in the simulation laboratory, an offsite neurosurgeon used the robotic controls to attempt RRET on a fluid-filled silicone model of human vasculature containing simulated thrombus material in the left middle cerebral artery (MCA). RESULTS: From the offsite location 5 miles away, the neurosurgeon used the robotic system to successfully navigate a guidewire from the carotid artery to simulated thrombus in the MCA. Under the direction of the neurosurgeon, the onsite interventional cardiologist then successfully manually advanced an aspiration catheter over the guidewire to the thrombus, removed the guidewire and performed aspiration. CONCLUSIONS: In this proof-of-concept evaluation, the technical feasibility of RRET was demonstrated in an ex vivo model and was collaboratively performed by an offsite neurosurgeon and an onsite interventional cardiologist. This report supports the design of future studies to determine if RRET could be used to increase access to ET for patients with acute ischaemic stroke.

17.
Am J Cardiol ; 155: 9-15, 2021 09 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34325106

ABSTRACT

Potent antithrombotic agents are routinely prescribed after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to reduce ischemic complications. However, in patients who are at an increased bleeding risk, this may pose significant risks. We sought to evaluate the association between a history of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and outcomes after PCI. We linked clinical registry data from PCIs performed at 48 Michigan hospitals between 1/2013 and 3/2018 to Medicare claims. We used 1:5 propensity score matching to adjust for patient characteristics. In-hospital outcomes included bleeding, transfusion, stroke or death. Post-discharge outcomes included 90-day all-cause readmission and long-term mortality. Of 30,206 patients, 1.1% had a history of GIB. Patients with a history of GIB were more likely to be older, female, and have more cardiovascular comorbidities. After matching, those with a history of GIB (n = 312) had increased post-procedural transfusions (15.7% vs 8.4%; p < 0.001), bleeding (11.9% vs 5.2%; p < 0.001), and major bleeding (2.8% vs 0.6%; p = 0.004). Ninety-day readmission rates were similar among those with and without a history of GIB (34.3% vs 31.3%; p = 0.318). There was no significant difference in post-discharge survival (1 year: 78% vs 80%; p = 0.217; 5 years: 54% vs 51%; p = 0.189). In conclusion, after adjusting for baseline characteristics, patients with a history of GIB had increased risk of post-PCI in-hospital bleeding complications. However, a history of GIB was not significantly associated with 90-day readmission or long-term survival.


Subject(s)
Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/complications , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Registries , Aged , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Michigan/epidemiology , Patient Discharge/trends , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends
18.
EuroIntervention ; 17(12): e999-e1006, 2021 Dec 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34105512

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Successful restoration of epicardial coronary artery patency by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) does not always lead to adequate reperfusion at the microvascular level. AIMS: This study sought to investigate the association between lipid-rich coronary plaque identified by near-infrared spectroscopy combined with intravascular ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) and microvascular obstruction (MVO) detected by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after PPCI for STEMI. METHODS: We investigated 120 patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI. NIRS-IVUS was used to measure the maximum lipid core burden index in 4 mm (maxLCBI4 mm) in the infarct-related lesions before PPCI. Delayed contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI was performed to evaluate MVO one week after PPCI. RESULTS: MVO was identified in 40 (33%) patients. MaxLCBI4 mm in the infarct-related lesion was significantly larger in the MVO group compared with the no-MVO group (median [interquartile range]: 745 [522-853] vs 515 [349-698], p<0.001). A multivariable logistic regression model showed that maxLCBI4 mm was an independent predictor of MVO (odds ratio: 24.7 [95% confidence interval: 2.5-248.0], p=0.006). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that maxLCBI4 mm >600 was the optimal cut-off value to predict MVO (Youden index=0.44 and area under the curve=0.71) with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 69%. CONCLUSIONS: Lipid content measured by NIRS in the infarct-related lesions was associated with the occurrence of MVO after PPCI in STEMI.


Subject(s)
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared , Humans , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...