Infrasellar Nasopharyngeal Craniopharyngiomas: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Craniopharyngiomas are benign tumors of the anterior skull base arising from epithelial remnants of Rathke pouch. They mainly occur in the suprasellar space, can be incredibly debilitating, and remain difficult to resect as they frequently involve critical neurovascular structures. Although it is embryologically possible for craniopharyngiomas to arise extracranially along the entire migrational path of Rathke pouch, these remain exceedingly rare, especially among adults, and can be mistaken for nasopharyngeal cancer. As such, minimal data exist evaluating the management and outcomes of such lesions. We evaluated our institutional experience with purely infrasellar nasopharyngeal craniopharyngiomas and obtained individual patient data reported in the contemporary literature to better characterize the demographics, presentation, surgical management, and long-term outcomes of these lesions. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify previously published cases of purely infrasellar nasopharyngeal craniopharyngioma in 3 electronic databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and Scopus. Search terms were "infrasellar craniopharyngioma" and "nasopharyngeal craniopharyngioma." RESULTS: We identified 25 cases, in which 72% of patients presented with symptoms of nasal obstruction, epistaxis, or headache. An endoscopic approach was performed in 40% of cases; 83.3% of all patients had gross total resection, with 60% having no recurrence at a median follow-up of 13 months. No postoperative complications were reported. Tumor location involving the cavernous sinus was associated with incomplete resection (100%) compared with tumors not involving the cavernous sinus (87%) (P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: While uncommon, infrasellar nasopharyngeal craniopharyngiomas appear to have better perioperative and long-term surgical outcomes than their suprasellar counterparts.

Influence of instrumentation type on outcomes after surgical management of spondylodiscitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Spondylodiscitis refers to infection of the intervertebral disk and neighboring structures. Outcomes based on instrumentation type are not well reported in the literature, but are important in establishing guidelines for surgical management of spondylodiscitis. This study aims to clarify the effect of instrumentation material selection on clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with spondylodiscitis. METHODS: Studies that evaluated the use of polyetheretherketone (PEEK), titanium, allograft, and/or autologous bone grafts for spondylodiscitis were identified in the literature. Radiographic and clinical data were analyzed using a meta-analysis of proportions, with estimated risk and confidence intervals reported for our primary study outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-two retrospective studies totaling 1088 patients undergoing surgical management of spondylodiscitis with PEEK, TTN, allograft, and autologous bone graft instrumentation were included. There were no differences in fusion rates (p-interaction = 0.55) with rates of fusion of 93.4% with TTN, 98.6% with allograft, 84.2% with autologous bone graft, and 93.9% with PEEK. There were no differences in screw loosening (p-interaction = 0.52) with rates of 0.33% with TTN, 0% with allograft, 1.3% with autologous bone graft, and 8.2% with PEEK. There were no differences in reoperation (p-interaction = 0.59) with rates of 2.64% with TTN, 0% with allograft, 1.69% with autologous bone graft, and 3.3% with PEEK. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates that the choice of instrumentation type in the surgical management of spondylodiscitis resulted in no significant differences in rate of radiographic fusion, screw loosening, or reoperation. Future comparative studies to optimize guidelines for the management of spondylodiscitis are needed.