Ventricular tachycardia induced by pacing algorithm designed to avoid atrial fibrillation.

A patient with a dual chamber pacemaker was admitted to the emergency room after out-of-hospital cardioversion for syncopal sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Device interrogation revealed an abnormally timed ventricular spike after a ventricular premature beat at the beginning of the event, caused by a pacemaker algorithm designed to avoid atrial fibrillation, non-competitive atrial pacing. Despite the absence of significant coronary lesions, in the setting of a vulnerable substrate - a hypokinetic and hyperechogenic region of ventricular myocardium - an upgrade to a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was performed, and substrate ablation was planned.

Implantation of a Dual-Chamber Pacemaker in a Patient with Situs Inversus and Dextrocardia using a Novel Ultrasound Technique.

We report a case of a 43-year-old man with situs inversus and dextrocardia who was admitted with syncope in the setting of complete atrioventricular block. The complex anatomy poses a considerable challenge to transvenous permanent pacemaker implantation. We employed a novel technique using vascular ultrasound and agitated saline solution to assist with lead positioning. This technique could be useful in pediatric populations or younger patients, in whom the use of ionizing radiation is an important issue.

Utility of Pacemaker With Sleep Apnea Monitor to Predict Left Ventricular Overload and Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.

Pacemakers with sleep apnea monitor (SAM) provide an easy tool to assess obstructive sleep apnea over long periods of time. The link between respiratory disturbances at night and the incidence of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is not well established. We aimed at (1) determining the ability of SAM pacemakers to evaluate the extent of left ventricular overload and (2) assess the impact of respiratory disturbances at night on the occurrence of ADHF over 1-year of follow-up. We conducted a single-center prospective study. Consecutive patients with SAM pacemakers were comprehensively assessed. SAM automatically computes a respiratory disturbance index (RDI, apneas/hypopneas per hour - AH/h) in the previous night and the percentage of nights with RDI >20 AH/h in the previous 6 months. Thirty-seven patients were included (79.3 ± 11.2 years, 46% males). A high RDI in the previous night and a higher %nights with increased RDI were associated with increased NT-proBNP values (p = 0.008 and p = 0.013, respectively) and were the sole predictors of increased noninvasive pulmonary capillary wedge pressures (PCWP) in the morning of assessment (p = 0.031 and p = 0.044, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.804 (95% confidence interval 0.656 to 0.953, p = 0.002) for %nights with RDI >20 AH/h in the prediction of high PCWP. Patients with >12.5% of nights with RDI >20AH/h tended to have more ADHF during follow-up (log-rank p = 0.067). In conclusion, a high burden of apneas/hypopneas at night is associated with elevated NT-proBNP and PCWP values and an increased risk of ADHF over 1 year. These patients might benefit from early tailored clinical management.

An inappropriate defibrillator shock during ventricular tachycardia.

Ventricular oversensing in patients with defibrillators is an infrequent but deleterious condition. We report a patient with a cardiac resynchronization-defibrillation device that presented with hyperkalemia and syncope. Device interrogation revealed ventricular double-counting within the QRS of a slow ventricular tachycardia, resulting detection of the slow ventricular tachycardia in the ventricular fibrillation zone, and delivery of an effective therapy, below device programmed detection rate. This case of defibrillator inappropriate detection emphasizes the relevance of device electrogram interrogation in order to minimize inappropriate therapies.

National registry on cardiac electrophysiology (2012).

Based on a survey sent to Portuguese centers that perform diagnostic and interventional electrophysiology and/or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantations, the authors analyze the number and type of procedures performed during 2012 and compare these data with previous years. In 2012, a total of 2561 diagnostic electrophysiologic studies were performed, which were followed by ablation in 2017 cases, representing a steady situation compared with the previous year. There was a 12% increase in the number of ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation, making it for the first time the most frequent indication for ablation, overtaking atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. The total number of first ICD implantations was 1048 (around 100 per million population), of which 375 were cardiac resynchronization devices (BiV ICDs). This represents a slight decrease (3.3%) in the total number of new implants, with an increase of 10% in the number of BiV ICDs compared to the previous year. However, there was a considerable increase in the number of ICD generator replacements, resulting in an overall increase of 3.5% in implantations performed in 2012. Some comments are made regarding developments in this activity and its current status, and on some factors that may influence the dynamics of this area of interventional cardiology.

[National registry on cardiac electrophysiology (2010 and 2011)]. / Registo Nacional de Eletrofisiologia Cardíaca (2010 e 2011).

Based on a survey sent to Portuguese centers that perform diagnostic and interventional electrophysiology and/or implant cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), the authors analyze the number and type of procedures performed during 2010 and 2011 and compare these data with previous years. In 2011, a total of 2533 diagnostic electrophysiologic procedures were performed, which were followed by ablation in 2013 cases, a steady increase over previous years. The largest share of this increase compared to 2010 was in atrial fibrillation, which is now the second most frequent indication for ablation, after atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. The total number of ICDs implanted in 2011 was 1084, of which 339 were biventricular (BiV) cardiac resynchronization devices (BiV ICDs). This represents an increase in the total number relative to previous years, 2011 being the first year in which the rate of new ICD implantations in Portugal exceeded 100 per million population. However, compared to 2010, the number of BiV ICDs implanted decreased, despite the recent publication of updated European guidelines on device therapy in heart failure, which clarified and expanded the indications for implantation of these devices. Some comments are made on the current status of cardiac electrophysiology in Portugal and on factors that may influence its development in the coming years.

RIVER: Portuguese registry to monitor unnecessary right ventricular pacing.

The aim of this prospective registry is to evaluate a new algorithm designed to reduce the percentage of unnecessary ventricular pacing (%VP) in patients implanted with a dual-chamber pacemaker, through a dedicated pacing mode (called AAISafeR2) operating in AAI mode with back-up ventricular pacing in DDD mode, and to describe the incidence and distribution of atrioventricular (AV) block in this population. Investigators were free to assign patients to AAISafeR2 mode or to standard DDD (if AAISafeR was contraindicated, mainly due to permanent high-degree AV block). Patients underwent routine follow-up visits at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after implantation. At each follow-up visit, data were retrieved from pacemaker memories and analyzed to extract %VP and incidence of AV block. Up to December 2006, 158 patients (94 men, mean age 69 +/- 14 years) from nine Portuguese centers had been consecutively included. We also determined the distribution of AV block (according to the criteria used by the pacemaker to classify AV block and switch to DDD mode). AAISafeR was shown to be effective in reducing unnecessary VP in our patient population. The analysis also reveals a high incidence of paroxysmal AV block, often unknown at the time of implantation. There were no complications associated with AAISafeR programming.

ICD defibrillation failure solved in an unusual fashion.

An implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is designed to sense life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and terminate them, either by rapid pacing or by delivering an electrical shock. Nowadays it is a proven therapy for both primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. The typical configuration of an ICD consists of a right ventricular sensing/defibrillator lead with two coils (one distal, located in the right ventricle, and one proximal, located at the superior vena cava-right atrium junction) and an active can, the so-called "ventricular triad". Although effective in the vast majority of patients, it could be argued that this is not the most rational arrangement in electrical terms, since the main shock vector is anteriorly displaced in relation to the greater portion of the left ventricular mass. We describe a case of an ICD defibrillation failure that was solved by placing an additional defibrillator lead in a tributary of the coronary sinus.

Lactate removal during active recovery related to the individual anaerobic and ventilatory thresholds in soccer players.

The aim of this study was to compare the lactate (La) removal during active recovery at three different work rates below the individual anaerobic threshold (IAT). Recently, it has been recommended that exercise intensity should be determined in relation to the IAT instead of the percentage of maximal oxygen uptake ( V(.)O(2max)), especially for training and research purposes. Therefore, we defined the recovery work rates by calculating 50% of the threshold difference (Delta T) between the IAT and the individual ventilatory threshold (IVT) work rates, then choosing the IVT(+50%DeltaT), the IVT and the IVT(-50%DeltaT). All these work rates fell within the range (30-70% V(.)O(2max)) previously reported for optimal La removal. After a 6-min treadmill run at 90% V(.)O(2max), soccer players [ n=12 male, age 22 (1) years] performed, in a random order, four 30-min recovery treatments: (1) run at IVT(+50%DeltaT), (2) at IVT, (3) at IVT(-50%DeltaT), (4) passive recovery. La was obtained at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 20, 25 and 30 min of recovery. The La removal curve was significantly affected by treatments ( P<0.01) and recovery timing ( P<0.01), with a significant interaction between them ( P<0.01). Although they were more efficient than passive recovery, the studied work rates [between 39 (7) and 60 (4)% V(.)O(2max)) produced different lactate removal curves. IVT and IVT(-50%DeltaT) were significantly more efficient than IVT(+50%DeltaT), while no difference was found between IVT and IVT(-50%DeltaT) for any time point. In conclusion, both IVT(-50%DeltaT) and IVT were efficient individual work rates for La removal, and no further La decrease occurred after 20 min.

Special program to reduce cardiology consultation waiting lists: report on an innovatory experience.

The problem of waiting lists has been widely debated in the Portuguese society. In this paper, the authors report the first results of a prioritization approach, started in March 2000. In this program cardiologists and general practitioners work in close proximity, coordinating efforts in order to improve the establishment of clinical priorities, and consequently optimize hospital referral. Working as cardiology consultants, the authors were able to reduce the number of first consultation requests by 77.9% (December 2002). For the first time it was possible to match the number of requests with the available consultation times, halting the growth of the waiting list.

Evaluation of aortic stenosis severity: role of contrast echocardiography in comparison with conventional echocardiography and cardiac catheterization.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of contrast Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of aortic stenosis severity, in comparison with the conventional method and using the catheterization study as the gold standard. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective comparative study. SETTING: Echocardiography Laboratory of Cardiology Department. POPULATION: We included 36 consecutive patients, 20 male, aged 67 +/- 11 years, referred for catheterization study to evaluate aortic stenosis severity. METHODS: All patients underwent conventional and contrast Doppler echocardiography and catheterization study. For contrast Doppler, we used Levovist (300 mg/ml infusion). We analyzed the following echocardiographic parameters: a) left ventricle dimensions, wall thickness and function; b) aortic valve morphology; c) post-stenotic aortic valve flow--peak velocity, velocity-time integral, peak gradient, mean gradient; d) left ventricle outflow tract flow--peak velocity, velocity-time integral; e) aortic valve functional area; f) acquisition time and Doppler signal intensity for post-stenotic aortic valve flow. Catheterization parameters analyzed: a) peak aortic valve gradient; b) mean aortic valve gradient. RESULTS: Contrast Doppler yielded higher peak gradients than conventional Doppler (85.6 +/- 30.2 vs 72.6 +/- 26.1 mmHg, p < 0.001), as well as higher mean gradients (51.4 +/- 19.0 vs 44.2 +/- 15.9 mmHg, p < 0.001). Peak gradients obtained with contrast Doppler correlated with those obtained invasively (r = 0.88, p < 0.001), although the values were higher (85.6 +/- 30.2 vs 73.6 +/- 32.0 mmHg, p < 0.001). There was no difference between mean contrast Doppler gradients and mean catheterization gradients, which showed a high correlation (r = 0.89, p < 0.001). There was no difference between peak and mean gradients obtained by conventional Doppler and invasively, which yielded correlations of 0.73 and 0.75, respectively (p < 0.001). The sensitivity of contrast Doppler for detection of severe aortic stenosis was 100% for peak gradient and 84% for mean gradient, while for conventional Doppler it was 68% and 58%. The specificity of contrast Doppler was 65% for peak gradient and 88% for mean gradient, while for conventional Doppler it was, respectively, 58% and 88%. Acquisition time for aortic flow visualization was lower (p < 0.001) and flow intensity higher for contrast Doppler, in comparison with conventional Doppler. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, contrast Doppler yielded high correlations with invasive data and higher sensitivity and specificity for detection of severe aortic stenosis than conventional Doppler. It is a useful method for evaluation of aortic stenosis severity.