The Need for Comprehensive Medical Management in Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis: A Review Article.

The incidence of spontaneous or primary spondylodiscitis has been increasing over the years, affecting the aging population with multiple comorbidities. Several conditions influencing treatment outcomes stand out, such as diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, cardiovascular and respiratory dysfunction, and malnutrition. Due to these, the question arises regarding properly managing their current conditions and pre-existing disease states. Treatment plans must consider all concomitant comorbidities rather than just the infectious process. This can be done with the help of multidisciplinary teams to provide comprehensive care for patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis. To date, there is no article regarding comprehensive medicine for spontaneous pyogenic spondylodiscitis; hence, this paper reviews the evidence available in current literature, recognizes knowledge gaps, and suggests comprehensive care for treating patients with spinal infections. Pre-requisites for implementing multidisciplinary teams include leadership, administrative support, and team dynamics. This group comprises an appointed leader, coordinator, and different subspecialists, such as orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease specialists, internists, rehabilitation doctors, psychiatrists, microbiologists, radiologists, nutritionists, pharmacologists, nurses, and orthotists working together with mutual trust and respect. Employing collaborative teams allows faster time for diagnosis and improves clinical outcomes, better quality of life, and patient satisfaction. Forefront communication is clear and open between all team members to provide holistic patient care. With these in mind, the need for employing multidisciplinary teams and the feasibility of its implementation emerges, showing a promising and logical path toward providing comprehensive care in managing multimorbid patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

5-year outcomes of surgical intervention in patients with adult spine deformity according to preoperative 5-item modified frailty index scores.

PURPOSE: Frailty increases vulnerability to dependency and/or death, and is important in predicting the risk for adverse effects following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. For easy determination of frailty, the 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) was established. However, there are few reports that show the relationship between frailty and mid-term operative outcomes after ASD surgery. The objective of this retrospective study is to determine the correlation of frailty using mFi-5 scores with postoperative medical complications, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), and radiographic alignment 5 years after ASD surgery. METHODS: 208 patients were divided into robust (R), pre-frail (PF), and frail (F) groups based on mFI-5 scores. Postoperative medical complications, preoperative and 5-year follow-up PROMs and radiographic alignment were evaluated. RESULTS: The study included 91, 79, and 38 patients in group R, PF, and F, respectively. There was no significant difference in age and sex. Discharge to care facility (16 (18%):21 (27%):16 (42%), p = 0.014) and postoperative cardiac complications (2 (2%):0 (0%):3 (8%), p = 0.031) were higher in frail patients. Preoperative ODI (38.3:45.3:54.7, p < 0.001) and SRS-22 (2.7:2.5:2.3, p = 0.004), 5-year postoperative ODI (27:27.2:37.9, p = 0.015), 5-year postoperative SVA (57.8°:78.5°:86.4°, p = 0.039) and 5-year postoperative TPA (23.9°:29.4°:29.5°, p = 0.011) were significantly worse in group F compared to group R. CONCLUSION: Postoperatively, frail patients are more likely to have cardiac complications, inferior PROMs and deterioration of post-correction global spinal alignment. Preoperative assessment using mFI-5 is beneficial to individualize risks, optimize patients, and manage postoperative expectations.

Medical complications following adult spinal deformity correction in patients with autoimmune disease.

OBJECTIVE: An aberrant inflammatory response, which plays a role in the development of postoperative complications, is observed in autoimmune diseases, Yet, there is a paucity of literature regarding the effects of autoimmune diseases after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. The goal of this study was to determine the effects of autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus) on postoperative medical complications, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and radiographic alignment in patients who underwent ASD surgery. METHODS: Propensity-score matching for age and sex was performed for patients with autoimmune disease (group A) and nonautoimmune patients (group NA1). Postoperative medical complications, preoperative and 2-year follow-up PROMs, and preoperative, immediate postoperative, and 2-year follow-up radiographic alignment were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 386 patients (27 in group A and 359 in group NA1), autoimmune patients had a higher incidence of respiratory complications (11.1% vs 2.2%, p = 0.036), gastrointestinal complications (14.8% vs 3.1%, p = 0.016), urinary tract infections (14.8% vs 3.1%, p = 0.016), cholecystitis (7.4% vs 0%, p = 0.005), and fever of unknown origin (14.8% vs 0%, p < 0.001). Autoimmune patients had worse preoperative ODI (54.2 vs 44.7, p = 0.004) and 2-year follow-up Scoliosis Research Society 22-item Questionnaire (SRS-22) scores (3.1 vs 3.5, p = 0.039), with higher preoperative sacral slope (23.4° vs 17.8°, p = 0.020). Propensity-score matching for age and sex yielded 27 pairs (group A and group NA2). Having at least one medical complication (group A 74.1% vs group NA2 22.2%, p < 0.001), total complications per person (1.3 vs 0.3, p = 0.010), prognostic nutrition index (44.8 vs 48.6, p = 0.034), steroid use (51.9% vs 0%, p < 0.001), immunosuppressant use (48.1% vs 0%, p < 0.001), length of hospital stay (38 vs 27 days, p = 0.018), and discharge to care facility (29.6% vs 7.4%, p = 0.036) were higher in group A. Preoperative ODI (54.2 vs 43.2, p = 0.011) and 2-year follow-up SRS-22 scores (3.1 vs 3.6 p = 0.019) were worse in group A. No differences were observed in radiographic alignment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with autoimmune disease had higher complication rates and worse PROMs following ASD surgery in this study. There was no difference in spinal alignment compared with controls. Multidisciplinary planning and full disclosure of possible adverse effects should be completed prior to correction of ASD in patients with autoimmune disease.