Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 52(3): 291-295, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35953345

ABSTRACT

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an integral part of the evaluation of local and regional disease in tongue squamous cell carcinoma prior to surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of MRI in assessing tumour dimensions, as well as the impact of the time-lag from diagnostic biopsy on the accuracy of MRI. The medical records of 64 patients with tongue carcinoma were reviewed retrospectively. Tumour maximum diameter and tumour depth of invasion were compared between pathology and MRI (T1- and T2-weighted). MRI-derived maximum tumour diameter and depth of invasion correlated strongly with histopathology: T1-weighted (r = 0.700 and r = 0.813, respectively) and T2-weighted (r = 0.734 and r = 0.834, respectively). A significant correlation was found between measurements on T1 and T2 MRI for both parameters (P = 0.955 and P = 0.984, respectively). The accuracy rate of MRI for T-staging of early tumours was low: 10% for T1 tumours; 39.3% for T2 tumours. A time-lag of less than 2 weeks between the diagnostic biopsy and MRI adversely affected the correlation of tumour dimensions. MRI is a reliable tool for evaluating tongue carcinoma; however, it overestimates early tumours. A 2-week delay after diagnostic biopsy is desired before completing an MRI. Alternatively, if logistics allow, a pre-biopsy MRI is preferred, especially for T1-T2 tumours.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Tongue Neoplasms , Humans , Tongue Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Tongue Neoplasms/surgery , Tongue Neoplasms/pathology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Neoplasm Staging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology
2.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 57(10): 1098-1101, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31635760

ABSTRACT

Microsurgical free flaps are common in head and neck reconstruction, and their techniques and outcomes have continuously improved during the past decades. However, there are variations in practice among surgeons between the use of closed-suction drainage systems and Penrose drains. The proponents of Penrose drains propose that the negative pressure generated by the closed-suction drainage system may harm the microvascular anastomosis. We know of no previous studies that have compared the two drains for microvascular free flap reconstruction, so our aim was to compare them in a single-centre, retrospective review of all patients who had microvascular free flap reconstruction of the head and neck region in our department between 1 November 2010 and 1 September 2017. During this period 84 patients had 87 free flap reconstructions in the head and neck, 43 of which had Penrose, and 44 closed-suction, drainage. We compared the number of complications between the groups including haematomas, seromas, wound infections, anastomostic thrombosis, anastomotic revision, and need for re-exploration. There were no significant differences between the groups, despite a trend toward fewer negative explorations in the closed-suction group. There were no differences in complications between suction and passive drainage systems after microvascular free flaps, which suggests that closed suction drainage could be safely used after free flap reconstruction in the head and neck.


Subject(s)
Free Tissue Flaps , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Drainage , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Postoperative Complications , Retrospective Studies , Suction
3.
J Laryngol Otol ; 132(1): 29-32, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29179790

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies found that mobile phone users had a significantly greater risk of having elevated thresholds in speech frequencies. This study investigated the correlation between the laterality of sudden sensorineural hearing loss, handedness and the preferred ear for mobile phone use. METHODS: The study included all patients who presented with sudden sensorineural hearing loss to the Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery in our tertiary referral medical centre between 2014 and 2016. Patients were asked to indicate their dominant hand and preferred ear for mobile phone use. RESULTS: The study comprised 160 patients. No correlation was found between the dominant hand or preferred ear for mobile phone use and the side of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. There was no correlation between the side of the sudden sensorineural hearing loss (preferable or non-preferable for mobile phone use) and audiometric characteristics. CONCLUSION: No correlation was found between the laterality of ears used for mobile phone and sudden sensorineural hearing loss.


Subject(s)
Cell Phone , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/etiology , Hearing/physiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Female , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...