Comparison of Phenytoin and Fosphenytoin in Treatment of Active Seizures in the Emergency Department.

Background and Objective: Ongoing seizure in the Emergency Department is a medical emergency and its aggressive management is essential. Prompt antiepileptic therapy with early cessation of seizure would minimize the morbidity and risk of recurrence. To compare time to seizure control with fosphenytoin to phenytoin protocol in the ED. Materials and Methods: We conducted an observational study on patients with active seizure in the Emergency Department comparing phenytoin versus fosphenytoin protocol over one year. Results: During the study period, we recruited 121 patients in the phenytoin group and 124 patients in the fosphenytoin group. Generalized tonic-clonic seizure (73.5% in phenytoin vs. 68.5% in fosphenytoin arm) was the most common type of seizure in both the arms. The mean time taken for cessation of seizure in the fosphenytoin arm (17.48 ± 49.24) was less than half of that in the phenytoin arm (37.20 ± 58.17) (mean difference: 19.72, P = 0.004, 95% CI: -33.27 to -6.17). There was a significant decrease in recurrence rates of seizure with phenytoin compared to the fosphenytoin arm (17.7% vs. 31.4%: OR: 0.47, P = 0.013; 95% CI: 0.26-0.86). Favorable STESS (≤2) was higher with phenytoin compared to fosphenytoin (60.3% vs. 48.4%). The overall in-hospital mortality rate in both arms was negligible (0.8%). Conclusion: The mean time for cessation of active seizure with fosphenytoin was less than half that of phenytoin. Despite its higher cost and minor adverse effects when compared to phenytoin, benefits seem to outweigh its limitation.

Factors Affecting the Time to First Dose Antibiotic in Sepsis in Acute Emergency.

BACKGROUND: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommends the administration of antibiotics within 1 hour of triage time in sepsis patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors affecting the time to first dose antibiotics in sepsis patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study on factors affecting the time to first dose antibiotics in patients with sepsis presenting to the ED over a period of 7 months (July 2019 to January 2020). The purpose of this study was to determine the factors affecting the time to first dose antibiotics in sepsis patients. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 410 patients with a mean age of 51.6 years were presented to the ED with sepsis. Majority was triaged to priority 1 (84.8%). The median door to antibiotic time was 50 minutes (IQR, 40-90). Two-thirds (68%) of the patients (279) received antibiotics within 60 minutes. The blood culture positivity rate was 22.9%, and the contamination rate was 6%. The most common factors for the delay were atypical presentation (36.6%) and unknown focus of infection (36.6%). Triage to non-acute areas of the ED (priority 2) was associated with delayed antibiotic administration [odds ratio (OR), 7.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.03-13.36; p-value <0.001]. Patients presented with cellulitis and necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI) had received antibiotics within an hour compared to other diagnoses (18.3 vs 8.4%; OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2-4.9; p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Two-thirds of our patients received their first dose of antibiotics within an hour of presentation to the ED. Triage to lower priorities was an independent risk factor for delay in first-dose antibiotic administration, and patients presented with an obvious focus of infections like cellulitis and NSTI received their first dose of antibiotic much earlier when compared to other diagnoses. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Joseph JV, Madhiyazhagan M, Roshan R, Dhanapal SG, Arul S, Abhilash KPP. Factors Affecting the Time to First Dose Antibiotic in Sepsis in Acute Emergency. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(10):1155-1160.

Medication - A boon or bane: Emergencies due to medication-related visits.

BACKGROUND: Medication-related visits (MRV) to the Emergency Department (ED) are substantial though weakly recognized and intervened. Data from developing countries on the prevalence of MRV-related ED admissions are scanty. This study is first of its kind in India to estimate the prevalence of MRV, its severity and the factors contributing to these visits. METHODOLOGY: This prospective observational study was done in the ED of an apex tertiary care center in August 2018. A convenient cross-sectional sample of patients presenting with emergencies regarding drug use or ill-use were included and a questionnaire filled after obtaining a written informed consent. RESULTS: During the study period, a cross-sectional sample of 443 patients was studied and the prevalence of MRV was 27.1% (120/443). The mean age was 55 (standard deviation: 15) years with a male preponderance (60.8%). Triage priority I patients comprised 39.1%. Common presenting complaints included vomiting (25%), seizure (20.8%), giddiness (20%), and abdomen pain (17.5%). Less than ½ (43.3%) were compliant to prescribed medication. The most common reasons for MRV were failure to receive drugs/noncompliance (47.5%), subtherapeutic dosage (25%), and adverse drug reaction (16.7%). Severity of MRV was classified as mild (50%), moderate (38.3%), and severe (11.7%). Out of these visits, 71 (59.2%) were deemed preventable. Three-fourths (73.3%) were stabilized and discharged from the ED. CONCLUSION: The fact that a quarter of the ED visits are due to MRV and that more than half of them are preventable is quite alarming. Diligent patient education by the treating physicians may perhaps help in decreasing the incidence of this deleterious event.

Aspiration during Rapid Sequence Induction: Prevalence and Risk Factors.

BACKGROUND: Securing definitive airway with minimal complications is a challenging task for high-volume emergency departments (ED) that deal with patients with compromised airway. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study between September 2019 and March 2020. Cohort of adults presenting to the ED requiring rapid sequence induction (RSI) were recruited to determine the prevalence and risk factors for the development of aspiration pneumonia(AP) in patients intubated in the ED. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 154 patients with a mean age of 44.5 years required RSI in the ED. Male (61%) predominance was noted among the study cohorts. We did not find any association between RSI performed in the ED and the risk of developing AP. The first attempt success rate of RSI was 76.7%, and 33(21.4%) patients had immediate adverse events following RSI. Rescue intubation was required for 11(7.1%) patients. The prevalence of AP following RSI in the ED was 13.4%. Endotracheal tube (ET) aspirate pepsin was positive in 45(29.2%) samples collected. The ET aspirate pepsin assay had low sensitivity (44.44%), specificity (73.53%), positive predictive value (18%), and negative predictive value (91%) in predicting the occurrence of AP. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, male gender (AOR: 7.29, 95%CI: 1.51-35.03, p = 0.013) and diabetes mellitus (AOR: 3.75, 95%CI: 1.23-11.51, p = 0.02) were found to be independent risk factors for developing AP. CONCLUSION: We identified male gender and diabetes mellitus to be independent predictors of risk of developing AP after RSI in the ED. ET aspirate pepsin levels proved to be neither sensitive nor specific in the diagnosis of AP. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Roshan R, Sudhakar GD, Vijay J, Mamta M, Amirtharaj J, Priya G, et al. Aspiration during Rapid Sequence Induction: Prevalence and Risk Factors. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(2):140-145.