ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In this exploratory study, we examined attitudes regarding mental health treatment among 10 Asian American patients in an urban primary care setting to better understand contextual barriers to care. METHODS: Ten semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with Asian Americans recruited from primary care practices in an urban medical center. RESULTS: The study's qualitative data suggest that focusing on specific cultural concerns is essential for increasing mental health access for Asian Americans. Although few participants initially expressed interest in a culturally focused mental health program themselves, when phrased as being part of their primary care practice, 8 expressed interest. Furthermore, most felt that the program could help family or friends. Many participants preferred to seek care initially from social systems and alternative and complementary medicine before seeking psychiatric care. CONCLUSIONS: Because Asian Americans face notable barriers to seeking mental health treatment, addressing cultural concerns by providing culturally sensitive care could help make mental health treatment more acceptable, particularly among less acculturated individuals. To our knowledge, this is the first qualitative study exploring barriers to Asian Americans accessing integrated mental health services in primary care.
Subject(s)
Asian/psychology , Attitude to Health , Cultural Competency/psychology , Mental Health Services , Primary Health Care , Adult , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) experience lower-quality health care and are at higher risk of experiencing adverse events than fluent English speakers. Despite some formal training for health professions students on caring for patients with LEP, the hidden curriculum may have a greater influence on learning. The authors designed this study to characterize the hidden curriculum that medical and nursing students experience regarding the care of patients with LEP. METHOD: In 2014, the authors invited students from one medical school and one nursing school, who had completed an interprofessional pilot curriculum on caring for patients with LEP 6 to 10 months earlier, to participate in semistructured interviews about their clinical training experiences with LEP patients. The authors independently coded the interview transcripts, compared them for agreement, and performed content analysis to identify major themes. RESULTS: Thirteen students (7 medical and 6 nursing students) participated. Four major themes emerged: role modeling, systems factors, learning environment, and organizational culture. All 13 students described negative role modeling experiences, and most described role modeling that the authors coded as "indifferent." Students felt that the current system and learning environment did not support or emphasize high-quality care for patients with LEP. CONCLUSIONS: The hidden curriculum that health professional students experience regarding the care of patients with LEP is influenced by systems limitations and a learning environment and organizational culture that value efficiency over effective communication. Role modeling seems strongly linked to these factors as supervisors struggle with these same challenges.
