Endovascular treatment with an iliac branch endoprosthesis for a right subclavian artery aneurysm.

Subclavian artery aneurysms are rare peripheral artery aneurysms, and open surgical repair is the reference standard treatment. We have reported the case a patient with a right subclavian artery aneurysm who was not indicated for open surgical repair because of comorbidities. Thus, endovascular treatment using the Gore Excluder Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis (WL Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) was performed, leading to complete aneurysmal exclusion without perioperative complications. Although anatomic limitations exist, this technique could be alternative treatment option for right subclavian artery aneurysms.

Evaluation of heparin-bonded ePTFE grafts for forearm loop vascular access: Comparison between Gore® PROPATEN vascular graft and ACUSEAL vascular graft.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study evaluates the clinical outcomes of two heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts, PROPATEN and ACUSEAL (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA), for forearm loop vascular access. METHODS: We prospectively collected data on 60 patients who had undergone arteriovenous graft of the forearm loop type between January 2015 and December 2019. The primary endpoints were graft primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates. Secondary endpoints were time to first cannulation and postoperative complications. RESULTS: We enrolled 36 patients in the PROPATEN group (Group P) and 24 in the ACUSEAL group (Group A). All procedures were successful without any 30-day mortality. The median times to first cannulation were 16.5 days and 3 days in Groups P and A, respectively (p < 0.001). Mean follow-up periods were 13.4 ± 14.5 and 17.3 ± 9.3 months, respectively. Primary patency rates were 81% and 64%, respectively, at 6 months, and 60% and 40%, respectively, at 12 months (p = 0.008). Assisted primary patency rates were 96% and 83% at 6 months, 91% and 73% at 12 months, and 81% and 35% at 24 months (p = 0.044). Secondary patency rates were 96% and 81% at 12 months, and 87% and 62% at 24 months (p = 0.207). As a remote-period complication, disruption of the luminal layer of the graft was observed in two patients (4.2%) in Group A due to puncture and thrombectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Although the ACUSEAL graft offers the advantage of early cannulation, its primary and assisted primary patency outcomes were inferior to those of the PROPATEN graft. It is important for physicians to be aware of the different characteristics of each graft to select the best option for each patient.

Early clinical outcomes of retrograde in situ branched stent grafting for complex aortic arch aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the early outcomes of retrograde in situ branched stent grafting (RIBS) using the gutter balloon technique for complex aortic arch aneurysms (CAAs). METHODS: The RIBS technique is an in situ needle fenestration procedure during thoracic endovascular aortic repair with the reconstruction of cervical branches. The double RIBS (D-RIBS) for the reconstruction of the left common carotid artery and the brachiocephalic artery using the gutter balloon technique was performed in 30 high-risk patients. We describe the early clinical results of the D-RIBS technique for CAAs. Primary end points were technical success and 30-day mortality. Secondary end points were postoperative complications, rates of endoleaks, overall survival, aneurysm-related death, and reinterventions. RESULTS: The mean age was 77.1 ± 6.6 years, and the mean maximum minor-axis aneurysmal diameter was 65.9 ± 8.9 mm. Twenty-six patients underwent D-RIBS for elective arch aortic aneurysm, and four patients were for reintervention after zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair failure. Stent graft puncture was performed 60 times from the common carotid arteries, and technical success was achieved in all cases (100%). Postoperative complications included cerebral infarction in two patients (6.7%) and recurrent nerve palsy in one patient (3.3%). The 30-day mortality was 0%. During the median follow-up period of 14 months (6-56 months), overall survival at 12 months was 92.3% without any aneurysm-related death. Type 1 b and type 2 endoleaks were observed in one each, and no reintervention was encountered. CONCLUSIONS: Early clinical outcomes of the D-RIBS for high-risk patients with CAAs are acceptable. The gutter balloon method enables safe and reliable fenestration. Further studies and dedicated devices are warranted.

Long-term results of the Japanese multicenter Viabahn trial of heparin bonded endovascular stent grafts for long and complex lesions in the superficial femoral artery.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of endovascular stent grafting to treat long, complex lesions in the superficial femoral artery (SFA). METHODS: The present prospective, multicenter study at 15 Japanese hospitals assessed heparin-bonded stent grafts used to treat long SFA lesions in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. The inclusion criteria were Rutherford category 2 to 5 symptoms (grade 5 without active infection), an ankle brachial index of ≤0.9, and SFA lesions ≥10 cm long with ≥50% stenosis. The key efficacy and safety outcomes were primary-assisted patency and adverse events through 24 months, respectively. The secondary outcomes included primary patency, secondary patency, freedom from target lesion revascularization (fTLR), and Vascular Quality of Life questionnaire score. RESULTS: Of the 103 patients (mean age, 74.2 ± 7.0 years; 82.5% male), 100 (97.1%) had intermittent claudication. The average lesion length was 21.8 ± 5.8 cm; 87 lesions (84.5%) were TASC (Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Document on Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease) C or D (65.7% chronic total occlusions). Of the 103 patients, 92 and 61 were evaluable through 24 and 60 months, respectively. At 24 months, the Kaplan-Meier-estimated primary-assisted patency, primary patency, and secondary patency rate was 85.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76.3%-91.5%), 78.8% (95% CI, 68.8%-85.9%), and 92.0% (95% CI, 82.4%-96.5%), respectively. The mean ankle brachial index was 0.64 ± 0.12 at baseline and 0.94 ± 0.19 at 24 months (P < .0001). At 24 and 60 months, the fTLR was 87.2% (95% CI, 78.9%-92.3%) and 79.1% (95% CI, 67.9%-86.8%), respectively. No device- or procedure-related life- or limb-threatening critical events or acute limb ischemia cases were observed through 5 years. No stent fractures were detected on the annually scheduled follow-up radiographs. The vascular quality of life questionnaire and walking impairment questionnaire scores were significantly increased at 1 through 24 months compared with the baseline scores (P < .0001 for both). One patient had required conversion to open bypass during the 5-year follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Stent grafting of long and complex SFA lesions in patients with claudication is safe and effective through long-term follow-up, with 79.1% fTLR and no leg amputation, acute limb ischemia, or stent fractures through 5 years.

Clinical Impact of Stent Graft Thrombosis in Femoropopliteal Arterial Lesions.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to elucidate the clinical impact and prognosis of stent graft (SG) thrombosis. BACKGROUND: The VIABAHN SG offers a favorable outcome in long peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAOD) lesions in the femoropopliteal artery. One concern after SG deployment is the incidence of stent thrombosis and consequent acute limb ischemia (ALI). METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study, we collected the clinical data of PAOD patients treated with VIABAHN SG who subsequently experienced SG thrombosis. The clinical symptoms of SG thrombosis, patency after reintervention, and predictors of loss of patency after reintervention were examined. RESULTS: VIABAHN SGs were used for 1,215 patients; SG thrombosis occurred in 159 (13%) patients at a median of 6.4 months (interquartile range: 2.8 to 13.5 months) after SG implantation; 21 (13%) patients presented with ALI. A total of 131 (82%) patients underwent reintervention for SG thrombosis, whereas 2 (1%) underwent primary major amputation and the remaining 26 (16%) were treated conservatively. The patency rate 1 year after reintervention, freedom from major adverse limb events, and limb salvage after reintervention were 54.9%, 73.6%, and 92.5%, respectively. Critical limb-threatening ischemia at SG implantation and ALI presentation at SG thrombosis were positively associated with an increased risk of rethrombosis, whereas distal stent diameter was negatively associated with the risk of rethrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: SG thrombosis is associated with a considerable risk of ALI, but the risk of primary major amputation was not high. Clinical outcomes after reinterventions for thrombosed SGs were suboptimal.

Neural dysfunctions following experimental permanent occlusions of bilateral common carotid arteries cause an increase of rat voluntary alcohol drinking behavior.

We have previously reported that ischemic animal models treated with a respiratory inhibitor, rotenon, show an increased voluntary alcohol intake. Although it is clear that ischemic brain, as a result of reduced-blood flow, shows pathological events and/or neuro-degenerations apparently, little is known of causal relationship between the mechanism of neural dysfunction and voluntary alcohol consumption. Authors have investigated effects of permanent two-vessel occlusion (p2VO) on rat voluntary alcohol drinking behavior. In first experiment the p2VO-treated rats showed an increase of voluntary alcohol drinking behavior, as compared with sham controls. Using brain microdialysis technique, increases of only nucleus accumbens (ACC) dopamine (DA) releases were suppressed in the p2VO-treated rats significantly, following the high K+ (40 mM) perfusion through the microdialysis probe membrane. Alcohol (200 mM) perfusion-induced DA and serotonin (5-HT) releases in the ACC of the p2VO-treated rats were suppressed significantly in the second experiment, as compared with the sham-treated rats. In third experiment p2VO-treated rats showed significant decreases of the contents of DA, not 5-HT, in the ACC, caudate-putamen (C/P), ventral tegmental area-substantia nigra (VT/SN) and lateral hypothalamus (LH). Dopaminergic neurons in the ACC showed more functional vulnerability against the p2VO treatments, as compared with the serotonergic neurons. An increase of alcohol intake in the p2VO-treated rats means the compensation for the neural degeneration of the dopaminergic system in the ACC consisted brain rewarding system. It was likely suggested that neural disturbance of higher functions involved with incomplete global brain ischemia leads the risk of an abnormal alcohol drinking in human.

Outcomes of Chimney Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for an Aortic Arch Aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Chimney thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) has advantages that include no requirements for special devices; however, problems have been identified such as gutter leaks. The aim of this study is to evaluate the short- and mid-term results of TEVAR with chimney technique including the safety, efficacy, and risk factors for occurrence of gutter endoleak in this technique. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was conducted on 55 consecutive patients who underwent first-time chimney TEVAR for arch aneurysms in the past 7 years. This consisted of 33 cases of single-chimney (SC) TEVAR and 22 cases of double-chimney (DC) TEVAR. The outcomes of these 55 cases of SC-TEVAR and DC-TEVAR were retrospectively examined. Risk factors for endoleaks in chimney TEVAR were also examined. RESULTS: Operative mortalities of 3.0% and 4.5% were observed in SC-TEVAR and DC-TEVAR, respectively. Incidences of stroke were 12.1% in the SC-TEVAR and 4.5% in the DC-TEVAR, resulting in endoleaks in 16 patients (48.5%) in SC-TEVAR and 6 patients (27.3%) in DC-TEVAR. Only 1 of the 77 chimney grafts was occluded, with a patency rate of 98.7%. SC-TEVAR and small distance from the common carotid artery were the risk factors of type I endoleaks. Overall survival rates over a period of 1, 3, and 5 years were 82.3%, 78.0%, and 57.7%, respectively, in the SC-TEVAR group and 95.2%, 89.3%, and 76.5%, respectively, in the DC-TEVAR group. Freedom from aneurysm-related death over 1, 3, and 5 years was 82.3%, 69.0%, and 57.7%, respectively, in the SC-TEVAR group and 95.2%, 89.3%, and 89.3% in the DC-TEVAR group. Freedom from secondary intervention over 1, 3, and 5 years was 80.2%, 64.7%, and 47.2%, respectively, in the SC-TEVAR group and 95.0%, 74.0%, and 74.0%, respectively, in the DC-TEVAR group. CONCLUSIONS: The short- and mid-term results of chimney TEVAR were worse than expectation. Especially, the results of SC-TEVAR were not acceptable because of extremely high incidence of type I endoleak and high incidence of stroke.

A new option using adjunctive microsheath angiography to increase the safety during percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endovascular aortic repair (PEVAR) is widespread for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The purpose of this study was to present outcomes of PEVAR using simultaneous angiography via microsheath. METHODS: There were 100 punctures in 50 patients undergoing PEVAR for AAA. All cases used the ProGlide closure device (Abbot Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) for PEVAR, and another puncture with microsheath placed on the common femoral artery for a second insertion point of the ProGlide. Basically, a single ProGlide was used for each puncture in the PEVAR. Hemostasis, stenosis, dissection, and distal embolization were confirmed in angiography via the adjunctive microsheath after removal of the delivery system. Since the PEVAR for AAA requires at least two punctures, this procedure was applied to both sites. Primary outcome was technical success and occurrence rates of access-related complications in PEVAR. Technical success was defined as complete hemostasis without surgical intervention and the need for conversion to general anesthesia. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 98% (98/100) of the cases. Access-related complications on perioperative periods were identified in two cases. One case involved a tip of the microsheath being transected by the ProGlide that led to a distal embolization, which is why a cut down was required to retrieve the tip of the sheath. Another case required a cut down due to persistent hemorrhage from the puncture site of the microsheath. Although persistent hemorrhage was identified in five punctures (5.0%) via the adjunctive microsheath angiography, additional manual compression or ProGlide achieved complete hemostasis. Both stenosis and dissection following PEVAR were not identified in any case. CONCLUSIONS: A supporting angiography via microsheath in confirming the absence of hemorrhage, stenosis, dissection, and distal embolization may be worthwhile to selectively use for cases of PEVAR.

Current status of endovascular treatment for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

Open surgical repair (OSR) for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) is maximally invasive and associated with high rates of operative mortality and perioperative complications including spinal cord ischemia (SCI), despite improvements in surgical techniques and perioperative care. Elderly patients, patients with a history of aortic surgery, and patients with severe comorbidities are often considered ineligible for this surgery and endovascular treatment may be their only treatment option. Total endovascular aneurysm repair (t-EVAR) without debranching surgery does not require thoracotomy and laparotomy and could improve the outcomes of these patients. t-EVAR includes fenestrated EVAR (f-EVAR), multi-branched EVAR (b-EVAR), and physician-modified fenestration endograft (PMFG). Although these techniques have achieved lower mortality rates than OSR, there are concerns about perioperative complications including limb ischemia, SCI, and long-term outcomes such as endograft migration and endoleaks (ELs). This article provides an overview of available endovascular devices for TAAAs and reviews the short and mid-term results of t-EVAR, as well as alternative options.

A Novel Shaggy Aorta Scoring System to Predict Embolic Complications Following Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between shaggy aorta and embolic complications during thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR), based on a shaggy aorta scoring system. METHODS: The entire aorta was assessed based on 5 mm slice computed tomography (CT) from the sinotubular junction to the aortic bifurcation using a three dimensional workstation. One shaggy point (shaggy score) was given when the following conditions were met: 1) ulcer like thrombus, 2) maximum thrombus thickness ≥ 5 mm, and 3) mural thrombus occupies more than two thirds of the circumference of the aortic diameter on reconstructed CT of the axial statue. Subsequently, each point was added to obtain the total shaggy score. RESULTS: The outcomes of 301 patients undergoing TEVAR were evaluated. Post-operative embolic complications including stroke, acute renal failure, and distal embolisation, were identified in 21 cases (7.0%). The average shaggy score for the entire cohort was 2.4 ± 5.6 points, whereas it was 7.9 ± 7.1 in those patients with embolic complications (E group) and 2.0 ± 5.3 in those without embolic complications (N group, p = .001). There were no statistical differences in 30 day mortality (p = .70), but overall survival at two years was significantly lower in the E group (E: 58.8%, N: 93.3%, p < .001). Multivariable analysis revealed that the predictors of post-operative embolic complication were past history of cerebrovascular disease (p = .001, OR 5.90, 95% CI 2.14-16.29) and shaggy score (p < .001, OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06-1.19). The area under the ROC curve was 0.77, and the cut off value of the shaggy score using the Youden index was 3 points (sensitivity: 71.4%, specificity: 81.4%). CONCLUSION: This shaggy score is a useful method to predict post-operative embolic complications following TEVAR. Because the risk of embolic complications was relatively high in patients with a high shaggy score, the indication for TEVAR in such patients should be considered carefully.

Bidirectional loop-snare technique for adherent inferior vena cava filter retrieval.

Placement of a Günther Tulip Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Filter™ (Cook, Bloomington, IN, USA) is an alternative treatment option to prevent pulmonary embolism in patients in whom anticoagulation therapy is contraindicated. Most patients require filter placement for only short periods, after which it can be retrieved. IVC filter retrieval becomes more difficult as the indwelling time increases. We developed a new method to retrieve the Günther Tulip IVC Filter™, namely, the bidirectional loop-snare technique (BLT). The key to the BLT procedure is to use 2 snares from both the jugular and femoral access routes. The jugular snare catches the filter hook and the femoral snare relieves the adhesion between the filter leg and IVC wall. Pulling from both the jugular and femoral ends increases the power to retrieve the IVC filter, and leads to successful filter retrieval. .

Hybrid Surgery for Multiple Visceral Artery Aneurysms: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: We present a case with multiple visceral artery aneurysms that were treated with a hybrid approach involving both surgical and endovascular treatment. CASE REPORT: The patient was a 48-year-old female. She was diagnosed with multiple visceral artery aneurysms including 2 splenic artery aneurysms, celiac artery aneurysm, and bilateral renal artery aneurysms during an examination for loss of appetite. With regard to 2 splenic artery aneurysms, the proximal aneurysm was treated surgically, whereas the peripheral aneurysm that was located deeply in the abdomen was treated with coil embolization. The celiac artery aneurysm located at the bifurcation of the common hepatic artery and splenic artery, an intracranial aneurysm clip was used. The left and right renal aneurysms were resected and renal arteries were reconstructed surgically. The postoperative course was uneventful. The pathological diagnosis of all aneurysms was segmental arterial mediolysis. The reconstructed vessels were patent without stenosis or recurrence at 1 year after the operation. CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid treatment involving surgical resection, endovascular coil embolization, and obliteration with clips was useful in the treatment of multiple visceral artery aneurysms.

Risk Factor Analyses of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Growth in Japanese Patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to retrospectively demonstrate the growth rate (mm/year) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameters (ADs) and to analyze risk factors for AAA expansion. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated the clinical data of 319 patients with AAAs who were followed up as outpatients for >2 years after their initial visit and who underwent computed tomography >4 times. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 3.7 ± 1.5 years. The annual average growth rates according to varying ADs were as follows: 1.9 ± 0.8 (AD 30-34 mm), 2.6 ± 1.2 (AD 35-39 mm), 2.8 ± 1.1 (AD 40-44 mm), 3.1 ± 1.3 (AD 45-49 mm), 3.4 ± 1.6 (AD 50-54 mm), and 3.5 ± 1.4 mm (AD ≥55 mm). Factors associated with AAA expansion were smoking (P = 0.017), hypertension (P < 0.001), and ADs (P < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, data regarding growth rates of ≥3 mm were extracted, and a statistically significant difference between smoking status and ADs of ≥40 mm was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with AAA expansion in Japanese patients included smoking, hypertension, and ADs, and a statistically significant difference was observed between smoking status and ADs of ≥40 mm.

Risk factors and treatment outcomes for stent graft infection after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to retrospectively analyze incidence, risk factors, and management of postoperative stent graft (SG) infection after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: We evaluated patients who underwent EVAR for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm at our institution between July 2006 and December 2014. The primary end point was SG infection. We compared patients' demographics between the infection (group I) and noninfection (group NI) groups and reviewed management and outcomes in group I. A risk factor for SG infection was assessed by multivariable logistic regression. Patients without aortoenteric fistula (AEF) were treated with conservative therapy for SG infection. RESULTS: A total of 1202 patients underwent EVAR for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. During a mean follow-up of 43.9 ± 30.4 months, SG infection occurred in 15 cases (incidence, 3.5/1000 person-years). The median time between initial EVAR and detection of infection was 30 months (range, 14 days-86 months). Freedom from SG infection at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years was 99.5%, 99.2%, and 98.2%, respectively. There were no differences in age, sex, comorbidities, and SG type between the groups. Coil embolization of the hypogastric artery was more frequent in group I (60% vs 31%). During follow-up before infection, type II endoleak (47% vs 24%), sac enlargement (40% vs 16%), and multiple reinterventions (13% vs 2%) were significantly higher in group I; however, after multivariate analysis, only coil embolization of the hypogastric artery (odds ratio, 3.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-9.24; P = .029) remained a significant predictor. Among the 15 patients, four had AEF and six bacteriologic species were detected in five patients (33%). Twelve patients (80%) were treated with conservative therapy; three underwent surgical therapy (two patients with SG resection, omentum patching, and extra-anatomic bypass with fistula closure or partial duodenectomy and one patient with graft preservation, irrigation, omentum patching, and aneurysmorrhaphy). In-hospital mortality occurred in three cases; two cases were due to sepsis after conservative therapy, and one case was due to aortic stump rupture after surgical therapy. Excluding in-hospital mortality cases, during a median follow-up of 31 (range, 2-76) months, five patients were lost because of cancer or senility. There was no aneurysm-related death or recurrence of SG infection. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant coil embolization was a risk factor for SG infection. For patients with AEF, surgical therapy remains the first-line treatment of SG infection after EVAR; however, conservative therapy is a viable option for SG infection in patients without AEF, particularly considering patients' comorbidities and limited life expectancy.

Early and midterm outcomes of endovascular treatment for chronic aneurysmal aortic dissection: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate endovascular treatment for enlarged Stanford type B chronic aneurysmal aortic dissection (CAAD). The conventional treatment for CAAD is open repair; however, the operative mortality is high in extensive prosthetic graft replacements. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was conducted on 74 consecutive patients who underwent endovascular treatment for CAAD in the past 8.5 years. In the partial exclusion (PE) group, entry sites in close proximity to the maximum diameter of CAAD were closed using a stent graft and reentry sites were left without closure. In the complete exclusion (CE) group, we attempted to close all entry and reentry sites. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients (PE group) and 31 patients (CE group) were included with mean ages of 59 and 63 years, respectively. Operative mortalities of 2.3% and 0% were observed in the PE and CE groups, respectively. Complete tear closure was successful in 17 of 31 patients (54.8%) in the CE group. In the PE group, complete thrombosis of the false lumen was achieved in only one case (2.3%). Freedom rates from reentry closure were 90.2%, 86.9%, and 78.2% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The diameter of the true lumen/aorta changed from 16.9/62.9 mm to 30.2/53.6 mm and from 13.7/55.1 mm to 25.8/51.0 mm in the aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta, respectively. The freedom rates from secondary intervention in successful and unsuccessful CE cases were 92.9% and 69.1%, respectively, at 1 year and 92.9% and 53.7%, respectively, at 3 years. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment for CAAD had favorable early and midterm outcomes.

Endovascular Treatment of Various Aortic Pathologies: Review of the Latest Data and Technologies.

The technologies and innovations applicable to endovascular treatment for complex aortic pathologies have progressed rapidly over the last two decades. Although the initial outcomes of an endovascular aortic repair have been excellent, as long-term data became available, complications including endoleaks, endograft migration, and endograft infection have become apparent and are of concern. Previously, the indication for endovascular therapy was restricted to descending thoracic aortic aneurysms and abdominal aortic aneurysms. However, its indication has expanded along with the improvement of techniques and devices, and currently, it has become possible to treat pararenal aortic aneurysms and Crawford type 4 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) using the off-the-shelf devices. Additionally, custom-made devices allow for the treatment of arch or more extensive TAAAs. Endovascular treatment is applied not only to aneurysms but also to acute/chronic dissections. However, long-term outcomes are still unclear. This article provides an overview of available devices and the results of endovascular treatment for various aortic pathologies.

Clinical Outcomes of Total Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Aortic Aneurysms Involving the Proximal Anastomotic Aneurysm following Initial Open Repair for Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate initial and midterm clinical outcomes of aortic aneurysms involving the proximal anastomotic aneurysm (AAPAAs) following initial open repair for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. METHODS: Between July 2006 and August 2015, 24 patients underwent elective endovascular repair for the treatment of AAPAAs at our institution. AAPAA classification has been categorized as 3 types. Type I AAPAA is the most extensive, extending from the descending aorta to the prior proximal anastomosis as similar to Crawford type II or III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. Type II AAPAA is limited to the aortic aneurysm below the diaphragm including the abdominal visceral arteries. Finally, similar to pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm, type III AAPAA involves the renal origins, but does not extend to the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries. Total endovascular aneurysm repair (t-EVAR) consisted of fenestrated EVAR (f-EVAR), multibranched EVAR (t-Branch), and snorkel EVAR (s-EVAR) were performed for patients with high-risk open surgical repair. We retrospectively analyzed 24 cases, which were categorized with 3 types of AAPAA. RESULTS: F-EVAR, t-Branch, and s-EVAR for AAPAAs were performed in 15 patients (62.5%), 5 patients (20.8%), and 4 patients (16.7%), respectively. Type I and type II AAPAA were identified in 13 patients (54.2%) and 7 patients (29.2%), and type III AAPAA was identified in 4 patients (16.7%). Technical success was 95.8%, and clinical success was 79.2% with t-EVAR. Spinal cord ischemia was identified in 2 patients (8.3%) of type I AAPAA, the 30-day mortality rate was 4.2% (n = 1, type I AAPAA). Type II and III endoleaks occurred in 1 (4.2%, type III AAPAA) and 3 patients (12.5%, each case of type I, II, and III AAPAA), respectively. There was no open conversion or aneurysm rupture in the late follow-up period. The estimated overall survival rates of t-EVAR after 1 and 3 years were 95.6% and 76.2%, respectively. Rates of freedom from aneurysm-related death and secondary intervention of t-EVAR at 3 years were 90.1% and 89.7%, respectively. Finally, rates of target vessel patency at 1 and 3 years were 95.3% and 88.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial to midterm results of t-EVAR for the treatment of AAPAA were generally good with low rates of perioperative mortality and aneurysm-related death. However, more attentions should be paid for the treatment of type I AAPAA with high incidence of major adverse events.

Outcomes of mini-incision eversion carotid endarterectomy combined with nontouch isolation technique of the internal carotid artery.

OBJECTIVE: We developed a mini-incision eversion carotid endarterectomy (CEA) procedure (the Jikei method CEA) to prevent perioperative embolic stroke. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze perioperative and midterm outcomes after the Jikei method CEA. METHODS: We evaluated patients with the Jikei method CEA at our institution between January 2006 and June 2014. The primary end point was a major adverse event, which included death, stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and myocardial infarction, within 30 days of CEA. Secondary end points were postoperative ipsilateral stroke and restenosis. RESULTS: We retrospectively studied 120 lesions in 110 patients. The mean age was 72.2 ± 8.0 years. With regard to the 120 lesions, 56 lesions (46.7%) were symptomatic and 73 lesions (60.8%) showed ≥90% severe stenosis. The mean length of the skin incision was 3.2 ± 0.5 cm. The mean operative time, volume of blood loss, and internal carotid artery clamp time were 171.0 ± 50.7 minutes, 161.6 ± 110.8 mL, and 35.7 ± 10.8 minutes, respectively. There were three perioperative major adverse events (2.5%), including two strokes (1.7%) and one intracranial hemorrhage (0.8%) resulting from hyperperfusion syndrome. The median postoperative hospital stay was 6 days (range, 2-303 days). The mean follow-up was 3.9 ± 2.2 years. There was no case of ipsilateral stroke during the follow-up period. The freedom from ipsilateral stroke at 5 years was 98.3%. Three lesions (2.5%) developed restenosis. The freedom from restenosis was 97.2% at 5 years. The freedom from reintervention at 5 years was 99.0% because carotid artery stent placement was necessary in one patient with severe restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: The Jikei method CEA was safe and effective in preventing perioperative and midterm stroke.

Result of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Patients with Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding from the thoracic aorta is potentially fatal in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was recently applied for aortic invasion by esophageal cancer. However, only a few case reports have been published. This study was performed to clarify the effectiveness and safety of TEVAR for patients with advanced esophageal cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 18 patients who underwent TEVAR for esophageal cancer. We also performed a literature search and reviewed 21 similar cases. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2016, 10 patients were treated on an emergent basis for aortic hemorrhage (salvage group) and 8 patients underwent urgent prophylactic surgery (prophylactic group). Hemostasis was achieved in all cases. One (10%) patient in the salvage group died of aspiration pneumonia on postoperative day 1, while all patients in the prophylactic group survived for >1 month. The median survival period in the salvage and prophylactic group was 3.25 and 11.10 months, respectively. The longest survivor was still alive 9 years after TEVAR and chemoradiotherapy. No fatal adverse events or negative impacts on subsequent treatment for esophageal cancer occurred. CONCLUSIONS: TEVAR is feasible, safe, and effective in preventing fatal aortic hemorrhage secondary to esophageal cancer invasion, although it is palliative in most cases. Because the outcomes of emergent TEVAR after bleeding tended to be worse in the salvage than in prophylactic group, prophylactic TEVAR may be considered a viable treatment option for patients with aortic invasion by advanced esophageal cancer.

Concomitant Coil Embolization for Gutter Leak during Endovascular Aortic Repair with the Snorkel Technique.

Snorkel endovascular aortic repair (SEVAR) is reported to be effective for the treatment of pararenal or juxtarenal aortic aneurysms. SEVAR can be performed with an off-the-self device, which is applied for emergency cases. However, there is a concern that SEVAR lead to gutter leak due to insertion of multiple stents. Previously, we performed 2-staged treatment for gutter leak after SEVAR. However, the gutter leaks can also occur late, and it is often difficult to close. Therefore, if a significant gutter leak is identified intraoperatively, performing concomitant gutter coil embolization at the time of the initial surgery may be reasonable.