Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Aquat Toxicol ; 101(1): 207-13, 2011 Jan 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20980065

ABSTRACT

Sediments from 71 river sites in Northern Spain were tested using the oligochaete Tubifex tubifex (Annelida, Clitellata) chronic bioassay. 47 sediments were identified as reference primarily from macroinvertebrate community characteristics. The data for the toxicological endpoints were examined using non-metric MDS. Probability ellipses were constructed around the reference sites in multidimensional space to establish a classification for assessing test-sediments into one of three categories (Non Toxic, Potentially Toxic, and Toxic). The construction of such probability ellipses sets the Type I error rate. However, we also wished to include in the decision process for identifying pass-fail boundaries the degree of disturbance required to be detected, and the likelihood of being wrong in detecting that disturbance (i.e. the Type II error). Setting the ellipse size to use based on Type I error does not include any consideration of the probability of Type II error. To do this, the toxicological response observed in the reference sediments was manipulated by simulating different degrees of disturbance (simpacted sediments), and measuring the Type II error rate for each set of the simpacted sediments. From this procedure, the frequency at each probability ellipse of identifying impairment using sediments with known level of disturbance is quantified. Thirteen levels of disturbance and seven probability ellipses were tested. Based on the results the decision boundary for Non Toxic and Potentially Toxic was set at the 80% probability ellipse, and the boundary for Potentially Toxic and Toxic at the 95% probability ellipse. Using this approach, 9 test sediments were classified as Toxic, 2 as Potentially Toxic, and 13 as Non Toxic.


Subject(s)
Geologic Sediments/analysis , Geologic Sediments/classification , Metals, Heavy/analysis , Oligochaeta/drug effects , Research Design , Toxicity Tests/standards , Animals , Biological Assay , Lethal Dose 50 , Mass Spectrometry , Probability , Rivers , Spain , Spectrophotometry, Atomic , Toxicity Tests/methods
2.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf ; 72(8): 2083-9, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19720397

ABSTRACT

Acute toxicity tests were conducted to assess the sensitivity of laboratory cultured Tubifex tubifex (Annelida, Clitellata), as an intralaboratory quality assurance requirement for the test organisms used in sediment chronic bioassays. Worms were exposed to cadmium, copper, and chromium in water-only 96-h tests, in single metal exposure, over a three-year period. The lethal concentration for the x% of the exposed population (LC(x)), the No-Observable-Effect Concentration (NOEC) and the Lowest-Observable-Effect Concentration (LOEC) were estimated. Based on LC(50) values, the rank of toxicity was Cu(+2)>Cd(+2)>Cr(+6). Sensitivity remained relatively constant during the research period and was comparable with the sensitivity of the same culture stock examined more than 10 years ago. This observed consistency in sensitivity indicates that comparisons between different sediment chronic bioassays conducted during the study period, using T. tubifex worms from the same culture stock, was appropriate. It is necessary to control both worm biomass and age for the acute test in order to standardize the test-organism conditions in intralaboratory quality assurance programs.


Subject(s)
Metals, Heavy/toxicity , Oligochaeta/drug effects , Toxicity Tests, Acute/methods , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Animals , Cadmium/toxicity , Chromium/toxicity , Copper/toxicity , Models, Animal , Oligochaeta/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...