Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
1.
Rev. clín. esp. (Ed. impr.) ; 219(4): 171-176, mayo 2019. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-186527

ABSTRACT

Objetivos: Comparar la estructura, recursos y actividad de las Unidades de Medicina Interna (UMI) del Sistema Nacional de Salud (SNS) en 2013 y 2016. Analizar las diferencias entre UMI en 2016 por tamaño de hospital. Material y métodos: Comparativa de 2 estudios descriptivos transversales de UMI en hospitales generales de agudos del Sistema Nacional de Salud con datos referidos a 2013 y a 2016. Las variables fueron recogidas mediante un cuestionario «ad hoc» (encuesta RECALMIN). Resultados: Entre 2013 y 2016 aumentó notablemente la demanda asistencial (con un promedio anual del 11% en altas de hospitalización y del 16% en primeras consultas) y ligeramente la comorbilidad (2%). En el mismo período, aumentó un 16,7% la productividad media de las UMI (0,6+0,3 vs. 0,7+0,3; p=0,09) y la estancia media disminuyó un 10% (9+2,2 vs. 8,1+2,1 días; p=0,001). Los progresos en la implantación de buenas prácticas y de una atención sistemática al paciente crónico complejo fueron escasos. La variabilidad entre UMI y las notables diferencias entre UMI de hospitales de tamaño distinto fueron hallazgos de ambas encuestas. Conclusiones: Las UMI respondieron al aumento de la carga asistencial que soportaron en el período 2013-2016 mejorando su eficiencia y productividad, pero los avances en la implantación de buenas prácticas, incluyendo la atención al paciente crónico complejo, fueron escasos. La importante variabilidad en los indicadores de estructura, actividad y modelos de gestión encontrada en 2013 se mantuvo en 2016


Objectives: To compare the structure, resources and activity of the internal medicine units (IMUs) of the Spanish National Health System (SNHS) in 2013 and 2016. To analyse the differences between IMUs in 2016 by hospital size. Material and methods: We conducted a comparison of 2 descriptive cross-sectional studies of IMUs in general acute care hospitals of the Spanish National Health System, with data referring to 2013 and 2016. The variables were collected via an ad hoc questionnaire (RECALMIN survey). Results: Between 2013 and 2016, the demand for care increased dramatically (with an annual average of 11% in hospital discharges and 16% in first consultations), and comorbidity slightly increased (2%). During this period, the mean productivity of IMUs increased 16.7% (0.6±0.3 vs. 0.7±0.3; P=.09), and the mean stay decreased 10% (9±2.2 vs. 8.1±2.1 days; P=.001). Progress in implementing good practices and systematic care for complex chronic patients was scarce. Both surveys found variability among IMUs and marked differences among IMUs of hospitals of different sizes. Conclusions: IMUs responded to the increased burden of care they supported during 2013-2016 by improving their efficiency and productivity; however, advances in implementing good practices, including care for chronic complex patients, were scare. The significant variability in the indicators of structure, activity and management models found in 2013 remained in 2016


Subject(s)
Humans , Internal Medicine/organization & administration , National Health Systems/organization & administration , Quality Indicators, Health Care/trends , Health Care Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Models, Organizational , Hospital Statistics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data
2.
Rev Clin Esp (Barc) ; 219(4): 171-176, 2019 May.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30808505

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the structure, resources and activity of the internal medicine units (IMUs) of the Spanish National Health System (SNHS) in 2013 and 2016. To analyse the differences between IMUs in 2016 by hospital size. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a comparison of 2 descriptive cross-sectional studies of IMUs in general acute care hospitals of the Spanish National Health System, with data referring to 2013 and 2016. The variables were collected via an ad hoc questionnaire (RECALMIN survey). RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2016, the demand for care increased dramatically (with an annual average of 11% in hospital discharges and 16% in first consultations), and comorbidity slightly increased (2%). During this period, the mean productivity of IMUs increased 16.7% (0.6±0.3 vs. 0.7±0.3; P=.09), and the mean stay decreased 10% (9±2.2 vs. 8.1±2.1 days; P=.001). Progress in implementing good practices and systematic care for complex chronic patients was scarce. Both surveys found variability among IMUs and marked differences among IMUs of hospitals of different sizes. CONCLUSIONS: IMUs responded to the increased burden of care they supported during 2013-2016 by improving their efficiency and productivity; however, advances in implementing good practices, including care for chronic complex patients, were scare. The significant variability in the indicators of structure, activity and management models found in 2013 remained in 2016.

3.
Rev. clín. esp. (Ed. impr.) ; 217(6): 342-350, ago.-sept. 2017. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-165067

ABSTRACT

La mortalidad precoz en pacientes con tromboembolia pulmonar (TEP) varía desde el 2% en pacientes normotensos al 30% en pacientes con shock cardiogénico. La estratificación actual de riesgo en la TEP sintomática incluye 4 grupos de pacientes y las estrategias terapéuticas recomendadas se basan en dicha estratificación. Los pacientes que se presentan con inestabilidad hemodinámica se consideran de alto riesgo y en ellos se recomienda el tratamiento fibrinolítico. En pacientes normotensos, la estratificación de riesgo ayuda a diferenciar entre aquellos de bajo riesgo, riesgo intermedio-bajo y riesgo intermedio-alto. Actualmente no existe suficiente evidencia sobre el beneficio de una monitorización intensiva y tratamiento fibrinolítico en pacientes con riesgo intermedio-alto. En pacientes de bajo riesgo, está indicada la anticoagulación estándar y podría considerarse la posibilidad de un alta precoz con manejo ambulatorio, aunque su beneficio no está todavía firmemente establecido (AU)


Early mortality in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) varies from 2% in normotensive patients to 30% in patients with cardiogenic shock. The current risk stratification for symptomatic PTE includes 4 patient groups, and the recommended therapeutic strategies are based on this stratification. Patients who have haemodynamic instability are considered at high risk. Fibrinolytic treatment is recommended for these patients. In normotensive patients, risk stratification helps differentiate between those of low risk, intermediate-low risk and intermediate-high risk. There is currently insufficient evidence on the benefit of intensive monitoring and fibrinolytic treatment in patients with intermediate-high risk. For low-risk patients, standard anticoagulation is indicated. Early discharge with outpatient management may be considered, although its benefit has still not been firmly established (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Pulmonary Embolism/complications , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnosis , Survivorship/physiology , Risk , Biomarkers/analysis , Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Prognosis , Shock, Cardiogenic/complications , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/standards , Hypotension/complications , Pulmonary Embolism/therapy
4.
Rev Clin Esp (Barc) ; 217(6): 342-350, 2017.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28476246

ABSTRACT

Early mortality in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) varies from 2% in normotensive patients to 30% in patients with cardiogenic shock. The current risk stratification for symptomatic PTE includes 4 patient groups, and the recommended therapeutic strategies are based on this stratification. Patients who have haemodynamic instability are considered at high risk. Fibrinolytic treatment is recommended for these patients. In normotensive patients, risk stratification helps differentiate between those of low risk, intermediate-low risk and intermediate-high risk. There is currently insufficient evidence on the benefit of intensive monitoring and fibrinolytic treatment in patients with intermediate-high risk. For low-risk patients, standard anticoagulation is indicated. Early discharge with outpatient management may be considered, although its benefit has still not been firmly established.

5.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 11(3): 172-7, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19293055

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility, concerning compliance to protocol and recommended clinical practice guidelines, as well as efficacy results of multidisciplinary treatment (surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy) of resectable rectal cancer in a third-level hospital devoid of radiotherapy and clinical oncology units. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective, single-institution analysis was completed for 45 consecutive patients diagnosed with resectable rectal cancer who entered an officially proposed multidisciplinary treatment protocol from October 1998 to September 2003. Adequacy of patient inclusion, according to clinical stage, was reviewed. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy schedule, surgery procedures and adjuvant chemotherapy indication were assessed. All treatment time intervals were analysed. Finally, efficacy results are discussed and contextualised by comparison with results of clinical trials which support this treatment strategy. RESULTS: According to an independent board review, 3 patients (6.7%) with stage I rectal cancer, 31 patients (68.9%) with stage II and 11 patients (24.4%) with stage III rectal cancer were included. Radiotherapy dosage, volume and schedule were as planned. Median time from diagnosis to start of radiotherapy was 26.36 days (24.26- 28.57; CI 95%). Median duration of radiotherapy was 6.00 days (5.56-6.44; CI 95%). Median time from start of radiotherapy to surgery was 15.67 days (14.47-16.87; CI 95%). Median time from completion of radiotherapy to surgery was 10.67 days (9.53-11.81; CI 95%). Most of the patients underwent low anterior resection [23 patients (51.2%)] and abdominoperineal resection [16 patients (35.6%)]. Correlation between clinical and pathologic staging was as expected. Twenty-nine patients (64.4%) of the 45 that were initially included started adjuvant chemotherapy. A statistically significant relationship between pathologic stage (grouped I-II vs. III) and the use of adjuvant chemotherapy was found (p=0.033; chi-square test). Radiotherapy- and chemotherapy-induced toxicity did not differ from that previously reported. With a median follow-up of 65.46 months, a total of 10 recurrences have been diagnosed, all of them in stage III patients. Overall survival rate at five years was 76% for the complete population included. CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary treatment of resectable rectal cancer in a third-level hospital is feasible. Although efficacy results are comparable to those previously reported in the literature, further improvements in clinical staging as well as in adjuvant chemotherapy indication are desirable.


Subject(s)
Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Neoplasm Staging , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Rate
6.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 11(3): 172-177, mar. 2009. tab, ilus
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-123597

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility, concerning compliance to protocol and recommended clinical practice guidelines, as well as efficacy results of multidisciplinary treatment (surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy) of resectable rectal cancer in a third-level hospital devoid of radiotherapy and clinical oncology units. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective, single-institution analysis was completed for 45 consecutive patients diagnosed with resectable rectal cancer who entered an officially proposed multidisciplinary treatment protocol from October 1998 to September 2003. Adequacy of patient inclusion, according to clinical stage, was reviewed. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy schedule, surgery procedures and adjuvant chemotherapy indication were assessed. All treatment time intervals were analysed. Finally, efficacy results are discussed and contextualised by comparison with results of clinical trials which support this treatment strategy. RESULTS: According to an independent board review, 3 patients (6.7%) with stage I rectal cancer, 31 patients (68.9%) with stage II and 11 patients (24.4%) with stage III rectal cancer were included. Radiotherapy dosage, volume and schedule were as planned. Median time from diagnosis to start of radiotherapy was 26.36 days (24.26- 28.57; CI 95%). Median duration of radiotherapy was 6.00 days (5.56-6.44; CI 95%). Median time from start of radiotherapy to surgery was 15.67 days (14.47-16.87; CI 95%). Median time from completion of radiotherapy to surgery was 10.67 days (9.53-11.81; CI 95%). Most of the patients underwent low anterior resection [23 patients (51.2%)] and abdominoperineal resection [16 patients (35.6%)]. Correlation between clinical and pathologic staging was as expected. Twenty-nine patients (64.4%) of the 45 that were initially included started adjuvant chemotherapy. A statistically significant relationship between pathologic stage (grouped I-II vs. III) and the use of adjuvant chemotherapy was found (p=0.033; chi-square test). Radiotherapy- and chemotherapy-induced toxicity did not differ from that previously reported. With a median follow-up of 65.46 months, a total of 10 recurrences have been diagnosed, all of them in stage III patients. Overall survival rate at five years was 76% for the complete population included. CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary treatment of resectable rectal cancer in a third-level hospital is feasible. Although efficacy results are comparable to those previously reported in the literature, further improvements in clinical staging as well as in adjuvant chemotherapy indication are desirable (AU)


No disponible


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Medical Oncology/methods , Medical Oncology/statistics & numerical data , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectum/pathology , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy , Longitudinal Studies , Neoplasm Staging/methods , Neoplasm Staging
10.
J Infect ; 37(3): 213-6, 1998 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9892523

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical presentation of HIV disease in older patients. METHODS: In the period 1989-1996 we reviewed the medical records of 100 patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection aged 50 years or older and, 197 controls among HIV-infected patients aged 15-40 years, who attended six institutions in the autonomous community of Valencia (Spain). RESULTS: Older patients were mostly males (86%), men who have sex with men (42%) or unknown (20%) as exposure categories. Older patients had lower CD4 cell counts/mm3 (163+/-136 vs. 450+/-373, P= 0.008), and had AIDS at first evaluation (49% vs. 29%, P = 0.0006) compared with younger patients. For patients presenting with AIDS at HIV infection diagnosis, type and frequency of AIDS indicator diseases did not differ between older and younger patients. CONCLUSION: Studies on clues for early detection of HIV infection in patients aged 50 years or older are urgently needed to improve the health care in this population.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/diagnosis , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/complications , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/complications , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/diagnosis , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Female , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Homosexuality, Male , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Spain/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL