Non-alcoholic fatty pancreas disease and pancreatic exocrine insufficiency: pilot study and systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty pancreas disease (NAFPD) is estimated as 2-46% among patients without known pancreatic diseases. An association between NAFPD and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been proposed, as well as an association between NAFPD and pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed NAFLD were included in the study. The control group consisted of individuals included in a surveillance screening program. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pancreas was performed in all patients and fat measurement was made using 2-point Dixon imaging. Fecal elastase-1 (FE-1) was performed to evaluate pancreatic exocrine function. Additionally, a 13C-mixed triglyceride breath test (13 C-MTG-BT) was performed in patients with FE-1 < 200 µg/g. RESULTS: Imaging signs of NAFPD were present in 17 (71%) patients; 11 (85%) from the NAFLD group and 6 (55%) from the control group. FE-1 < 200 µg/g was found in six (25%) patients (four in the NAFLD group and two in the control group); however, none of them had clinical symptoms of PEI. Therefore, in five out of six patients with low FE-1, a 13C-MTG-BT was performed, showing normal results (>20.9%) in all tested patients. Furthermore, the serum nutritional panel was normal in all patients with low FE-1. A systematic review identified five studies relevant to the topic. CONCLUSION: NAFPD was found in 85% of patients with NAFLD and in 55% of control patients. We did not diagnose PEI in either group. A literature review showed PEI in 9-56% of patients with NAFPD.

Immunoglobulin G subtypes-1 and 2 differentiate immunoglobulin G4-associated sclerosing cholangitis from primary sclerosing cholangitis.

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune pancreatitis is a special form of chronic pancreatitis with strong lymphocytic infiltration and two histopathological distinct subtypes, a lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis and idiopathic duct centric pancreatitis. Immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis may be present at the time of autoimmune pancreatitis type 1 diagnosis or occur later over the course of the disease. Immunoglobulin G4 is considered reliable but not an ideal marker for diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis type 1 with reported sensitivity between 71-81%. It is essential to differentiate sclerosing cholangitis with autoimmune pancreatitis from primary sclerosing cholangitis as the treatment and prognosis of the two diseases are totally different. It was the aim of the study to find a marker for immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis that would distinguish it from primary sclerosing cholangitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with autoimmune pancreatitis at our outpatient clinic. Patients from the primary sclerosing cholangitis registry were taken as a control group. Blood samples for the measurement of immunoglobulin subclasses were analysed at the time of diagnosis. RESULTS: Patients with autoimmune pancreatitis and immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis had higher values of immunoglobulin G2 when compared to autoimmune pancreatitis alone or primary sclerosing cholangitis with a high specificity (97%) and high positive predictive value (91%). In patients with normal or low immunoglobulin G2 or immunoglobulin G4, a high level of immunoglobulin G1 indicated primary sclerosing cholangitis. CONCLUSION: Immunoglobulin G1 and immunoglobulin G2 can distinguish patients with immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis from those with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Pancreatic tuberculosis: A systematic review of symptoms, diagnosis and treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Although pancreatic tuberculosis (TB) is traditionally considered to be a rare clinical entity, in recent times, an increase in the number of reports of pancreatic TB has been noted. We conducted a systematic review in order to summarise currently available data on pancreatic TB. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of Medline, Scopus and ISI Web of Science databases was conducted in order to identify papers reporting cases of pancreatic TB. The eligibility criteria for inclusion in the review required that the studies reported patient(s) affected by pancreatic TB and that individual data on age, sex, clinical presentation and outcome were available. RESULTS: In total, 116 studies reporting data on 166 patients were included in the analysis. The majority of patients were males (62.1%) diagnosed at a mean age of 41.61 ± 13.95 years. Most cases were diagnosed in Asia (50.0%), followed by North America (22.9%), Europe (20.5%), Africa (4.2%) and South America (2.4%). Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection was diagnosed in 25.3% of those affected. Pancreatic TB most frequently presented itself in the form of a pancreatic mass (79.5%) localised mainly in the head (59.0%) and less frequently in the body (18.2%) and tail (13.4%). Extrapancreatic TB involvement most frequently affected the peripancreatic lymph nodes (47.3%). More than half of patients (55.2%) were subjected to laparotomy, while 21.08% underwent endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration biopsy. The presence of TB was identified most frequently through histological analysis (59.6%), followed by culture (28.9%), staining (27.7%) and, in a smaller number, by polymerase chain reaction (9.6%) and cytology (6.6%). Almost all patients received anti-tubercular pharmacological therapy (98.2%), while 24.1% underwent surgery. Despite treatment, 8.7% of patients died. CONCLUSION: Increased awareness of pancreatic TB is needed, not only in endemic areas but especially in relation to HIV infection and other clinical conditions associated with immunoincompetence.