ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: In our series of patients with congenital vascular malformations (CVMs) we investigate the preoperative factors for predicting major haemorrhage at surgery and propose an algorithm for their surgical management. DESIGN: This is a partly prospective case series of patients with severe symptoms/complications due to CVMs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected on 73 consecutive procedures in 41 patients with CVMs from 1992 to 2006 at a large university hospital and the association of following factors with blood loss during the procedure were investigated: type of procedure, possibility of proximal tourniquet use, lesion flow characteristics, previous history of major haemorrhage with CVM surgery, platelet counts and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Significantly higher blood loss was associated with debulking surgery (p=0.006) and with previous history of major haemorrhage during CVM surgery, (p=0.041). Blood loss was higher in lesions where proximal tourniquet application was not possible (p=0.093). High-flow lesions were not strongly associated with major blood loss (p=0.288). Major blood loss (>2l) occurred in 16 (20.8%) procedures performed on 11 (26.2%) patients, but this did not prolong hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Surgery can potentially improve morbidity/mortality in patients with life/limb-threatening complications or severe symptoms due to CVMs, providing they are managed in multidisciplinary specialised centres.
Subject(s)
Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Vascular Malformations/surgery , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Adult , Algorithms , Blood Transfusion , Clinical Protocols , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Platelet Count , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Reoperation , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Tourniquets , Vascular Malformations/complications , Vascular Malformations/diagnosis , Young AdultABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to analyze the indication and results of open pancreatic drainage by celiostomy in severe necrotizing pancreatitis (SNP). 44 patients with SNP were treated surgically by open lesser-omental sac drainage (celiostomy) in the last nine years (1989-1997). They were classified into three groups according to date (timing) of celiostomy: a group of 23 patients with early celiostomy (in the first week after the onset of pancreatitis); second group of 11 patients with celiostomy in the second and third week after SNP; the third group of 10 patients with late celiostomy (4-12 weeks after pancreatitis). Drainage procedure consisted in marsupialization of lesser omental sac by suturing open gastrocolic ligament to anterior peritoneum, with drains inserted via celiostomy. The indications of celiostomy in the first group were: diagnostic laparotomy for unknown acute abdomen (18 patients), severe acute cholecystitis (1 patient), common bile duct stones (2 patients), persistent MOSF (1 patient). The necrosectomy was technically possible only in eight patients (34.7%) at date of laparotomy. Postoperative infection of necrosis occurred in seven patients (30.4%) and nine patients died postoperatively (39.1%) because of aggravated MOSF. In the second group, celiostomy was carried out for extensive sterile (2 patients) or infected necrosis (9 patients). Good results were obtained in 9 patients and two patients with infected necrosis died postoperatively. In the third group late celiostomy was performed for treatment of the pancreatic abscess, with good results in all patients (0% mortality). In conclusion, celiostomy is drainage procedure of choice for patients with extensive infected pancreatic necrosis or pancreatic abscesses and stable biologic condition. It facilitates intermittent debridements of residual necrosis and purulent foci, without relaparotomies. Early celiostomy is not recommended as it is proved ineffective (nondemarcated necrosis) and may cause aggravation of SNP or exogenous infections of necrosis.