The introduction of surgical simulation on three-dimensional-printed models in the cardiac surgery curriculum: an experimental project.

AIMS: Training in congenital cardiac surgery has become more and more difficult because of the reduced opportunities for trainees in the operating room and the high patient anatomical variability. The aim of this study was to perform a pilot evaluation of surgical simulation on a simple 3D-printed heart model in training of young surgeons and its potential inclusion in the curriculum of residency programs. METHODS: A group of 11 residents performed a surgical correction of aortic coarctation using a 3D-printed surgical model. After teaching the surgical procedure, a simulation was performed twice, at different times, and was evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively by a senior surgeon. A 3D model-based training program was then developed and incorporated into our cardiac surgery training program. RESULTS: A significant improvement in surgical technique was observed between the first and second surgical simulations: median of 65% [interquartile range (IQR) = 61-70%] vs. 83% (IQR = 82-91%, P < 0.001). The median time required to run the simulation was significantly shorter during the second simulation: 39 min (IQR = 33-40) vs. 45 min (IQR = 37-48; P = 0.02). Regarding the simulation program, a basic and an advanced program were developed, including a total of 40 different simulated procedures divided into 12 sessions. CONCLUSION: Surgical simulation using 3D-printing technology can be an extremely valuable tool to improve surgical training in congenital heart disease. Our pilot study can represent the first step towards the creation of an integrated training system on 3D-printed models of congenital and acquired heart diseases in other Italian residency programs.

Applications of Three-Dimensional Printing in the Management of Complex Aortic Diseases.

The use of three-dimensional (3D) printing is gaining considerable success in many medical fields, including surgery; however, the spread of this innovation in cardiac and vascular surgery is still limited. This article reports our pilot experience with this technology, applied as an additional tool for 20 patients treated for complex vascular or cardiac surgical diseases. We have analyzed the feasibility of a "3D printing and aortic diseases project," which helps to obtain a more complete approach to these conditions. 3D models have been used as a resource to improve preoperative planning and simulation, both for open and endovascular procedures; furthermore, real 3D aortic models were used to develop doctor-patients communication, allowing better knowledge and awareness of their disease and of the planned surgical procedure. A 3D printing project seems feasible and applicable as an adjunctive tool in the diagnostic-therapeutic path of complex aortic diseases, with the need for future studies to verify the results.

Case Report: Severe Aortic Valve Regurgitation and Pseudoaneurysm in Aortic Valve-Sparing Operation: The Usefulness of Multimodality Imaging in a Complex Clinical Scenario.

Background: Failure of the native aortic valve and degenerative anatomy of ascending aorta in patients with previous Tirone-David operation may represent a clinical challenge, because sometimes the risk of reoperation is prohibitive. Case: We described the case of a patient suffering from severe aortic valve regurgitation and pseudoaneurysm of the aortic arch, 6 years after cardiac surgery operation. The aim of this clinical case was to assess if the complex anatomy of aortic pseudoaneurysm and aortic root geometry can be accurately reproduced from contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan into a three-dimensional (3D) printed model. Based on this procedural method, with the aid of transesophageal 3D ultrasound, we efficaciously treated the patient percutaneously with a combination of transcatheter occluder device plus microcoil embolization and transfemoral aortic valve implantation. The patient was free from complications and the need to redo cardiac surgery. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of two simultaneous complications and their staged treatment in a patient with previous aortic valve-sparing operation. This is a useful report in a single 3D model applying such specific technology to these two simultaneous clinical settings.

Redo After Failure of Aortic Homografts With a Rapid Deployment Valve.

Homograft implantation in the aortic position was a common approach for full root aortic surgical procedures in the early 2000s. Reintervention after degeneration of such homografts remains a challenge. We report two cases of successful implantation of the Edwards Intuity Elite rapid deployment valve into patients with degeneration of existing aortic homograft implants leading to severe aortic regurgitation.

Can the left subclavian artery revascularization during aortic arch surgery be managed using the in situ left internal mammary artery?

The management of the left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization during aortic arch surgery is controversial and often challenging, especially during an emergency life-saving procedure. We report on a case of a 64-year old man, admitted to our institution with a Type A acute aortic dissection who underwent a frozen elephant trunk procedure with debranching of the supra-aortic vessels completed with an LSA revascularization using the in situ left internal mammary artery.

Results of surgical aortic valve replacement and transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the results of aortic valve replacement through sternotomic approach in redo scenarios (RAVR) vs transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), in patients in the eighth decade of life or older already undergone previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: One hundred and twenty-six patients undergoing RAVR were compared with 113 patients undergoing TaTAVR in terms of 30-day mortality and Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 outcomes. The two groups were also analysed after propensity-matching. RESULTS: TaTAVR patients demonstrated a higher incidence of 30-day mortality (P = 0.03), stroke (P = 0.04), major bleeding (P = 0.03), worse 'early safety' (P = 0.04) and lower permanent pacemaker implantation (P = 0.03). TaTAVR had higher follow-up hazard in all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 3.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28-6.62; P < 0.01] and cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.02-4.88; P = 0.04). Propensity-matched patients showed comparable 30-day outcome in terms of survival, major morbidity and early safety, with only a lower incidence of transfusions after TaTAVR (10.7% vs RAVR: 57.1%; P < 0.01). A trend towards lower Acute Kidney Injury Network Classification 2/3 (3.6% vs RAVR 21.4%; P = 0.05) and towards a lower freedom from all-cause mortality at follow-up (TaTAVR: 44.3 ± 21.3% vs RAVR: 86.6 ± 9.3%; P = .08) was demonstrated after TaTAVR, although cardiovascular mortality was comparable (TaTAVR: 86.5 ± 9.7% vs RAVR: 95.2 ± 4.6%; P = 0.52). Follow-up freedom from stroke, acute heart failure, reintervention on AVR and thrombo-embolisms were comparable (P = NS). EuroSCORE II (P = 0.02), perioperative stroke (P = 0.01) and length of hospitalization (P = 0.02) were the determinants of all-cause mortality at follow-up, whereas perioperative stroke (P = 0.03) and length of hospitalization (P = 0.04) impacted cardiovascular mortality at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Reported differences in mortality and morbidity after TaTAVR and RAVR reflect differences in baseline risk profiles. Given the lower trend for renal complications, patients at higher perioperative renal risk might be better served by TaTAVR.

Aortic Valve Replacement in Redo-Scenarios: A Comparison Between Traditional Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) and Transapical-TAVR from Two Real-World Multicenter Registries.

BACKGROUND: The study aim was to compare the outcome of transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TaTAVR) and traditional aortic valve replacement (AVR) in redo from two real-world registries. METHODS: The 30-day and follow up outcome of 462 patients enrolled in two multicenter redo registries, treated with redo-AVR (RAVR; n = 292 patients) or TaTAVR (n = 170 patients), were analyzed according to VARC-2 criteria, stratified also by propensity-matching analysis. RESULTS: TaTAVR-patients were older and sicker than RAVR patients, and reported a higher all-cause 30-day mortality (p <0.01), a higher risk for all-cause mortality (p = 0.006) and cardiovascular mortality (p = 0.05) at follow up, but similar 30-day cardiovascular mortality (p = 0.12). Prolonged intubation (p <0.01) and Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) 2/3 p = 0.02) prevailed in RAVR. TaTAVR patients reported a higher level of major/life-threatening/disabling bleeding (p <0.01) and 'early safety-events' (ES) (p = 0.04). Thirty-day acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, and follow up freedom from acute heart failure (AHF), from stroke and from reinterventions were similar (p = NS). The NYHA class was better after RAVR (p <0.01). The intermediate-to-high risk (Logistic EuroSCORE RAVR 17.1 ± 8.5; TaTAVR 16.0 ± 17.0) propensity-matched population demonstrated comparable 30-day and follow up all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, ES, AMI, stroke, prolonged intubation, follow up freedom from AHF, from stroke and from reinterventions and NYHA class. TaTAVR still reported lower levels of AKIN 2/3 (2.2% versus 15.6%, p = 0.03) and shorter hospitalization (9.5 ± 3.4 days versus 12.0 ± 7.0 days, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Outcome differences between RAVR and TaTAVR in redo-scenarios reflect methodological differences and different baseline risk profiles. Propensity-matched patients showed a better renal outcome after TaTAVR. *Drs. Onorati and D'Onofrio contributed equally to this article and should both be considered as first authors.

When does transapical aortic valve replacement become a futile procedure? An analysis from a national registry.

OBJECTIVES: Patient selection is crucial to achieve good outcomes and to avoid futile procedures in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. The aim of this multicenter retrospective study was to identify independent predictors of 1-year mortality in patients surviving after transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Italian registry of transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement that includes patients undergoing operation in 21 centers from 2007 to 2012. Futility was defined as mortality within 1 year after transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients surviving at 30 days. Thirty-day survivors were divided in 2 groups: futility (group F) and nonfutility (group NF). Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of futility. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 645 patients with survival of 30 days or more after transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Groups F and NF included 60 patients (10.8%) and 585 patients (89.2%), respectively. Patients in group F were more likely to have insulin-dependent diabetes (15% vs 7.2%, P = .03), creatinine 2.0 mg/dL or greater or dialysis (18.3% vs 8.2%, P = .01), logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation greater than 20% (66.7% vs 50.3%, P = .02), preoperative rhythm disorders (40% vs 25.3%, P = .03), critical preoperative state (8.3% vs 1.8%, P = .002), and left ventricular ejection fraction less than 30% (15% vs 2.9%, P < .001). The multivariate analysis identified the following as independent predictors of futility: insulin-dependent diabetes (odds ratio, 3.1; P = .003), creatinine 2.0 mg/dL or greater or dialysis (odds ratio, 2.52; P = .012), preoperative rhythm disorders (odds ratio, 1.88; P = .04), and left ventricular ejection fraction less than 30% (odds ratio, 4.34; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: According to our data, among patients undergoing transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement, those with insulin-dependent diabetes, advanced chronic kidney disease, rhythm disorders, and low left ventricular ejection fraction have a higher risk to undergo futile procedures.

Clinical and hemodynamic outcomes after aortic valve replacement with stented and stentless pericardial xenografts: a propensity-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Pericardial aortic xenografts have demonstrated excellent durability, and also freedom from tissue failure and from endocarditis. The aim of this single-center propensity-matched study was to compare the clinical and hemodynamic results of aortic valve replacement (AVR) with that for stented and stentless pericardial bioprostheses. METHODS: A total of 111 consecutive AVRs with the Perimount Magna stented valve, performed between December 2002 and December 2007, and 150 consecutive AVRs with the Pericarbon Freedom stentless bioprosthesis, performed between July 1999 and December 2007, was reviewed. Based on a propensity-score analysis, 81 matched pairs were created. The mean age of the 162 patients was 74 +/- 7 years. In total, 31 (38%) and 39 (48%) associated procedures were performed in the stented and stentless groups, respectively (p = 0.20). The mean follow up for stented-valve patients was 20 +/- 9 months (range: 6-35 months), and for stentless-valve patients was 36 +/- 21 months (range: 6-83 months) (p < 0.05). RESULTS: The operative mortality was 4.9% (n = 4) and 6.2% (n = 5) (p = 0.77) in the stented- and stentless-valve groups, respectively. The cumulative actuarial freedom from structural valve deterioration, non-structural dysfunction, reoperation, prosthetic valve endocarditis, hemorrhage and thromboembolic events after 24 months were 98.4 +/- 1.5% and 96.4 +/- 2.6% (p = 0.12) for the stented- and stentless-valve groups, respectively; the actuarial survival rates after 24 months were 82.6 +/- 5.2% and 83.8 +/- 4.3% (p = 0.82), respectively, while freedom from valve-related death was 98.4 +/- 1.5% and 97.2 +/- 1.9% (p = 0.56), respectively. No statistically significant differences were identified between the peak and mean transaortic gradients. CONCLUSION: Both, the stented and stentless pericardial aortic xenografts provided good clinical and hemodynamic results. However, the study results failed to demonstrate any difference regarding early outcomes between the two groups.

Post-traumatic rupture of the anterolateral papillary muscle.

Rupture of cardiac valves as a consequence of nonpenetrating cardiac trauma is an uncommon phenomenon. We report the case of a 24-year-old patient with a "two-stage" traumatic rupture of the anterolateral papillary muscle of the mitral valve, after a blunt chest trauma, who successfully underwent emergency mitral valve replacement.

Endovascular treatment of aberrant right subclavian (lusorian) artery to oesophagus fistula: a case report.

The creation of a fistula between the subclavian artery and the oesophagus is extremely rare. All the reported cases of subclavian oesophagus-arterial fistulae have been described either in aberrant subclavian arteries or as caused by foreign bodies in the oesophagus. In this article, a case of fistulous communication between an aberrant right subclavian and the oesophagus managed with the positioning of endovascular prosthesis is presented.

Intraoperative coronary angiography in postinfarction ventricular free wall rupture: how technology can change diagnostic and therapeutic timing.

Left ventricular free wall rupture often presents with an abrupt onset and rapidly progresses towards cardiogenic shock or electromechanical dissociation. The diagnostic pathway is still a matter of debate: echocardiography is commonly decisive but the assessment of coronary artery status is essential in order to optimize the surgical procedure. However, a preoperative coronary angiography could generate a dramatic delay of surgery. We report a case of a patient with a post-infarction left ventricular free wall rupture presenting with cardiac tamponade and cardiogenic shock who underwent emergency surgery. After cardiopulmonary bypass institution, an intraoperative coronary angiography was performed. Successful repair of the ventricular free wall rupture associated with a well-targeted surgical myocardial revascularization were carried out. This case illustrates how the development of technologically advanced hybrid operating rooms could lead to a new diagnostic and therapeutic approach to this potentially fatal complication.

Aortic valve replacement with the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless prosthesis: 7 years' experience in 130 patients.

OBJECTIVES: Aortic stentless pericardial valves were introduced into clinical practice to combine properties of both stentless and pericardial prostheses. The aim of this single-center retrospective study was to assess midterm clinical and hemodynamic results of aortic valve replacement with the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless bioprosthesis. METHODS: From July 1999 through November 2005, 130 consecutive patients (73 [56.1%] male patients) underwent aortic valve replacement with the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom bioprosthesis at our institution. Mean age was 76 +/- 5 years (range, 42-86 years), and associated procedures were performed in 50 (38.4%) patients; of these, 41 were coronary artery bypass grafts. Surgical intervention under urgent/emergency conditions and reoperations were performed in 18 (13.8%) and 7 (5.3%) patients, respectively. Mean crossclamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 82 +/- 24 and 125 +/- 40 minutes, respectively. All patients underwent clinical and echocardiographic follow-up (100% complete), and the total cumulative follow-up was 324 patient/years (mean, 2.5 +/- 1.8; range, 6 months-7 years). RESULTS: Overall hospital mortality was 8.4%. Overall patient survival was 63% +/- 6% and 50% +/- 10% at 5 and 7 years, respectively. Late deaths occurred in 23 patients, and 6 of them were valve related (1.8% patient/years). Freedom from valve-related death and reoperation was 91% +/- 4% and 94% +/- 4%, respectively, at 7 years. No structural valve deterioration was observed. Endocarditis, thromboembolism, and hemorrhagic complications occurred in 2 (0.6% patient/years), 1 (0.3% patient/years), and 1 (0.3% patient/years) patients, respectively. Mean transprosthetic gradients for valve sizes 23, 25, and 27 were 12.1 +/- 3.8, 10.8 +/- 3.8, and 9 +/- 3.1 mm Hg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless bioprosthesis provides good early and midterm results in terms of hemodynamic performance, survival, and freedom from valve-related complications.

Long-term results of aortic valve replacement with Edwards Prima Plus stentless bioprosthesis: eleven years' follow up.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The Edwards Lifesciences Prima Plus stentless valve (ELSV) is a bioprosthesis manufactured from a porcine aortic root. The study aim was to evaluate late clinical outcomes after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with ELSV implanted as a miniroot in patients with aortic valve disease. METHODS: Between 1993 and 2004, 318 patients (232 males, 86 females; mean age 69 +/- 9 years; range: 37-83 years) underwent AVR with the ELSV. Preoperatively, 102 patients (32%), 162 (51%) and 54 (17%) were in NYHA classes I/II, III and IV, respectively. Aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation and combined lesions were present in 124 patients (39%), 114 (36%) and 41 (13%), respectively. Twenty patients (6%) were referred for an acute aortic dissection, 20 (6%) for an aortic root aneurysm, and 139 (44%) had an associated aneurysmal dilatation of the ascending aorta. The ascending aorta was replaced in 159 patients (50%); aortic arch replacement was required in 10 (3%). Coronary artery bypass graft was performed in 86 patients (27%). The follow up was based on clinical data. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 5% (n = 17). There were 49 late deaths (5.2%/pt-yr). Valve-related mortality occurred in 10 patients (1%/pt-yr). Actuarial survival at five and 10 years was 78% and 33%, respectively. Actuarial freedom from valve reoperation and structural valve deterioration at 10 years were 100% and 64%. Actuarial freedom from embolic events and endocarditis at 10 years were 84% and 81%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The ELSV, when implanted as a miniroot, provided good early and long-term results in terms of survival and freedom from major complications.

Repair of ascending aorta pseudoaneurysm without circulatory arrest in redo patient.

A pseudoaneurysm of the ascending aorta is an unusual and potentially fatal complication after aortic surgical operations. TEE and CT scan are the investigations of choice. Surgical treatment is mandatory. We describe the successful management of a pseudoaneurysm of the ascending aorta, with aorto-sternal-cutaneous fistula requiring right axillary and femoral artery cannulation with Remote Access Perfusion(R) aortic cannula (Estech(R), California, USA). Behaving like this we avoid hypotermic circulatory arrest, provide safe reentry and prevent an impending rupture.

Suitability of stentless bioprostheses for combined replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta.

BACKGROUND: The Edwards Prima stentless valve (EPSV) is a bioprosthesis made of the porcine aortic root which, owing to its versatility, may be implanted with different techniques depending on the underlying disease. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the usefulness of the EPSV implanted as a miniroot in patients with disease of the aortic valve and ascending aorta. METHODS: Between January 1998 and July 2002, 91 patients (mean age 67 +/- 7 years) underwent combined replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta with an EPSV for aortic stenosis (n = 12), incompetence (n = 45) or mixed disease (n = 26); all had aneurysmal dilation of the ascending aorta and 8 had an acute aortic dissection. The EPSV was implanted using the miniroot (or inclusion) technique and by extending the aorta with a tubular graft; aortic arch replacement was required in 5 patients. Hospital survivors underwent clinical and echocardiographic follow-up at 6 and 12 months and yearly thereafter. RESULTS: The hospital mortality was 11% (10 patients). Causes of death included stroke (n = 3), septic shock (n = 3), myocardial infarction (n = 2), and low output syndrome (n = 2). The mean follow-up of the 81 discharged patients was 16 +/- 13 months and was 100% complete; there were 6 late deaths due to non-cardiac causes. All patients presented with clinical improvement (95% are in NYHA functional class I) with low transvalvular gradients and significant regression of left ventricular hypertrophy at two-dimensional echocardiography. CONCLUSIONS: The EPSV used as a miniroot has proved to be a valid option in patients requiring simultaneous replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta. Due to the limited information available on the long-term fate of the porcine aortic valve and root, the use of this device as a miniroot should presently be limited to elderly patients.