Exercise-electrocardiography and/or pharmacological stress echocardiography for non-invasive risk stratification early after uncomplicated myocardial infarction. A prospective international large scale multicentre study.

AIMS: The aim of the present study was to assess the relative prognostic value of clinical variables, the exercise electrocardiography test and the pharmacological stress echocardiography test either with dipyridamole or dobutamine early after a first uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction in a large, multicentre, prospective study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seven hundred and fifty-nine in-hospital patients (age=56+/-10 years) with a recent and first clinical uncomplicated myocardial infarction, with baseline echocardiographic findings of satisfactory quality, an interpretable ECG and able to exercise underwent a resting 2D echocardiogram, a pharmacological stress test with either dipyridamole or dobutamine and an exercise electrocardiography test at a mean of 10 days from the infarction; they were followed-up for a median of 10 months. During the follow-up, there were 13 deaths, 23 non-fatal myocardial infarctions and 59 re-hospitalizations for unstable angina. When all spontaneous events were considered, with multivariate analysis, the difference between the wall motion score index at rest and peak stress (delta wall motion score index), and exercise duration were independent predictors of future spontaneous events (relative risk 7.2; 95% CI=2.73-19.1; P=0.000; relative risk 1.1, 95% CI=1.02-1.18; P=0.008, respectively). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates showed a better outcome for those patients with a negative pharmacological stress echocardiography test compared to patients with low dose positivity (94.7 vs 74.8%, P=0.000). CONCLUSION: Stress echocardiography tests provide stronger information than historical and exercise electrocardiography test variables. Pharmacological echocardiography as well as the exercise ECG is able to predict all spontaneously occurring events when the presence as well as the timing, severity, and extension of stress-induced wall motion abnormalities are considered.

Value of pharmacologic stress echocardiography in risk stratification of patients with single-vessel disease: a report from the Echo-Persantine and Echo-Dobutamine International Cooperative Studies.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to verify the effectiveness of pharmacologic stress echocardiography in risk stratification of patients with single-vessel disease. BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prognostic assessment of single-vessel disease is an unresolved issue to date. METHODS: The study evaluated prospectively collected data from 754 patients with angiographic single-vessel disease who underwent either dipyridamole (n = 576) or dobutamine (n = 178) stress echocardiography. Invasive treatment (coronary revascularization within 3 months of stress testing) was performed in 260 patients and medical treatment in 494. RESULTS: Echocardiographic positivity was observed in 421 patients (56%). Patients treated invasively had a higher incidence of stress test positivity (69% vs. 49%, p < 0.001) and left anterior descending coronary artery involvement (60% vs. 46%, p < 0.001) than patients maintained with medical therapy. During a mean follow-up of 37 months, 54 hard cardiac events occurred (14 deaths, 40 nonfatal infarctions): 37 in medically and 17 in invasively treated patients (7.5% vs. 6.5%, p = NS). On Cox analysis, a positive result on stress testing was the only independent prognostic predictor in medically treated patients (relative risk 2.92, 95% confidence interval 1.29 to 6.59). The 4-year infarction-free survival rate was higher for a negative than a positive stress test result in medically (93.9% vs. 87.3%, p = 0.009) but not invasively treated patients (92.7% vs. 97.1%, p = 0.545). Moreover, a significantly higher 4-year infarction-free survival rate was found in invasively versus medically treated patients with a positive (p = 0.012), but not in those with a negative, stress test result (p = 0.853). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacologic stress echocardiography is effective in risk stratification of single-vessel disease and can accurately discriminate patients in whom coronary revascularization can have the maximal beneficial effect. These findings have a potential favorable impact on the cost-effectiveness of invasive procedures.

Role of stress echocardiography in risk stratification early after an acute myocardial infarction. EPIC (Echo Persantin International Cooperative) and EDIC (Echo Dobutamine International Cooperative) Study Groups.

Resting and stress echocardiography is a 'one-stop shop', which enables a wide range of information to be collected on resting function, myocardial viability, and induced ischaemia, all of which are useful for prognostic stratification. Large scale, multicentre, prospectively collected data show the prognostic failure of resting function and inducible ischaemia, both independently and combined, which are especially effective in predicting cardiac death. The GISSI data show that the increment of risk as a result of reduction in ventricular function has a hyperbolic trend, with a relatively moderate increase in mortality for ejection fraction values between 50 and 30%, but with marked increases below 30%. The EPIC data show that the 1-year risk of cardiac death is as low as 2% in patients with negative dipyridamole stress echocardiography: it doubles if the test is positive at a high dose, and is almost four times higher if it is positive at a low dose. In the field of prognostic stratification, in the absence of carefully controlled studies, the choice between coronary angiography as the only essential study, or use of a non-invasive test to discriminate access to catheterization currently reflect alternate philosophical approaches rather than scientifically based decisions. In the invasive approach, stress echocardiography offers relief from the vicious circle of chest pain-coronary angiography revascularization. In the non-invasive and physiological approach, stress echo is capable of offering, in one sitting, an insight into the main determinants of survival: function, viability, and ischaemia.

The relative value of exercise-electrocardiography and dipyridamole stress echocardiography for risk stratification early after uncomplicated myocardial infarction. The EPIC (Echo Persantine International Cooperative) Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Rational prognostic algorithm should be developed considering the logical progression of the information as it becomes available to the physician, with clinical data first, ECG data second and stress imaging data last. The aim of the present study was to assess in a clinically realistic fashion the relative prognostic value of exercise electrocardiography test (EET) and dipyridamole-echocardiography test (DET) early after first acute uncomplicated myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five hundred and forty-seven in-hospital patients (age = 56 +/- 9 years) with recent clinically uncomplicated first myocardial infarction, baseline echocardiographic findings of satisfactory quality, interpretable ECG and capability to exercise underwent a resting 2D echocardiogram, a DET and an EET at a mean of 10 days from the infarction and were followed up for 16.2 +/- 11 months. During the follow-up, there were 17 cardiac deaths, 19 non-fatal myocardial infarctions and 49 unstable angina. When cardiac death was considered as the only significant event, with multivariate analysis, peak dipyridamole Wall Motion Score Index was the only significant predictor (chi 2 = 5.66; p = 0.013; relative risk estimate = 4.7; confidence intervals = 1.35-16.08). In presence of a negative exercise electrocardiography test for both chest pain and electrocardiographic criteria, the death rate was 2%. CONCLUSION: DET provides stronger information in comparison with historical and EET variables. However, a negative maximal EET is sufficient to identify a very low risk subset in whom additional testing may not be warranted.

Does stress echocardiography predict the site of future myocardial infarction? A large-scale multicenter study. EPIC (Echo Persantine International Cooperative) and EDIC (Echo Dobutamine International Cooperative) study groups.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess whether the site of future myocardial infarction can be predicted on the basis of induced dyssynergy ("area at risk") recognized by stress echocardiography. BACKGROUND: The severity and extent of stress-induced dyssynergy are strong predictors of subsequent major cardiac events. However, high grade stenotic lesions are not strictly associated with the site of future coronary occlusions. METHODS: From the stress echocardiography multicenter trials data bank, we selected 70 patients (56 men; mean age +/- SD 58 +/- 11 years) meeting the following inclusion criteria: 1) dipyridamole (n = 53) or dobutamine (n = 17) stress echocardiography; 2) a spontaneously occurring infarction, with no intercurrent revascularization procedure between the initial study and the infarction; and 3) a follow-up rest echocardiogram obtained 41 +/- 90 days after the infarction. RESULTS: A complete ischemia-infarction mismatch (infarct-related dysfunction in a patient with negative stress test results) occurred in 29 patients (41%). A partial mismatch (ischemic dysfunction in a territory different from the infarct area) occurred in nine patients (13%). A match (ischemia-related and infarction-related dyssynergy involving the same region) occurred in 32 patients (46%). The average time interval between the stress examination and the occurrence of infarction or reinfarction was 144 +/- 160 days in patients with a match and 439 +/- 622 days in patients with a mismatch (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Induced ischemia (imaged as transient dyssynergy by pharmacologic stress echocardiography) inconsistently identifies the site of future infarction. The majority of spontaneous coronary occlusions leading to infarction are unheralded by induced ischemia. However, most infarctions occurring within 1 year of stress testing are in the area identified as ischemic during testing.