Postoperative Distal Coronal Decompensation After Fusion to L3 for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Is Affected by Sagittal Pelvic Parameters.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To identify on early postoperative radiographs the risk factors for late distal decompensation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing posterior fusion surgery to L3. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Sparing distal fusion levels in AIS surgery is considered beneficial for postoperative mobility and outcomes; nonetheless, late distal decompensation is of concern. L3 is often advocated as lower instrumented vertebra in posterior fusion, but progressive angulation of the L3/4 disc is commonly observed. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 78 AIS patients who underwent posterior fusion to L3 from 2007 to 2014. Patients' demographic data, early and 2-year postoperative standing radiographs by biplanar imaging system were investigated. Late decompensation was defined as progressive increase of L3-4 disc wedging angle at 2-year follow-up. Coronal, sagittal, and rotational radiographic parameters were compared between those with and without decompensation. SRS-30 scores were reviewed. RESULTS: Mean age was 14.5-year, and fusion levels averaged 12.0 (range: 6-15); 43 out of 78 patients (55%) experienced progressive L3-4 disc wedging, with 6 showing wedging >5°. L3 translation from the central sacral vertical line (13.9 vs. 11.1 mm, P = 0.13) and increased pelvic tilt (13.3° vs. 8.6°, P = 0.06) on the early postoperative radiograph were associated with increased L3-4 disc wedging. Multivariate analysis revealed that larger pelvic tilt was a significant risk factor for decompensation (odds ratio = 1.1 per 1°, 95% confidence interval: 1.0-1.1, P = 0.04). SRS-30 scores did not differ significantly between the two groups (4.0 vs. 4.1, P = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic retroversion and increased translation of L3 from the central sacral line on the early postoperative radiograph were associated with late L3-4 disc wedging in AIS fusions to L3. Careful surgical planning and correction of sagittal alignment are imperative to ensure the long-term outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Posterior column reconstruction improves fusion rates at the level of osteotomy in three-column posterior-based osteotomies.

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of pseudarthrosis at the osteotomy site after three-column spinal osteotomies (3-COs) with posterior column reconstruction. METHODS: 82 consecutive adult 3-COs (66 patients) with a minimum of 2-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. All cases underwent posterior 3-COs with two-rod constructs. The inferior facets of the proximal level were reduced to the superior facets of the distal level. If that was not possible, a structural piece of bone graft either from the local resection or a local rib was slotted in the posterior column defect to re-establish continual structural posterior bone across the lateral margins of the resection. No interbody cages were used at the level of the osteotomy. RESULTS: There were 34 thoracic osteotomies, 47 lumbar osteotomies and one sacral osteotomy with a mean follow-up of 52 (24-126) months. All cases underwent posterior column reconstructions described above and the addition of interbody support or additional posterior rods was not performed for fusion at the osteotomy level. Among them, 29 patients underwent one or more revision surgeries. There were three definite cases of pseudarthrosis at the osteotomy site (4%). Six revisions were also performed for pseudarthrosis at other levels. CONCLUSION: Restoration of the structural integrity of the posterior column in three-column posterior-based osteotomies was associated with > 95% fusion rate at the level of the osteotomy. Pseudarthrosis at other levels was the second most common reason for revision following adjacent segment disease in the long-term follow-up.

T12 Sagittal Tilt Predicts Thoracic Kyphosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review and analysis of lateral long cassette radiographs. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper is to assess whether certain radiographic features routinely seen on lumbar radiographs can predict a structural thoracic deformity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Obtaining proper sagittal alignment is an essential factor contributing to favorable clinical outcomes following spinal deformity surgery. The majority of patients treated with lumbar fusions do not undergo long cassette radiographs, and therefore physicians must rely upon clinical examination to determine the presence of a structural thoracic kyphotic deformity. METHODS: A total of 193 consecutive lateral long cassette radiographs of outpatients without prior spine surgery presenting to a spine surgeon were independently reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed on sagittal parameters that included the T12 slope, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, T2-T12 and T5-T12 kyphosis, and T12-S1 lordosis, and correlated with patient demographics. RESULTS: The age of the patient combined with the sagittal slope of T12 can be used to assess a patient's risk of having a structural thoracic deformity defined in this series as >35 degrees from T5 to T12 and >40 degrees from T2 to T12. Based on our findings, for a given 20-year-old patient, the threshold T12 sagittal angle was about 17-18 degrees. This angle decreased 2-3 degrees per decade so that the threshold value was 12-13 degrees by age 40, 7-9 degrees by age 60, and 3-4 degrees by age 80. CONCLUSION: Age and the sagittal slope of the 12th thoracic vertebra are effective predictors of kyphosis between T2-T12 and T5-T12. This information may be used to determine the need for long cassette radiographs to further examine the possible presence of kyphotic deformity in the thoracic spine. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

The use of fusion mass screws in revision spinal deformity surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: To report the use of a posterior based 'fusion mass screw' (FMS) as a primary or salvage fixation point in a revision spinal deformity following a previous posterior spinal fusion (PSF). Our experience of this technique in a case report and the clinical and radiological results are reported. OBJECTIVES: To describe the technique and uses of the FMS as a primary/salvage fixation point in osteotomies in previously arthrodesed spinal deformity surgery. Obtaining fixation points to correct and stabilize a spinal deformity with coronal and sagittal imbalance in a previously arthrodesed spine during revision surgery can be challenging. Several alternate pedicle fixation techniques and laminar screw techniques have been described in the literature. However, there is no description of these techniques in the presence of a spinal fusion with distorted anatomy. A pedicle screw placed coronally across a thick posterior fusion mass can provide an alternate method of fixation in these cases with complex anatomy. METHODS: Two cases of complex spinal deformity and corrective spinal osteotomies using fusion mass screws (FMSs) placed coronally across the posterior fusion mass are described. The first case is an 8-year-old patient with Marfan's syndrome who developed a crank shaft phenomenon and severe thoracolumbar kyphoscoliosis following a previous PSF. The second case is a 53-year-old patient with coronal imbalance following PSF as a child using Harrington instrumentation who developed distal degeneration with stenosis in her remaining mobile segments. Both patients underwent vertebral column resection and osteotomy closure plus stabilisation using FMS. The clinical and radiological results and technique for insertion of the FMS are described. CONCLUSION: In this report, we present a novel method of using posterior FMSs to achieve fixation and correction in cases of revision deformity surgery with difficult anatomy. While we feel pedicle screws are the gold standard in deformity correction, knowledge of alternatives such as the FMS can allow surgeons to achieve stable constructs when faced with challenging situations.

Posterior column reconstruction with autologous rib graft after en bloc tumor excision.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of consecutive case series. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of using autologous rib graft for fusion across long posterior column defects. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Achieving fusion across large posterior column defects after en bloc tumor resection can be difficult. Rib graft can be harvested from the local wound, and its shape and structural properties are well suited for reconstruction of thoracic posterior column deficits. METHODS: After Research Ethics Board approval, a retrospective review of the charts of 17 consecutive patients undergoing posterior column reconstruction after en bloc tumor resections was carried out. Autologous vascularized and nonvascularized rib grafts were utilized in 8 and 9 cases, respectively; 14 patients with malignant tumors and 3 with benign etiology. After surgery, patients underwent routine clinical and radiographic follow-up, with a computed tomographic scan performed at a minimum of 6 months in all surviving patients. Clinical and radiographic films were analyzed. RESULTS: Computed tomographic scans at a minimum of 6 months demonstrated graft incorporation in all surviving cases. There was no obvious difference at 6-month imaging to differentiate vascularized from nonvascularized grafts. There were no cases of graft dislodgement or fracture. Graft site morbidity was difficult to isolate from the morbidity of these large procedures. No complications related to the graft were identified. CONCLUSION: The use of autologous rib graft with a proximal step-cut and distal saddle-cut supplemented with posterior instrumentation allowed immediate stabilization of the posterior column defect created by the en bloc tumor resection. This technique of fashioning the graft and taking advantage of its natural curved structure for immediate press-fit was associated with graft incorporation in our cases.