ABSTRACT
Gastrointestinal problems are among the most common health problems which can acutely affect the healthy population and chronically involve health risks, seriously affecting the quality of life. Identifying the risk of gastrointestinal diseases in the early phase by indirect methods can increase the healing rate and the quality of life.: The proposal of this study is to verify a correlation between gastrointestinal and periodontal problems and the risk of inflammatory gastrointestinal diseases (IBD). The study was conducted on 123 people who were observed to have gastrointestinal and psychological problems. The participants were divided into three groups, depending on each one's diagnosis. The control group (CG) was composed of 37 people who did not fit either irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) according to the ROME IV criteria, nor were inflammatory markers positive for IBD. Group 2 (IBS) was composed of 44 participants diagnosed with IBS according to the ROME IV criteria. Group 3 was composed of 42 participants who were diagnosed with IBD. All study participants underwent anthropometric, micro-Ident, and quality of life tests. A directly proportional relationship of the presence of bacteria with IBD patients with the exception of Capnocytophaga spp. and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans was observed. These two bacteria correlated significantly with IBS. Follow-up of the study participants will help determine whether periodontal disease can be used as an indicator of severe colorectal disease. In addition, this study should be continued especially in the case of IBD more thoroughly to follow and reduce the risk of malignancy.
ABSTRACT
AIM: The purpose of this article was to systematically review the literature assessing the efficacy and safety of phase III clinical trials for each direct oral anticoagulant versus vitamin K antagonists and to design a "go-to" table for the prescriber. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review of specialist literature was conducted to identify RCTs which compared direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with standard warfarin treatment. Medline, Em-base, and the Cochrane databases were searched from January 2005- January 2019. The inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials of oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Four publications were phase III randomised control trials (RCTs) included in the final analysis. RESULTS: Regarding the primary outcome in RELY the results were 1.69% per 100-year patients (p/y) for Warfarin compared to 1.11% p/y dabigatran etexilate 150mg BD (twice daily). In ROCKET AF the rates of the primary outcome were 2.2% p/y for warfarin compared to 1.7% p/y for rivaroxaban 20 mg OD (once daily). In ARISTOTLE trial the rates of the primary outcome were 1.60% p/y for warfarin compared to 1.27% p/y for apixaban 5 mg BD. In ENGAGE AF TIMI, the rates of the primary outcome were 1.50% p/y for warfarin compared to 1.18% p/y for edoxaban 60mg BD. CONCLUSION: DOACs showed to be either noninferior or superior to warfarin with regards to the primary outcome with better safety patterns. Our "go-to" table provides a supportive tool for physicians in preventing medical errors when managing patients on oral anticoagulants.
