ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is a need to improve the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) and reduce treatment side effects. Vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP) is a focal therapy for low-risk low-volume localised PCa, which rapidly disrupts targeted tumour vessels. There is interest in expanding the use of VTP to higher-risk disease. Tumour vasculature is characterised by vessel immaturity, increased permeability, aberrant branching and inefficient flow. FRT alters the tumour microenvironment and promotes transient 'vascular normalisation'. We hypothesised that multimodality therapy combining fractionated radiotherapy (FRT) and VTP could improve PCa tumour control compared against monotherapy with FRT or VTP. METHODS: We investigated whether sequential delivery of FRT followed by VTP 7 days later improves flank TRAMP-C1 PCa tumour allograft control compared to monotherapy with FRT or VTP. RESULTS: FRT induced 'vascular normalisation' changes in PCa flank tumour allografts, improving vascular function as demonstrated using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. FRT followed by VTP significantly delayed tumour growth in flank PCa allograft pre-clinical models, compared with monotherapy with FRT or VTP, and improved overall survival. CONCLUSION: Combining FRT and VTP may be a promising multimodal approach in PCa therapy. This provides proof-of-concept for this multimodality treatment to inform early phase clinical trials.
Subject(s)
Neovascularization, Pathologic/therapy , Photochemotherapy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Animals , Cell Line, Tumor , Combined Modality Therapy , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells , Humans , Male , Mice , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood supply , Survival Analysis , Tumor Microenvironment , Xenograft Model Antitumor AssaysABSTRACT
A functional vascular system is indispensable for drug delivery and fundamental for responsiveness of the tumour microenvironment to such medication. At the same time, the progression of a tumour is defined by the interactions of the cancer cells with their surrounding environment, including neovessels, and the vascular network continues to be the major route for the dissemination of tumour cells in cancer, facilitating metastasis. So how can this apparent conflict be reconciled? Vessel normalisation-in which redundant structures are pruned and the abnormal vasculature is stabilised and remodelled-is generally considered to be beneficial in the course of anti-cancer treatments. A causality between normalised vasculature and improved response to medication and treatment is observed. For this reason, it is important to discern the consequence of vessel normalisation on the tumour microenvironment and to modulate the vasculature advantageously. This article will highlight the challenges of controlled neovascular remodelling and outline how vascular normalisation can shape disease management.
Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/blood supply , Neovascularization, Pathologic/drug therapy , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/pharmacology , Disease Progression , Humans , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Tumor Microenvironment/drug effectsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A) is the principal stimulator of angiogenesis in wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD). However, VEGF-A is generated by alternate splicing into two families, the proangiogenic VEGF-A(xxx) family and the antiangiogenic VEGF-A(xxx)b family. It is the proangiogenic family that is responsible for the blood vessel growth seen in AMD. METHODS: To determine the role of antiangiogenic isoforms of VEGF-A as inhibitors of choroidal neovascularization, the authors used a model of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization in the mouse eye and investigated VEGF-A(165)b effects on endothelial cells and VEGFRs in vitro. RESULTS: VEGF-A(165)b inhibited VEGF-A(165)-mediated endothelial cell migration with a dose effect similar to that of ranibizumab and bevacizumab and 200-fold more potent than that of pegaptanib. VEGF-A(165)b bound both VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 with affinity similar to that of VEGF-A(165). After laser injury, mice were injected either intraocularly or subcutaneously with recombinant human VEGF-A(165)b. Intraocular injection of rhVEGF-A(165)b gave a pronounced dose-dependent inhibition of fluorescein leakage, with an IC(50) of 16 pg/eye, neovascularization (IC(50), 0.8 pg/eye), and lesion as assessed by histologic staining (IC(50), 8 pg/eye). Subcutaneous administration of 100 microg twice a week also inhibited fluorescein leakage and neovascularization and reduced lesion size. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that VEGF-A(165)b is a potent antiangiogenic agent in a mouse model of age-related macular degeneration and suggest that increasing the ratio of antiangiogenic-to-proangiogenic isoforms may be therapeutically effective in this condition.
Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/pharmacology , Choroidal Neovascularization/prevention & control , Disease Models, Animal , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/pharmacology , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Animals , Cell Movement/drug effects , Choroidal Neovascularization/diagnosis , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Endothelium, Vascular/drug effects , Endothelium, Vascular/metabolism , Fluorescein Angiography , Humans , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Recombinant Proteins/pharmacokinetics , Recombinant Proteins/pharmacology , Retinal Vessels , Surface Plasmon Resonance , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/pharmacokinetics , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1/metabolism , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2/metabolismABSTRACT
PURPOSE: A number of key ocular diseases, including diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration, are characterized by localized areas of epithelial or endothelial damage, which can ultimately result in the growth of fragile new blood vessels, vitreous hemorrhage, and retinal detachment. VEGF-A(165), the principal neovascular agent in ocular angiogenic conditions, is formed by proximal splice site selection in its terminal exon 8. Alternative splicing of this exon results in an antiangiogenic isoform, VEGF-A(165)b, which is downregulated in diabetic retinopathy. Here the authors investigate the antiangiogenic activity of VEGF(165)b and its effect on retinal epithelial and endothelial cell survival. METHODS: VEGF-A(165)b was injected intraocularly in a mouse model of retinal neovascularization (oxygen-induced retinopathy [OIR]). Cytotoxicity and cell migration assays were used to determine the effect of VEGF-A(165)b. RESULTS: VEGF-A(165)b dose dependently inhibited angiogenesis (IC(50), 12.6 pg/eye) and retinal endothelial migration induced by 1 nM VEGF-A(165) across monolayers in culture (IC(50), 1 nM). However, it also acts as a survival factor for endothelial cells and retinal epithelial cells through VEGFR2 and can stimulate downstream signaling. Furthermore, VEGF-A(165)b injection, while inhibiting neovascular proliferation in the eye, reduced the ischemic insult in OIR (IC(50), 2.6 pg/eye). Unlike bevacizumab, pegaptanib did not interact directly with VEGF-A(165)b. CONCLUSIONS: The survival effects of VEGF-A(165)b signaling can protect the retina from ischemic damage. These results suggest that VEGF-A(165)b may be a useful therapeutic agent in ischemia-induced angiogenesis and a cytoprotective agent for retinal pigment epithelial cells.
