Acupuncture Treatment for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Randomized Pilot Study.

Background: Methods of conservative management for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) are burdensome in terms of time, cost, and convenience. In addition, many patients are not candidates for surgical treatment. Preliminary results have demonstrated possible beneficial effects of acupuncture for patients with BCRL. In this small pilot study, we examined the safety and feasibility of an acupuncture randomized control trial (RCT) in this patient cohort, utilizing a battery of standardized clinical and patient-centered outcome measures. Methods and Results: Patients with BCRL were randomized 2:1 to the acupuncture (n = 10) or the control (n = 4) group. Patients received acupuncture to the unaffected extremity biweekly for 6 weeks. Feasibility was defined as enrollment ≥80%, completion of ≥9 of 12 acupuncture sessions per person, and ≥75% completion of three of three measurement visits. To inform a future adequately powered RCT, we describe within-group changes in patient-centered outcomes, including circumferential measurements, bioimpedance spectroscopy, perometry, cytokine levels, and patient quality of life. Adverse events were systematically tracked. Fourteen patients completed the study. Of those who received acupuncture (n = 10), 8 completed all 12 acupuncture sessions, and 2 patients completed 11 sessions. Ninety-three percent of all participants completed all three measurement visits. There was no consistent improvement in arm volumes. Inflammatory marker levels had inconclusive fluctuations among both groups. All patients receiving acupuncture demonstrated an improvement in their functional quality-of-life score. No severe adverse events occurred. Conclusions: A randomized controlled study of acupuncture for BCRL is feasible. The acupuncture intervention is acceptable in this population, without safety concerns in a small sample and warrants further investigation.

Assessing Burnout and Professional Fulfillment in Breast Surgery: Results From a National Survey of the American Society of Breast Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Physician burnout is a well-recognized problem in health care that has a negative impact on professional well-being and quality of patient care. Rates of burnout in breast surgery are not well-defined. This study sought to understand the degree of burnout among breast surgeons and to identify factors that influence professional fulfillment. METHODS: All U.S. members of the American Society of Breast Surgeons with a valid email address were surveyed in October 2017. The results were anonymous, and the participants were blinded to the study hypothesis. The survey included 30 questions (16-item Professional Fulfillment Index [PFI] and 14-item demographics/practice patterns). Multivariable linear regressions were performed to assess overall burnout and high professional fulfillment. RESULTS: Of the 2568 surveys delivered, 708 surveys were initiated, and 660 were completed. Among breast surgeons, 270 (41.3%) expressed burnout, whereas 281 (42.5%) reported high professional fulfillment. In the multivariable analysis, years in practice was inversely associated with burnout and positively correlated with professional fulfillment. Working more than 60 h per week was positively associated with burnout, and having more than 50% of practice dedicated to breast surgery correlated positively with fulfillment. CONCLUSION: Approximately 4 of 10 breast surgeons have symptoms of burnout, whereas 4 of 10 surgeons report high professional fulfillment. Specific clinical practice conditions largely influence rates of burnout and professional fulfillment. The contributing factors identified in the study analysis may be useful in identifying breast surgeons at higher risk for burnout. The study findings also help to inform the design of interventions focused on the clinical practice environment to promote professional fulfillment and sustainability.