Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 21(19): 4270-4277, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29077171

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To report the incidence and the major risk factors (RFs) associated with preterm birth (PTB), combining both maternal RFs and cervical length (CL), and to understand if cervical length measurement is really useful in all the patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 2048 women admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Messina, over a 2-year period. Preterm cases represented approximately 8.64% of our total population and, exactly, 65% were late preterm, 32% were preterm, and 3% were extremely preterm. RESULTS: An analysis of PTB sub-categories based on gestational age showed a stronger correlation between gestational age and CL among preterm and extremely preterm, while no correlation was found among late preterm. Between preterm cases and controls, there was a significant difference in pre-pregnancy weight and Body Mass Index (BMI). Moreover, a significant association between PTB and uterine anomalies, poli-oligodramnios and hypertension was found. CONCLUSIONS: We strongly suggest adding a transvaginal ultrasound CL universal screening to all pregnant women at the time of the second trimester ultrasound. We encourage further studies to identify new RFs of PTB and to define the mechanisms by which risk factors are related to PTB.


Subject(s)
Cervical Length Measurement , Premature Birth/diagnostic imaging , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Adult , Cervix Uteri , Cohort Studies , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Incidence , Italy , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Ultrasonography
2.
BJOG ; 124(3): 414-421, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27921380

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared induction of labour with expectant management in non-diabetic women with suspected fetal macrosomia. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of labour induction for suspected fetal macrosomia. SEARCH STRATEGY: Literature search in electronic databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all RCTs of suspected fetal macrosomia comparing labour induction with expectant management in term pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was the incidence of caesarean delivery. MAIN RESULTS: Four RCTs, including 1190 non-diabetic women with suspected fetal macrosomia at term, were analysed. Pooled data did not show a significant difference in incidence of caesarean delivery [relative risk (RR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-1.09], operative and spontaneous vaginal delivery, shoulder dystocia, intracranial haemorrhage, brachial plexus palsy, Apgar score <7 at 5 min, cord blood pH <7, and mean birth weight comparing women who received induction of labour with those who were managed expectantly. The induction group had a significantly lower time to delivery (mean difference -7.55 days, 95% CI -8.20 to -6.89), lower rate of birth weight ≥4000 g (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.42-0.59) and ≥4500 g (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.11-0.39), and lower incidence of fetal fractures (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-0.79) compared with expectant management group. CONCLUSION: Induction of labour ≥38 weeks for suspected fetal macrosomia is associated with a significant decrease in fetal fractures, and therefore can be considered as a reasonable option. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: #Induction of labour for #macrosomia improves neonatal outcome.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Fetal Macrosomia/therapy , Labor, Induced/methods , Watchful Waiting/methods , Female , Humans , Incidence , Labor, Induced/adverse effects , Obstetric Labor Complications/epidemiology , Obstetric Labor Complications/etiology , Pregnancy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Term Birth
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...